Arabic Profession-Denoting Nouns and Gender: A Morphosyntactic Analysis of Agreement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1412.07Keywords:
Agree, Arabic, φ-features, gender, MinimalismAbstract
The goal of this paper is to present a minimalist feature-based analysis that captures the verbal agreement triggered by female referent profession-denoting nouns in Modern Standard Arabic. In this language, nouns are classified as masculine or feminine based on the natural gender of their referents. Masculine nouns trigger masculine agreement on verbs, whereas feminine nouns trigger feminine agreement. However, some profession-denoting nouns are sometimes gender-neutralized; a masculine noun could be used when the natural gender of its referent is female. In this case, the masculine noun triggers feminine agreement on the verb. This unexpected type of agreement requires analysis under the latest assumptions of the Minimalist Program. The paper shows that the gender-neutralized nouns are initially selected from the numeration and introduced into the derivation with their gender feature specified as feminine. After their features are valued in narrow syntax, these nouns undergo a post-syntactic morphological operation that targets and deletes the feminine morphemes, leaving behind the masculine roots.
References
Alenazy, Mamdouh. A. (in press). Agree-Based Analysis of Arabic Adjectival Agreement and Case. International Journal of Arabic- English Studies.
Alenazy, Mamdouh. A. and Saidat, Ahamad. M. (2015a). Verbal agreement in Arabic: A phase-based approach. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 12(4), 1-16.
Alenazy, Mamdouh. A. and Saidat, Ahamad. M. (2015b). The Implications of Animal Metaphors for Syntactic Agreement in Arabic. Acta Linguistica, 9(1), 98-110.
Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E., & Dominique Sportiche. (1994). Agreement, word order, and conjunction in some varieties of Arabic. Linguistic Inquiry, 25(2), 195-220.
Arregi, Karlos and Nevins, Andrew. (2007). Obliteration vs. impoverishment in the Basque g-/z- constraint. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 13(1), 1-14.
Bonet, Eulàlia. (1991). Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Chomsky, Noam. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz, Ken Hale. A life in language (pp. 1-52). Cambridge, Mass: MIT.
Chomsky, Noam. (2008). On Phases. In C. P. Robert Freidin, Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp. 133-166.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In D. M. Roger Martin, Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–156). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Corbett, Greville G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, Greville G. and Fedden, Sebastian. (2016). Canonical gender. Journal of Linguistics, 52(3), 495-531. doi: doi:10.1017/S0022226715000195
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. (1999). Arabic modifying adjectives and DP structures. Studia Linguistica, 53(2), 105–154.
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. (1993). Issues in the Structure of Arabic Clauses and Words. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Flotow, Luise von. (1997). Translation and Gender: Translating in the “Era of Feminism. University of Ottawa Press.
Hopp, Holger. (2016). Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 32(2), 277–307.
Kramer, Ruth. (2016). The location of gender features in the syntax. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(11), 661–677. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12226
Kramer, Ruth. (2015). The morphosyntax of gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kremers, Joost. (2003). The Arabic noun phrase, a minimalist approach. PhD Dissertation. University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Lakoff, Johnson. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, Robin. (1975). Language and woman's place: text and commentaries. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mahfoudhi, Abdessatar. (2002). Agreement lost, Agreement regained: A minimalist account of word order and agreement variation in Arabic. California Linguistic Notes, 27, 1-28.
Matushansky, Ora. (2013). Gender Confusion. In a. N. Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Diagnosing Syntax (pp. 271-294). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pesetsky, David. (2013). Russian case morphology and the syntactic categories. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Picallo, M. Carme. (1991). Nominals and nominalization in Catalan. Probus, 3, 279-316.
Ritter, Elizabeth. (1993). Where’s gender?. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 795-803.
Ryding, Karin. C. (2005). A reference grammar of modern standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sauerland, Uli. (2004). A comprehensive semantics for agreement. Manuscript, Universität Tübingen.
Soltan, Usama. (2006). Standard Arabic subject-verb agreement asymmetry revisited in an Agree-based minimalist syntax. In C. Boeckx, Agreement Systems (pp. 239-265). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Steriopolo, Olga. (2018). Morphosyntax of gender in Russian sex-differentiable nouns. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 26(1), 307-336.
Steriopolo, Olga. (2019). Mixed gender agreement in the case of Russian hybrid nouns. Questions and Answers in Linguistics, 5(2), 91–105.
Steriopolo, Olga, and Martina Wiltschko. (2010). Distributed gender hypothesis. In P. D. Gerhild Zybatow, Studies in Slavic linguistics: Proceedings of the formal description of Slavic languages 7.5 (pp. 155–172). Bern: Peter Lang.
