Independent Writing Tasks vs. Integrated Writing Tasks: The Cognitive Demands and Their Impacts on Linguistic Complexity in EFL Writing

Authors

  • Ziming Zhao Universiti Putra Malaysia
  • Vahid Nimehchisalem Universiti Putra Malaysia
  • Mei Yuit Chan Universiti Putra Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1408.33

Keywords:

cognitive demands, integrated writing task, independent writing task, linguistic complexity, EFL writing

Abstract

Despite many studies investigating the effects of task complexity on L2 writing performance, little attention has been given to the specific effects of independent vs. integrated writing tasks and their cognitive demands on EFL learners. This study aimed to address this gap by conducting a comprehensive examination of the cognitive demands exerted by these two types of writing tasks and their effects on linguistic complexity outcomes among 35 Chinese EFL learners. Employing mixed methods involving learner self-ratings, expert judgments, and dual-task measures, the study revealed that, compared to the independent writing task, the integrated writing task places higher cognitive demands on students. In terms of written performance, participants demonstrated enhancements in lexical and syntactic complexity when responding to the integrated writing task, supporting Robinson’s Cognition Hypothesis (CH). These findings highlight the importance of understanding the cognitive load imposed by different types of writing tasks and offer implications for educators in the design and sequencing of writing tasks within Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) contexts.

Author Biographies

Ziming Zhao, Universiti Putra Malaysia

Department of English, Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication

Vahid Nimehchisalem, Universiti Putra Malaysia

Department of English, Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication

Mei Yuit Chan, Universiti Putra Malaysia

Department of English, Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication

References

Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2016). Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 639-668.

Brown, J. D., Hudson, T., Norris. J. M., & Bonk, W. (2002). An investigation of second language task-based performance assessments (Technical Report No. 24). University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.

Brunken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 53-61.

Cierniak, G., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2009). Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 315-324.

Cumming, A., Lai, C., & Cho, H. (2016). Students' writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 47-58.

Declerck, M., & Kormos, J. (2012). The effect of dual task demands and proficiency on second language speech production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 782 – 796.

DeKeyser, R. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195 – 221.

Frear, M. W., & Bitchener, J. (2015). The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 45-57.

Golparvar, S. E., & Azizsahra, M. (2023). The effect of graph complexity and planning on graph writing performance and descriptive strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 56(1), 117-143.

Golparvar, S. E., & Rashidi, F. (2021). The effect of task complexity on integrated writing performance: The case of multiple-text source-based writing. System, 99, 102524, 1-14.

Guo, L., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study. Assessing Writing, 18(3), 218-238.

Johnson, M. D. (2017). Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 37, 13–38.

Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2011). Task complexity and linguistic performance in L2 writing and speaking. In Task-based Language Teaching (pp. 91-104). Cambridge University Press.

Lee, J. (2021). Task closure and task complexity effects on L2 written performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100777, 1-17.

Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474-496.

Lu, X. (2011). A corpus‐based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college‐level ESL writers' language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36-62.

McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381-392.

Murphy, L., & de Larios, J. R. (2010). Searching for words: One strategic use of the mother tongue by advanced Spanish EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(2), 61-81.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555-578.

Ong, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2010). Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’ argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 218-233.

Payant, C., McDonough, K., Uludag, P., & Lindberg, R. (2019). Predicting integrated writing task performance: Source comprehension, prewriting planning, and individual differences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 40, 87-97.

Plakans, L. (2009). Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment. Language Testing, 26(4), 561-587.

Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2017). Exploring the relationship of organization and connection with scores in integrated writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 31, 98-112.

Rahimi, M. (2019). Effects of increasing the degree of reasoning and the number of elements on L2 academic writing. Language Teaching Research, 23(5), 633-654.

Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2018). Effects of task complexity and planning conditions on L2 argumentative writing production. Discourse Processes, 55(8), 726-742.

Révész, A. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures, Language Learning, 62(1), 93–132.

Révész, A., Kourtali, N. E., & Mazgutova, D. (2017). Effects of task complexity on L2 writing behaviors and linguistic complexity. Language Learning, 67(1), 208-241.

Révész, A., Sachs, R., & Hama, M. (2014). The effects of task complexity and input frequency on the acquisition of the past counterfactual construction through recasts. Language Learning, 64(3), 615-650.

Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: exploring Interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27-57.

Robinson, P. (2001a). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In Cambridge University Press eBooks (pp. 287–318).

Robinson, P. (2003). The cognitive hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21(2), 45-105.

Robinson, P. (2005b). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43(1), 1-32.

Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(3), 193-213.

Robinson, P. (2011a). Task Based Language Learning: A review of issues. Language Learning, 61(s1), 1-36.

Sasayama, S. (2016). Is a ‘complex’ task really complex? Validating the assumption of cognitive task complexity. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 231-254.

Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1996). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185-211.

Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1998). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retelling. Language Learning, 49(1), 93-120.

Weigle, S. C., & Parker, K. (2012). Source text borrowing in an integrated reading/writing assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 118-133.

Xu, W., Zhao, P., Yao, Y., Pang, W., & Zhu, X. (2023). Effects of self-efficacy on integrated writing performance: A cross-linguistic perspective. System, 115, 103065.

Zhang, J. (2018). The effect of strategic planning training on cohesion in EFL learners’ essays. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(6), 554-567.

Zhang, Y., & Ouyang, J. (2023). Linguistic complexity as the predictor of EFL independent and integrated writing quality. Assessing Writing, 56, 100727, 1-12.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-09

Issue

Section

Articles