Exploring Metaphorical Cancers in Arabic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1409.31Keywords:
cancer, metaphor, Arabic, discourse, corporaAbstract
In Arabic, the metaphoricity of cancer disease has received some research, particularly from the perspective of a target domain. However, cancer from the perspective of a source domain awaits systematic analysis. To fill this gap, this paper has the following aims: 1) To explore the types of phenomena that correspond to cancer as a metaphor in Arabic from the perspective a source domain; and 2) To discuss the factors that might influence and/or sustain the use of cancer as a metaphor from the perspective of a source domain and its implications in Arabic. The analysis and findings of two Arabic corpora (King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology Arabic Corpus and the Arabic corpus of Brigham Young University) showed the emergence of ten topic areas and themes that correspond to cancer as a metaphor in Arabic from the perspective a source domain, ordered from the most to least frequent: ISRAEL, CORRUPTION, VIOLENCE/TERRORISM/CONFLICT, PEOPLE/GROUP(S) OF PEOPLE, IDEOLOGY/RELIGION/ BELIEF, COGNITION/EMOTION/SENSATION, ARCHITECTURE/ENVIRONMENT, FINANCE/ ECONOMY/POVERTY, UNCLASSIFIED, and PLACE/LOCATION/COUNTRY. The following factors might impact and/or perpetuate the use of this metaphor in the Arabic discourse: 1) the negative correspondences between cancer disease and the described phenomena as metaphorical cancers grounded in 2) the embodied and real-world experiences and shared knowledge and understandings of cancer disease, and 3) the socio-political unrest in the Middle East region and its consequences of financial pressures, health challenges, and humanitarian crises.
References
Abaalalaa, H., & Ibrahim, W. (2022). Metaphors of cancer in the Arabic language: An analysis of the use of metaphors in the online narratives of breast cancer patients. Open Linguistics, 8(1), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0184
Almaghlouth, S., & Alotaibi, L. (2024). HEART metaphors in economic discourse corpora: conceptual evidence and translation insight. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2331671. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2331671.
Almegewly, W., & Alsoraihi, M. (2022). "Your ovaries are expired, like an old lady" Metaphor analysis of Saudi Arabian women's descriptions of breast cancer: A qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 924934. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924934.
Balteiro, I. (2017). Metaphor in Ebola’s popularized scientific discourse. Iberica, 34, 209–230.
Brugman, B., Droog, E., Reijnierse, W., Leymann, S., Frezza, G., & Renardel de Lavalette, K. (2022). Audience Perceptions of COVID-19 Metaphors: The Role of Source Domain and Country Context. Metaphor and Symbol, 37(2), 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1948332
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The Discourse Dynamics Approach to Metaphor and Metaphor-Led Discourse Analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 63–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480902830821
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612
Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Springer.
Cotter, C., Samos, D., & Swinglehurst, D. (2021). Framing obesity in public discourse: Representation through metaphor across text type. Journal of Pragmatics, 174, 14-27.
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Deignan, A., Littlemore, J., & Semino, E. (2013). Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hendricks, R. K., Demjén, Z., Semino, E., & Boroditsky, L. (2018). Emotional implications of metaphor: Consequences of metaphor framing for mindset about cancer. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(4), 267–279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1549835
Isaeva, E. and Burdina, O. (2019). Transdiscursive term transformation: The evidence from cognitive discursive research of the term ‘virus’. In I. Ferrando (Eds.), Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse (pp. 79-109). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110629460-005
Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from. Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Mobarki, Y., & Alzahrani, F. (2024). Sports fanaticism as a disease: a Corpus-based study of metaphors in Saudi newspapers. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1286395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1286395
Mu'jam alma'aanii [The Dictionary of Meanings]. Retrieved October 21, 2023 from https://www.almaany.com/
Musolff, A. (2016). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. London/New York: Bloomsbury.
Negro, I. (2016). The human being as the target of crisis metaphors in English, Spanish and French. Metaphor and the Social World, 6(2), 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.2.01neg
O'Brien, G. (2003) Indigestible Food, Conquering Hordes, and Waste Materials: Metaphors of Immigrants and the Early Immigration Restriction Debate in the United States, Metaphor and Symbol, 18:1, 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1801_3
Olza, I., Koller, V., Ibarrexte-Antuñano, I., Pérez-Sobrino, P., & Semino, E. (2021). The# ReframeCovid initiative: From Twitter to society via metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World, 11(1), 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00013.olz
Pelosi, A., Pedroso de Moraes Feltes, H., & Cameron, L. (2014). Urban violence in Brazil and the role of the media: Communicative effects of systematic metaphors in discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 4(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.4.1.02pel
Potts, A., & Semino, E. (2019). Cancer as a Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2019.1611723
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752
Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, J., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU (Vol. 14). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Steen, G. (2017). Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0001
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: the role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS One, 6(2), e16782. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
Thibodeau, P., Hendricks, R., & Boroditsky, L. (2017). How linguistic metaphor scaffolds reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(11), 852–863. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.07.001
Wehling, E. (2016). Moral disgust at its best: The important role of low-level mappings and structural parallelism in political disgust and disease metaphors. In E. Gola, & F. Evras (Eds.), Metaphor and communication (pp. 189-200). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing
Woodhams, J. M. (2012). A journey towards employment: Metaphorical representations of social welfare in New Zealand. Metaphor and the Social World, 2(1), 41-60.
Zibin, A. (2020). A corpus-based study of metaphors used to describe Syrian refugees in Jordanian politico-economic discourse: A critical metaphor analysis approach. Pragmatics and Society, 11(4), 640-663. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.17037.zib
