The Linguistic Construction of Gender: Masculinity and Femininity in Arabic Grammar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1504.19Keywords:
Arabic language, Arabic grammar, gender inequality, gendered language, text and contextAbstract
Studies of gender have generally focused on the relationship between men and women within the context of social reality, rather than the construction of gender through language. This paper thus explores how language, specifically Arabic, contributes to the construction of gender and how the intersection of text and context shapes understandings of gender. The study reveals that Arabic words and sentences connote specific masculine and feminine identities that influence the social construction of gender. Texts provide spaces for the relationships between men and women to be discussed, and language influences their dynamics. This paper concludes that gender relations not only influence social reality, but also textual reality. As such, an understanding of social reality necessitates an understanding of the text. This paper thus emphasizes the importance of analytically linking language with social reality and framing language as a reflection of social reality.
References
Abdulaal, M. A. A. (2020). A shift from a monoglossic to a heteroglossic view: Metalinguistic stego-translanguaging lens approach. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 461–473. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.29
Backer, E., & Gorter, D. (2012). Translanguaging in the digital era: The interaction between language and technology. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 11(3), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2012.699104
Bhatt, R. M. (2014). World Englishes in the digital age. Cambridge University Press.
Canagarajah, S. (2011). Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy. Applied Linguistics Review, 2(1), 1-28.
Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy. In M. S. Martin & C. A. Cruz (Eds.), Language and literacy development in multilingual contexts (pp. 47-61). Springer.
Chen, X. (2020). Translanguaging and code-switching in social media contexts. Language and Communication, 70, 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.12.004
Clyne, M. (2015). The role of multilingualism in the digital age: A sociolinguistic perspective. Routledge.
Coupland, N. (2007). Language and social interaction: Multilingualism and social practice. In D. W. Fisher & L. C. Roth (Eds.), Handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 295-313). Blackwell.
Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press.
Danet, B., & Herring, S. C. (2007). The multilingual Internet: Language, culture, and communication online. Oxford University Press.
Duranti, A. (2014). Translanguaging, language ideologies, and the practice of multilingualism. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 24(2), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12068
García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Wiley-Blackwell.
García, O., & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism, and education. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gee, J. P. (2015). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (4th ed.). Routledge.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.
Herring, S. C., & Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). The language of social media. In R. I. D. Llamas & M. S. Werder (Eds.), The handbook of language and new media (pp. 17-39). Wiley-Blackwell.
Hsieh, E. (2017). Translanguaging in digital spaces: Language choices and practices of young people online. Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1389192
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). Penguin.
Jørgensen, J. N. et al. (2011). Polylanguaging in superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2), 23-37.
Leung, C., & Street, B. V. (2012). Multilingualism and new literacies in the digital age. In K. P. Bhatia & W. C. B. O’Donnell (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of multilingualism (pp. 520-537). Routledge.
Markham, A. N., & Baym, N. K. (2020). Internet inquiry: A field guide. SAGE.
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Social motivations for code-switching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford University Press.
Ochs, E. (2013). Multilingualism and the construction of social identities in the digital world. In O. García & L. Wei (Eds.), Translanguaging and education (pp. 102-119). Multilingual Matters.
Pennycook, A. (2018). Language and mobility: Global flows and local complexity. Routledge.
Phillips, A. (2020). Code-switching and translanguaging in digital communication. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 14(2), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.42945
Piller, I. (2016). Linguistic diversity and social justice: An introduction to applied sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2011). Exploring the role of translanguaging in the digital age. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 557-576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811418224
Warschauer, M. (2002). Language, identity, and the Internet. In The handbook of language and globalization (pp. 428-445). Wiley-Blackwell.
Wei, L. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw045
