Problems in Perception Content-based Learning Materials for Chinese EFL Learners

Authors

  • Fengxian Zhang  Jiangxi Agricultural University
  • Chao Wu Jiangxi Agricultural University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1105.07

Keywords:

problems, EFL learners, content-based learning materials

Abstract

This article explores the problems that EFL learners may encounter when they perceive content-based learning materials. The main questions include: (A) Will inferior reading skills or improper use of learning strategies affect these problems? (B) What are the characteristics of the specific linguistic of reading comprehension that initiate academic problems? (C) How does the learner's learning strategy cause or initiate problems? The data used in this research are learners' midterm exam scores and the frequency of learning strategies employed by students. Including qualitative data in the form of student statements obtained from unstructured participatory interviews, in a descriptive and qualitative way based on content-based reading skills theory and learning strategies, this article will conduct a comprehensive analysis of these materials. As a result of data analysis, there is a situation in which the problems encountered by English readers in understanding content-based learning materials are initiated by inferior reading ability and improper application of learning strategies. The linguistic features of reading comprehension that initiate this problem are the lack of understanding of grammatical features, the low level of vocabulary acquisition, the lack of awareness of sensory construction, and the problems of discourse comprehension. The problems encountered when dealing with learning strategies are improper use of learning strategies, unclear learning goals and poor learning habits.

Author Biographies

Fengxian Zhang,  Jiangxi Agricultural University

Nanchang Business College

Chao Wu, Jiangxi Agricultural University

Nanchang Business College

References

Brown, H. Douglas. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. (Second Edition). White Plains, New York: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.

Bourke, James M. (2008). ‘A Rough Guide to Language Awareness’ in English Teaching Forum. Volume 46Number 1. Washington: The Public Affair Office of U.S.

Celce-Murcia. (2001). Marianne. (ed.). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language.(Third Edition). Boston, MA: Heinle.

Dhieb-Henia, Nebila. (2006). ‘Applying Metacognitive Strategies to Skimming Research Articles in an ESP Context’ in English Teaching Forum. Volume 46 Number 1. Washington: The Public Affair Office of U.S.

Gay, L.R. & Airasian, Peter. ( 2000). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. (Sixth Edition). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Gay, L.R., Mills, Geoffrey E., & Airasian, Peter. (2009). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. (Ninth Edition). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Joyce, Bruce., Weil, Marsha., & Showers, Beverly. (1992). Models of Teaching. (Fourth Edition). 5Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Johnson, K. (1996). Language Teaching and Skill Learning. Oxford: Blackwell.

McKay, Sandra Lee & Hornberger, Nancy H. (eds.). (1996). Sociolinguistics and Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

Refnita, Lely. (2016). ‘A Current Portrait of Students’ Learning Strategies’ (unpublished research report). Padang: Fakultas Keguruandan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Bung Hatta.

Tomlinson, Brian. (ed.). (2007). Developing Materials for Language Teaching. London: The Tower Building.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-01

Issue

Section

Articles