Investigating the Influence of Phonotactic Probability on Spoken Word Recognition in Arabic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1501.27Keywords:
first language processing, phonotactic probability, speechAbstract
Evidence from English suggests that high phonotactic probability exerts facilitative effects on spoken word recognition. However, when lexical representations are activated in a Lexical Decision task, a reversed pattern of results is observed. That is, high phonotactic probability nonwords produce longer reaction times. In the present research, the influence of phonotactic probability on spoken word recognition in Arabic was examined using an auditory Lexical Decision task. In contrast to clear phonotactic probability effects in English, no effects of phonotactic probability on spoken word recognition in Arabic have been observed. We posit that some characteristics in Arabic morphology can impose processing demands that can diminish effects of phonotactic probability.
References
REFERENCES
Aljasser, F. (2020). Root and Pattern Effects in the Processing of Spoken Non-Words in Arabic. International Journal of Linguistics, 12(2), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v12i2.16545
Aljasser, F., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2018). A Web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in Modern Standard Arabic. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0872-z
Arts, T., Belinkov, Y., Habash, N., Kilgarriff, A., & Suchomel, V. (2014). ArTenTen: Arabic corpus and word sketches. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 26(4), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2014.06.009
Arutiunian, V., & Lopukhina, A. (2020). The effects of phonological neighborhood density in childhood word production and recognition in Russian are opposite to English. Journal of Child Language, 47(6), 1244–1262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000920000112
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2011). Productivity and priming: Morphemic decomposition in Arabic. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4–6), 624–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.521022
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2013). Morphological structure in the Arabic mental lexicon: Parallels between standard and dialectal Arabic. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(10), 1453–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.719629
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2015). Structure, form, and meaning in the mental lexicon: evidence from Arabic. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(8), 955–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1048258
Bracco, G., Calderone, B., & Celata, C. (2015). Phonotactic probabilities in Italian simplex and complex words: A fragment priming study. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1347, 24–28.
Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(1), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.14.1.113
Dal Ben, R., de Hollanda Souza, D., & Hay, J. F. (2021). When statistics collide: The use of transitional and phonotactic probability cues to word boundaries. Memory & Cognition, 49(7), 1300–1310. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01191-0
Dal Ben, R., Souza, D. de H., & Hay, J. F. (2022). Combining statistics: the role of phonotactics on cross-situational word learning. Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, 35(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-022-00234-y
Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Auditory Lexical Decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(6), 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909696386944
Graf Estes, K., Edwards, J., & Saffran, J. R. (2011). Phonotactic Constraints on Infant Word Learning. Infancy, 16(2), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2010.00046.x
Han, M. K., Storkel, H. L., Lee, J., & Cox, C. (2016). The effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on adults’ word learning in noisy conditions. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-14-0165
Holes, C. (2004). Modern Arabic: Structures, functions, and varieties. Georgetown University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0094
Hoover, J. R., Storkel, H. L., & Hogan, T. P. (2010). A cross-sectional comparison of the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.003
Jusczyk, P. W., Friederici, A., Wessels, J., Svenkerud, V., & Jusczyk, A. (1993). Infants’ sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 402–420.
Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1994). Infants′ Sensitivity to Phonotactic Patterns in the Native Language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(5), 630–645. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1030
Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001
Luef, E. M., & Resnik, P. (2023). Phonotactic Probabilities and Sub-syllabic Segmentation in Language Learning. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 9(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.31261/TAPSLA.12468
Macroy-Higgins, M., Shafer, V. L., Schwartz, R. G., & Marton, K. (2014). The influence of phonotactic probability on word recognition in toddlers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30(1), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659013487534
Mattys, S., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2001). Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants. Cognition, 78(2), 91–121.
McKean, C., Letts, C., & Howard, D. (2014). Triggering word learning in children with Language Impairment: The effect of phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density. Journal of Child Language, 41(6), 1224–1248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000913000445
Nieder, J., & Tomaschek, F. (2023). Maltese as a merger of two worlds: A cross-language approach to phonotactic classification. PLoS ONE, 18(4 April), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284534
Otake, T., Hatano, G., Cutler, A., & Mehler, J. (1993). Mora or Syllable? Speech Segmentation in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(2), 258–278. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1014
Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (2006). Word length and lexical activation: Longer is better. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1120–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1120
Quémart, P., & Maillart, C. (2016). The sensitivity of children with SLI to phonotactic probabilities during lexical access. Journal of Communication Disorders, 61, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.03.005
Roach, P. (2009). English Phonetics and Phonology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schenider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
Steffman, J., & Sundara, M. (2024). Disentangling the Role of Biphone Probability From Neighborhood Density in the Perception of Nonwords. Language and Speech, 67(1), 166–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309231164982
Storkel, H. L., Armbrüster, J., & Hogan, T. P. (2006). Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(6), 1175–1192. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/085)
Storkel, H. L., & Hoover, J. R. (2010). An online calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on the basis of child corpora of spoken American English. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.497
Storkel, H., & Rogers, M. (2000). The effect of probabilistic phonotactics on lexical acquisition. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 14(6), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/026992000415859
Strauß, A., Wu, T., McQueen, J. M., Scharenborg, O., & Hintz, F. (2022). The differential roles of lexical and sublexical processing during spoken-word recognition in clear and in noise. Cortex, 151, 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.02.011
Sundara, M., Zhou, Z. L., Breiss, C., Katsuda, H., & Steffman, J. (2022). Infants’ developing sensitivity to native language phonotactics: A meta-analysis. Cognition, 221, 104993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104993
Thorn, A. S. C., & Frankish, C. R. (2005). Long-term knowledge effects on serial recall of nonwords are not exclusively lexical. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 31(4), 729–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.729
van der Kleij, S. W., Rispens, J. E., & Scheper, A. R. (2016). The effect of phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density on pseudoword learning in 6- and 7-year-old children. First Language, 36(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723715626064
Vitevitch, M. S. (2002a). Influence of onset density on spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(2), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.2.270
Vitevitch, M. S. (2002b). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.735
Vitevitch, M. S., & Aljasser, F. M. (2021). Phonotactics in SpokenWord Recognition. In J. Pardo, L. Nygaard, R. Remez, & D. Pisoni (Eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception, Second Edition. (Second, pp. 286–308). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Vitevitch, M. S., & Donoso, A. J. (2012). Phonotactic probability of brand names: I’d buy that! Psychological Research, 76(6), 693–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0374-z
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998b). When Words Compete: Levels of Processing in Perception of Spoken Words. Psychological Science, 9(4), 325–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00064
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(3), 374–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2618
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (2005). Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.003
Vitevitch, M. S., & Rodríguez, E. (2005). Neighborhood density effects in spoken word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 3(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14769670400027332
Vitevitch, M. S., Stamer, M. K., & Sereno, J. A. (2008). Word length and lexical competition: longer is the same as shorter. Language and Speech, 51(4), 361–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830908099070
Vitevitch, M., & Stamer, M. (2006). The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(6), 760–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960500287196
Wright, W. (1995). A grammar of the Arabic language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zamuner, T. S. (2009). Phonotactic probabilities at the onset of language development: speech production and word position. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0138)
