Emojis as Tools for Learning: Understanding Their Pragmatic Functions in EFL Students’ Tweets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1412.27Keywords:
student, writing, emojis, pragmatics, tweetsAbstract
The rise of emojis has piqued the interest of many scholars over the past few decades, as is evident by a growing body of emoji literature within various fields. This study adopted a qualitative ethnographic approach to explore the pragmatic functions of emojis in the tweets of 15 female undergraduate and graduate EFL students. The focus was on the roles emojis occupied relative to speech acts, identity representation, and language change. Semi-structured interviews and non-participant observations were used as data collection methods while reflexive thematic analysis followed for the analysis. There were six pragmatic functions of emojis, namely expressing emotions, making meaning, mirroring personal beliefs, signaling familiarity, decorating the tweet, and substituting nonverbal cues. Additionally, emojis mitigated speech acts: They were chiefly used to emphasize expressives, but also to soften directives and accompany representatives and commissives. Such emojis represented the participants’ identity, yet the participants’ personalities and societal roles were rarely represented by these emojis due to personal preferences. The evolution of emojis from emoticons to graphicons, however, was identifiable.
References
Al Rashdi, F. (2015). Forms and functions of emojis in WhatsApp interaction among Omanis (Publication No. 3716667) [Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Algharabali, N., & Taqi, H. (2018). Taming the sting: The use of evaluative emojis by college students in Kuwait. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication, 6(1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijlc.v6n1a4
Alshalawi, A. (2022). Social media usage intensity and academic performance among undergraduate students in Saudi Arabia. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11711
Altoaimy, L. (2018). Driving change on Twitter: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the Twitter debates on the Saudi ban on women driving. Social Sciences, 7(5), Article 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7050081
Al-Zou’bi, R., & Shamma, F. (2021). Assessing instructors’ usage of emojis in distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(1), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i1.5520
Beißwenger, M., & Pappert, S. (2019). How to be polite with emojis: A pragmatic analysis of face work strategies in an online learning environment. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 225-253. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2019-0003
Bai, Q., Dan, Q., Mu, Z., & Yang, M. (2019). A systematic review of emoji: Current research and future perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02221
Bloomberg, L., & Volpe, M. (2018). Completing your qualitative dissertation: A road map from beginning to end (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE publications.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Cohn, N., Roijackers, T., Schaap, R., & Engelen, J. (2018). Are emoji a poor substitute for words? Sentence processing with emoji substitutions. In C. Kalish, M. A. Rau, X. J. Zhu, & T. T. Rogers (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1524-1529). Cognitive Science Society.
Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the internet. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164771
Danesi, M. (2017). The semiotics of emojis. Bloomsbury.
Dirksen, V., Huizing, A., & Smit, B. (2010). ‘Piling on layers of understanding’: The use of connective ethnography for the study of (online) work practices. New Media & Society, 12(7), 1045-1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341437
Dresner, E., & Herring, S. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x
Drouin, M., & Davis, C. (2009). R u txting? Is the use of text speak hurting your literacy? Journal of Literacy Research, 41(1), 46-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960802695131
Escouflaire, L. (2020). Building a typology of the linguistic functions of emoji: A cross-linguistic and cross-platform corpus analysis of emoji in conversation [Master thesis, Universitetsbiblioteket i Oslo]. DUO Research Archive.
Evans, V. (2017). The emoji code: The linguistics behind smiley faces and scaredy cats. Picador.
Fahlman, S. (n.d.). Smiley Lore :-). Scott E. Fahlman. Retrieved Jan 11, 2023, from https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~sef/sefSmiley.htm
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Penguin Books.
Gumperz, J. (1976). Language, communication, and public negotiation. In P. R. Sanday (Ed.), Anthropology and the public interest. Fieldwork and theory (pp. 273-292). Academic Press.
Herring, S., Stein, D., & Virtanen, T. (2013). Introduction to the pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. In S. Herring, & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication (pp. 3-32). De Gruyter.
Herring, S., & Dainas, A. (2017). “Nice picture comment!” Graphicons in Facebook comment threads. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, USA, 2185-2194. Retrieved Feb 28, 2023, from http://hdl.handle.net/10125/41419
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350-377). The Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology; John Wiley & Sons.
Kazmi, A., Rana, A., Anjum, U., & Khan, M. (2019). “A picture is worth a thousand words, and so is an emojis?” Emojisfication of language: A pragmatic analysis of Facebook discourse. PLLS 2019 Proceedings, USA.
Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Lakoff, G. (2008). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. Basic Books.
Lee, J., & Pedersen, P. (2018). The online self-presentation of athletes: An analysis of Twitter profile photographs in the sport industry. CHOREGIA, 14(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.4127/ch.2018.0132
Li, J., Longinos, G., Wilson, S., & Magdy, W. (2020). Emoji and self-identity in Twitter bios. In D. Bamman, D. Hovy, D. Jurgens, B. O’Connor, & S. Volkova (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (pp. 199-211). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Li, W., Chen, Y., Hu, T., & Luo, J. (2018). Mining the relationship between emoji usage patterns and personality. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, USA, 12(1), 648-651 https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05143
Lu, X., Ai, W., Liu, X., Li, Q., Wang, N., Huang, G., & Mei, Q. (2016). Learning from the ubiquitous language. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, Germany, 770-780. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971724
Maximova, О., & Lukyanova, G. (2020). Gender differences online: Self-representation and involvement in political communication on Facebook. Heliyon, 6(12), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05613
McCulloch, G. (2019). Because internet: Understanding the new rules of language. Riverhead Books.
McCulloch, G., & Gawne, L. (2018). Emoji grammar as beat gestures. In S. Wijeratne, E. Kiciman, H. Saggion, & A. Sheth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Emoji Understanding and Applications in Social Media (pp. 3-6).
Mohamad, A., Rashid, R., Yunus, K., Rahman, S., Darus, S., Musa, R., & Teh, K. (2018). Speech acts in the Facebook status updates posted by an apostate. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(4), 226. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n4p226
Prada, M., Rodrigues, D., Garrido, M., Lopes, D., Cavalheiro, B., & Gaspar, R. (2018). Motives, frequency and attitudes toward emoji and emoticon use. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), 1925-1934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.06.005
Sadia, J. (2018). A socio-semiotic multimodal analysis of emojis as used in text messaging [Master’s thesis, University of Nairobi]. University of Nairobi Research Archive.
Searle, J. (1975). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In K. Gunderson (Ed.), Language, mind, and knowledge. University of Minnesota Press.
Skovholt, K., Grønning, A., & Kankaanranta, A. (2014). The communicative functions of emoticons in workplace e-mails: :-). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 780-797. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12063
Stanton, A. (2018). Islamic emoticons and religious authority: Emerging practices, shifting paradigms. Contemporary Islam, 12(2), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-017-0412-8
Xie, C., Yus, F., & Haberland, H. (2021). Approaching internet pragmatics. In C. Xie, F. Yus, & H. Haberland (Eds.), Approaches to internet pragmatics: Theory and practice (pp. 1-23). John Benjamins.
