Morphosemantic Role of the Regular Plural Morpheme Within English Compounds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1502.17Keywords:
regular plural morpheme, English compounds, morphosemantic role, linking elements, lexical pluralsAbstract
This study investigates the semantic role of the regular plural morpheme in the modifiers of English compounds (e.g., publications catalogue, weapons inspection), specifically examining whether this morpheme functions solely as a grammatical connector or also contributes semantic meaning. Sixty-seven monolingual native English speakers rated the acceptability of 80 sentences containing novel compounds with a medial regular plural morpheme. The compounds were divided into two types: those referring to many tokens of the same entity, such as *cars collection, and those referring to multiple types within a category, such as vehicles exhibition. The results revealed a statistically significant preference for compounds referring to multiple types, with participants rating these compounds as more acceptable than those indicating many tokens of the same entity. Such results provide evidence that the regular plural morpheme inside compounds contributes to semantic distinctions when it denotes categorical diversity. The findings have important implications for linguistic theory, demonstrating that the regular plural morpheme within compounds is not simply a grammatical linking element observed in noun compounds of other Germanic languages, but rather one that carries morphosemantic weight. In conclusion, the study argues that the regular plural within compounds operates similarly to lexical plurals, contributing semantic distinctions beyond its function as an inflectional marker.
References
Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Why compounds researchers aren’t rats eaters: Semantic constraints on regular plurals inside compounds. Columbia University.
Alexiadou, A. (2021). Lexical plurals. In P. C. Hofherr & J. Doetjes (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammatical number (pp. 242-256). Oxford University Press.
Al-Shehri, A. A. (2014). Regular plural inside English compounds within the theory of base-driven stratification [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Edinburgh.
Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior research methods, 52, 388-407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
Aronoff, M., & Fuhrhop, N. (2002). Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: Closing suffixes and the monosuffix constraint. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 20(3), 451-490. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015858920912
Bell, M. (2012). The English noun-noun construct: A morphological and syntactic object. Mediterranean Morphology Meetings, 8, 59–90.
Berent, I., & Pinker, S. (2007). The dislike of regular plurals in compounds: Phonological familiarity or morphological constraint? The Mental Lexicon, 2(2), 129-181. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.2.2.03ber
Bergsten, N. (1911). A study of compound substantives in English. Almqvist & Wiksell.
Clahsen, H. (1995). German plurals in adult second language development. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker, & S. Gass (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage: Studies in honour of William E. Rutherford (pp. 123-137). John Benjamins.
Cunnings, I., & Clahsen, H. (2007). The time-course of morphological constraints: Evidence from eye-movements during reading. Cognition, 104(3), 476-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.010
Davies, M. (2024a). The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA). Retrieved March 4, 2024, from https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
Davies, M. (2024b). The NOW corpus (News on the Web Corpus). Retrieved March 4, 2024, from https://www.english-corpora.org/now/
Dressler, W., Libben, G., Stark, J., Pons, C., & Jarema, G. (2001). The processing of interfixed German compounds. In G. Booij & J. van Marie (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology (pp. 185-220). Kluwer.
Fenger, P., & Harðarson, G. R. (2021). The plurals are not what they seem: On linking morphemes and inflection in West Germanic. Retrieved May 10, 2024, from https://gislihardarson.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/l_articl_-4.pdf
Haskell, T., MacDonald, M., & Seidenberg, M. (2003). Language learning and innateness: Some implications of compounds research. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 119-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00007-0
Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical phonology and morphology. In I. Yang (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp. 3-91). Hanshin.
Koester, D., Gunter, T., Wagner, S., & Friederici, A. (2004). Morphosyntax, prosody, and linking elements: The auditory processing of German nominal compounds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(9), 1647-1668. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929042568541
Lieber, R., & Štekauer, P. (Eds.). (2009). The Oxford handbook of compounding. Oxford University Press.
Montgomery, B. (2001). Studies in German and English morphology with special reference to 'linking elements' [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Edinburgh.
Neef, M. (2009). IE, Germanic: German. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 386–399). Oxford University Press.
Nübling, D., & Szczepaniak, R. (2008). On the way from morphology to phonology: German linking elements and the role of the phonological word. Morphology, 18, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-008-9120-7
Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: a third decade of research (2nd edn). Jossey-Bass.
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Pop, I. B. (2022). On some idiosyncrasies exhibited by the plural of compounds. Meridian Critic, 41, 265-276.
Schlücker, B. (2023). Compounding and linking elements in Germanic. Retrieved February 9, 2024, from https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-954
Senghas, A., Kim, J., Pinker, S., & Collins, C. (1991). Plurals-inside compounds: Morphological constraints and their implications for acquisition. In sixteenth annual Boston university conference on language development October (pp.18-20).
Sproat, R. (1985). On deriving the lexicon. MIT.
Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Diependaele, K. (2009). Does bilingualism change native-language reading? Cognate effects in a sentence context. Psychological Science, 20(8), 923-927. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02389.x
Wegener, H. (2008). The grammaticalization of linking elements in German. In S. Seoane & M. López-Couso (Eds.), Theoretical and empirical issues in grammaticalization (pp. 333–354). Benjamins.
Weinberg, S. L., Abramowitz, S. K. (2008). Statistics using SPSS: An integrative approach. Cambridge University Press.
