Cases of Women’s Hate Speech Due to the Use of Taboo Language on Social Media

Authors

  • Sutarsih Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Subyantoro Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Hari Bakti Mardikantoro Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Tommi Yuniawan Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1409.17

Keywords:

taboo language, woman, social media, cases, hate speech

Abstract

Cases of hate speech linked to Indonesian women using taboo language on social media have risen, leading to many Indonesian women being subjected to criminal penalties. Therefore, research on taboo language must be conducted to resolve cybercrimes. This study discloses the type, category, and adverse effects of using taboo language from a legal perspective. The data were verdicts downloaded from the Supreme Court’s directory. Data were analyzed using the intralingual equivalence method to examine linguistic features such as meaning, information, and speech context. Linguistic forensics was also applied to focus on the language that generates legal cases based on the Indonesian cultural environment according to Jay’s classification of taboos. The results of the study revealed that the women on social media utilized prohibited language, including hate speech in Indonesian and indigenous languages. The taboo languages used by women on social media categorized as cases of hate speech were: 1) sexual references, 2) profane or blasphemous, 3) animal names, 4) ethnic-racial-gender slurs, and 5) references to perceived psychological, physical, or social deviations. The negative impact of using taboo language by women on social media from a legal perspective is a hate speech crime that violates the Indonesian Electronic Information and Transactions Law. This research contributes to handling legal cases by imposing language, gender stereotype theory, and taboo language as potential evidence in hate speech cases.

References

Affini, L. N. (2017). Analisis Kata Tabu dan Klasifikasinya di Lirik Lagu Eminem pada Album The Marshal Mathers [Analysis of taboo words and their classification in Eminem’s song lyrics on the album The Marshal Mathers]. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan dan Budaya, 7(1), 93–113.

Ariani, M. G., Sajedi, F., and Sajedi, M. (2014). Forensic linguistics: A brief overview of the key elements. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 222–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.078.

Baror, S. O. and Venter, H. S. (2019). A taxonomy for cybercrime attack in the public cloud. 14th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, ICCWS 2019, 505–515.

Blaya, C. (2019). Cyberhate: A Review and Content Analysis of Intervention Strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.006.

Boucher, A and Perkins, R. (2020). The Case of Sherlock Holmes and Linguistic Analysis. English Literature in Transition, 63(1), 77–98.

Brodersen, E. (2019). Taboo, Personal and Collective Representations: Origin and Positioning within Cultural Complexes (Vol. 1). Routledge.

Chatzakou, D., Leontiadis, I., Blackburn, J., De Cristofaro, E., Stringhini, G., Vakali, A., and Kourtellis, N. (2019). Detecting Cyberbullying and Cyberaggression in Social Media. ACM Transactions on the Web, 13(3), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343484.

Clarke, I. (2019). Functional Linguistic Variation in Twitter Trolling. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 26(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.34803.

Colbran, M. P. (2018). Policing, Social Media, and the New Media Landscape: Can the Police and the Traditional Media Ever Successfully Bypass Each Other? Policing and Society, 30(3), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2018.1532426.

Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., and Wright, D. (2016). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence (1st ed.). Routledge.

Curiel, R. P., Cresci, S., Muntean, C. L., and Bishop, S. R. (2020). Crime and Its Fear in Social Media. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0430-7.

Fraser, H. (2014). Transcription of Indistinct Forensic Recordings: Problems and Solutions from the Perspective of Phonetic Science. Language and Law, 1(2), 5–21.

Gierth, L., and Bromme, R. (2020). Attacking Science on Social Media: How User Comments Affect Perceived Trustworthiness and Credibility. Public Understanding of Science, 29(2), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519889275.

Habiburrahim, Rahmiati, Z., Muluk, S., Akmal, S., and Aziz, Z. A. (2020). Language, Identity, and Ideology: Analysing Aceh Sharia Law Implementation Discourse. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 599–607. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i3.23210.

Handono, P. Y. (2018). “Gaya Bahasa Komentar dalam Akun Instagram “Mimi Peri Rapunchelle” [The style of Comments on the Instagram Account “Mimi Peri Rapunchelle] Linguista, 2(2), 97–105. http://doi.org/10.25273/linguista.v2i2.3697.

Hipp, J. R., Bates, C., Lichman, M., and Smyth, P. (2019). Using social media to measure temporal ambient population: Does it help explain local crime rates? Justice Quarterly, 36(4), 718–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1445276.

Idemaru, K., Winter, B., Brown, L., and Oh, G. E. (2020). Loudness trumps pitch in politeness judgments: Evidence from Korean deferential speech. Language and Speech, 63(1), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918824344.

Jaki, S. (2019). Online Hatred of Women<? Br?> in the Incels. Me Forum: Linguistic Analysis and Automatic Detection. In Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, Vol. 7, Issue 2, pp. 240–268. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00026.jak.

Jay, T. (2009). The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01115.x.

Kuntjara, E. (2003). Gender, Bahasa, dan Kekuasaan [Gender, Language, and Power]. (I). Gunung Mulia.

Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and Woman’s place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45–80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4166707.

Lee, J. C. L., Teh, P. L., Lau, S. L., and Pak, I. (2019). Compilation of Malay Criminological Terms from Online News. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 15(1), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v15.i1.pp355-364.

Lev-On, A. and Steinfield, Ni. (2020). “Objection, Your Honor”: Use of Social Media by Civilians to Challenge the Criminal Justice System. Social Science Computer Review, 38(3), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318771523.

Lia, N. A. (2021). Demokrasi Virtual dan Hasrat dalam Menyampaikan Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial Instagram [Virtual Democracy and the Desire to Convey Hate Speech on Social Media Instagram]. Jurnal An-Nida, 13(1), 51–68.

Lubis, E. E. (2014). Potret Media Sosial dan Perempuan [Portrait of Social Media and Women]. PARALLELA, 1(2), 97–106.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2022). Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia [Directory of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia]. Retrieved August 11, 2023, from https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html.

Mahsun. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan, Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya [Language Research Methods: Stages, Strategies, Methods and Techniques]. (Vol. 9). Rajawali Pers. www.rajagrafindo.co.id.

Mardikantoro, H. B. (2016). Pemertahanan Bahasa Jawa dalam Pertunjukan Kesenian Tradisonal di Jawa Tengah [Maintaining the Javanese Language in Traditional Arts Performances in Central Java]. LITERA, 15(2), 269–280.

Nazifa, N. A., Fook, C. Y., Chin, L. C., Vijean, V., and Kheng, E. S. (2019). Gender Prediction by Speech Analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1372(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1372/1/012011.

Ningjue, Z. (2010). Taboo language on the Internet: An analysis of gender differences in using taboo language. Kristianstad University.

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi elektronik [Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2024 concerning Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions]. In UU No. 1 tahun 2024 (pp. 1–39).

Putri, S. D. A., Ibrohim, M. O., and Budi Indra. (2021). Abusive language and hate speech detection for Javanese and Sundanese languages in tweets: Dataset and preliminary study. 2021 11th International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering, WCSE 2021, 10(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.18178/wcse.2021.02.011.

Resticka, G. A. and Nurdiyanto, E. (2020). Kata Tabu dalam Bahasa Indonesia yang Mempunyai Makna Pelacuran (Kajian Leksikografi) [The Word Taboo in Indonesian which Means Prostitution (lexicographic study)]. Prosiding Semnas LPPM Onsoed, 169–178.

Seyari, A. and Bagheri, M. S. (2019). Perspectives of Forensic Linguistics Research in Iran 1. Journal of Language Horizons, 3(1), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2019.27858.1172.

Sharqawi, M. A. and Anthony, E. M. (2020). Analyzing Gender Effect on the Speech Act of Suggestion: A Pilot Study. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 9(4), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2020-0062.

Sousa-Silva, R. (2018). Computational Forensic Linguistics: An Overview of Computational Applications in Forensic Contexts. Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito, 5(2), 114–143.

Subyantoro, S. and Apriyanto, S. (2020). Impoliteness in Indonesian language hate speech on social media contained in the Instagram Account. Journal of Advances in Linguistics, 11(2), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.24297/jal.v11i.8655.

Suryani, Y., Istianingrum, R., and Hanik, S. U. (2021). Linguistik forensik ujaran kebencian terhadap artis Aurel Hermansyah di media sosial Instagram [Forensic linguistics of hate speech against artist Aurel Hermansyah on Instagram social media]. BELAJAR BAHASA: Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.32528/bb.v6i1.4167.

Susanto and Deri Sis Nanda. (2020). Dimensi analisis bahasa dalam linguistik forensik [Dimensions of language analysis in forensic linguistics]. IJFL (International Journal of Forensic Linguistics), 1(1), 17–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.22225/.2.1.1603.1-6.

Wainira, M. A. D., Liliweri, Y. K. N., and Mandaru, S. S. E. (2021). Pemanfaatan Instagram sebagai media komunikasi pemasaran dalam membangun brand image (Studi deskriptif kualitatif pada akun @kopipapaganteng) [Utilisation of Instagram as a marketing communication medium in building brand image (Qualitative descriptive study on the @kopipapaganteng account)]. Communio, 10(2), 140–150.

Waruwu, D. F. M., and Vera, N. (2020). Ujaran kebencian di media sosial (studi netnografi di akun Instagram @prof.tjokhowie) [Hate speech on social media (netnographic study on the Instagram account @prof.tjokhowie)]. AGUNA: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(1), 55–69.

Yunita, M., Simanjuntak, H., and Jupitasari, M. (2022). Kata-kata tabu (mali) dalam bahasa Dayak Kubitn di Serawai [Taboo words (mali) in the Dayak Kubitn language in Serawai]. Katulistiwa, 11(5), 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v11i5.54533.

Zhuravel, V. A. (2020). Criminalistics’ language: Concept-terminological apparatus formation. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 27(1), 162-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.37635/jnalsu.27(1).2020.162-176.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-12

Issue

Section

Articles