Dissecting the Rise of Ideological Constructs in Educators’ Pedagogical Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1502.26Keywords:
ideological constructs, teachers’ discourse, critical discourse analysisAbstract
Contemporary classrooms have undergone significant transformations, evolving from a primary emphasis on acquiring knowledge to a crucial role in shaping individual ideologies among learners. Thus, the current inquiry intends to shed light on the means by which the instructional discourse enacted by teachers in the classroom raises the ideologies of learners. In order to acquire a set of representative data, an in-depth examination of the pedagogical discourse articulated by distinct educators was undertaken. It is posited that the application of Fairclough’s (1992) CDA framework encompassing text analysis, discursive practice, and social practice is considered pertinent for critically unveiling the underlying ideological constructs that emerged within the discourses. The research findings meticulously delineate ideologies that incorporate the principles of academic integrity and diligence, self-reflection and emotional awareness, critical thinking and independence, inclusivity and engagement, resilience, and continuous improvement. These elements are prominently highlighted and strongly promoted in academic contexts, especially in educational settings. To proficiently bolster the previously mentioned ideologies, language fulfills a crucial role in the complex mechanisms of ideological dissemination by utilizing a blend of imperatives, conditional frameworks, reflective and open-ended questions, and colloquial expressions, alongside a supportive tone and humor. The proactive endorsement and nurturing of diverse ideological frameworks significantly contribute to the comprehensive development of students, enhancing their progression not solely in academic pursuits but also in personal and social spheres. Hence, it is imperative to integrate various ideological frameworks into the classroom to embody the students' holistic development.
References
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). Academic Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Bärmann, J., Behnke, M., & Thein, C. (2022). Controversy in the philosophy-classroom - a collective book review. Journal of Didactics of Philosophy, 6, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.46586/JDPh.2022.9867
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263.
Brookfield, S. (2015). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom. Jossey-Bass.
Brown, C., & MacDonald, L. (2018). Ethics in higher education: Promoting integrity. Routledge.
Chen, H. (2023). Study on process methodology in ideological and political education. International Journal of Education and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13525
Cortés, E. R. (2023). Bringing ideology into the legal translation classroom: A step towards training translators for counterhegemonic legal translation? Onomázein: Journal of Linguistics, Philology and Translation, Special Issue XII, 26-56. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.ne12.02
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry& research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.) Sage.
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Flick, U. (2013). The sage handbook of qualitative data analysis: Mapping the field. Sage.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Bloomsbury.
Ginting, P., Murni, S. M., & Pulungan, A. H. (2024). A multimodal discourse analysis of ideological identity endorsed on the university's homepages. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(7), 2211-2221. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1407.29
Gu, F. (2023). How to integrate curriculum ideology and politics into the language teaching system. Frontiers in Educational Research, 6(1), 47-50. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2023.060108
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Kesevan, H. V. (2016). Assessing ideologies and discursive practices of monolingual and multilingual English teachers in EFL classroom context. Proceedings of the First Reciprocal Graduate Research Symposium between University Pendidikan Sultan Idris and Syiah Kuala University. CAPEU: Consortium of Asia-Pacific Education Universities, 43-56.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: moral stages and the idea of justice. Harper & Row.
Lück, J. & Rudman, S. (2017). Identity, ideology and discourse: Classroom spaces for deconstructions and reconstructions. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 5-19.
Mao, X. (2022). Teaching reform practice of digital media technology course in the context of curriculum ideology and politics. Advances in Economics and Management Research, 1(2), 6-10. https://doi.org/10.56028/aemr.2.1.6
Mazer, J. P. (2018) Teachers, students, and ideological bias in the college classroom. Communication Education, 67(2), 254-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1428761
McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
Myers, P. L. (2002). Beware of the man of one book. Journal of Teaching in the Addictions, 1(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1300/j188v01n01_06
Palmer, C., & Bolderston, A. (2006). A brief introduction to qualitative research. The Canadian Journal of Medical Radiation Technology, 16-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0820-5930(09)60112-2
Pang, M., Yang, X., Jia, Q., & Zhang, M. (2023). Research on the construction of "one core, three common learning" college teaching community from the perspective of curriculum ideology and politics. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 2(2), 85-89.
Patton, M. Q., & Cochran, M. (2002). A guide to using qualitative research methodology. Medecins Sans Frontieres.
Sumarna, C. & Gunawan, H. (2022). Foundations of constructivism philosophy in classroom learning. International Journal of Science and Society, 4(3), 53-65.
van Dijk, T. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4, 249-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
van Dijk, T. (1995). Aims of discourse analysis. Japanese Discourse, 1, 17-27.
Vindevoghel, L. J. (2016). Power, identity, and the construction of knowledge in education. Autumn, 2(22), 87-97.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Waly, S. (2022). The classroom as a space for power and healing: Examining the case of New York City after Trump’s election. In K. Monkman, A. Frkovich, & A. Proweller (Eds.), Navigating precarity in educational contexts (pp. 103-119). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003258223-9Xiuli, 2023.
Yin, L. & Gu, Y. (2023). Research on the ideological and political construction path of university English courses based on blended teaching in the post-epidemic period. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology, 6(11), 68-72. https://doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2023.061113
Zins, J. E., & Elias, M. J. (2007). Social and emotional learning: Promoting the development of all students. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17, 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410701413152
