Discursive Strategies Uncovered: Understanding Chinese New Year Speeches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1504.18Keywords:
discursive strategies, New Year speeches, Discourse-Historical Approach, Critical Discourse Analysis, ChinaAbstract
This study examines the discursive strategies employed in Chinese New Year speeches delivered by the Chinese President from 2014 to 2024, investigating how these annual addresses function as significant platforms for national communication and revealing underlying power relations and ideological constructions. The research analyzes how nomination and predication strategies are deployed to construct and convey national messages within culturally significant contexts, while simultaneously exploring how these linguistic choices serve to legitimize and naturalize specific power structures and ideological positions. Drawing on the theoretical framework of Critical Discourse Analysis and employing Wodak’s Discourse-Historical approach, the analysis specifically examines two major discursive strategies: nomination strategies (encompassing personal reference, spatial reference, and metaphors) and predication strategies (focusing on explicit predicates and comparisons). This methodological framework enables a detailed investigation into how linguistic devices are strategically employed to construct national narratives and reproduce power relations through seemingly neutral cultural discourse. The findings reveal sophisticated patterns in discursive strategies: nomination strategies frequently employ spatial references to reinforce power hierarchies and metaphors that naturalize specific ideological positions, while personal references strategically shift between individual and collective voices to establish authority. The predication strategies demonstrate the systematic use of explicit predicates to legitimize national decisions and strategic comparisons that frame current developments within carefully constructed historical narratives. These results illuminate how Chinese New Year speeches effectively combine traditional cultural elements with contemporary national objectives, revealing the subtle ways in which power and ideology are embedded within ceremonial communication.
References
Bao, C., & Cheng, B. (2018). Interpersonal Function in English Version of President Xi Jinping’s New Year’s greetings on 2018. Francis Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.25236/iwass.2018.159
Cao, Y., & Gao, W. (2020). A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s New Year Message. US-China Foreign Language, 18, 210-217. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8080/2020.07.002
Charteris-Black, J. (2018). Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Ciumacenco, V. (2018). A Pragmatic Approach towards the Presidential Address for the New Year. In New Approaches in Social and Humanistic Sciences-NASHS 2017 (pp. 137-152). Editura Lumen, Asociatia Lumen.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
Jessop, B., Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (2008). Education and the knowledge-based economy in Europe (Vol. 24). Brill.
Jia, T. (2023). A Study on Chinese-English Translation of the 2023 New Year Address of Chinese President Xi Jinping from the Perspective of Catford’s Translation Shifts Theory. Journal of Higher Education Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.32629/jher.v4i1.1120
Kakisina, P. A., Indhiarti, T. R., & Al Fajri, M. S. (2022). Discursive strategies of manipulation in COVID-19 political discourse: The case of Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro. SAGE Open, 12(1), 21582440221079884.
Li, Y., & Wu, D. (2018). A Discourse Analysis of Deliberate Metaphors in President Xi’s New Year Speeches from 2015-2017 3rd International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2018).
Lin, H. (2023). An Exploratory Study of the Interpersonal Meanings of President Xi’s New Year Speech Based on Appraisal Theory. Cultural and religious studies, 11(2), 84-90.
Meng, Y. (2021). Analysis on President Xi’s New Year Greeting from Perspective of Transitivity. Learning & Education, 10(2), 1-3.
Nawaz, M. H., Ikhtiar, A., Raza, A. M., & Nouman, M. (2024). Critical Discourse Analysis of Political Speeches in Pakistan: Power, Ideology and Language Manipulation. Futurity Proceedings, 1.
Sanakoyeva, N., & Zakarliuka, M. (2020). Constructing the Image of Sociocultural Reality by Means of Political Speeches (by the Example of the New Year Speeches of the President of Ukraine 2014–2017). State and Regions. Series: Social Communications(3 (35)), 109-112.
Thompson, J. B. (2013). Ideology and modern culture: Critical social theory in the era of mass communication. John Wiley & Sons.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Political discourse and ideology. Doxa Comunicación. Revista interdisciplinar de estudios de comunicación y ciencias sociales, 207-225.
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63-94). https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.d6
Wodak, R. (2009). The semiotics of racism: A critical discourse-historical analysis. Discourse, of course: An overview of research in discourse studies, 311-326.
Wodak, R. (2011). Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. Discursive pragmatics, 8, 50-70.
Wodak, R. (2014). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge companion to English studies (pp. 302-316). Routledge.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2, 1-33.
Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Sage.
Wu, Y., Thomas, R., & Yu, Y. (2021). From external propaganda to mediated public diplomacy: The construction of the Chinese dream in president Xi Jinping’s new year speeches. Public diplomacy and the politics of uncertainty, 29-55.
Yicheng, C., & Wencheng, G. (2020). A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s New Year Message. US-China Foreign Language, 18.
