Shadows of Language: Revealing the Multifaceted Nature of Euphemistic Expressions in Biden’s Speeches

Authors

  • Ali S. Humood University of Babylon
  • Wafaa M. Faisal University of Babylon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1408.24

Keywords:

critical pragmatics, euphemism, ideology, power, political euphemism

Abstract

In the field of political discourse, euphemistic expressions arise as a linguistic strategy. They are utilized by politicians to cleverly navigate the challenges of achieving their intended goals, such as promoting themselves or criticizing others. The present study delves into the neglected dimensions of euphemisms used by

President Biden when he speaks about the local and global affairs. To do so, six carefully selected extracts from Biden’s speeches are examined drawing upon Burridge’s classification of linguistic features and functions of euphemistic expressions, van Dijk’s ideological square, Brown and Levinson’s negative politeness strategies, Grice’s conversational maxims, and French and Raven’s bases of power. The study unfolds significant emphasis on the positive ideological shifts under the current American leadership, contrasting them with the negative underpinnings of others. Accordingly, the function to talk up and inflate serves euphemistic expressions to function as a vehicle for projecting positive representations. Moreover, it is found that to reveal and inspire function is utilized for revealing truths and inspiring profound shifts in perception. Power bases lend legitimacy and authorize Biden to employ such linguistic choices, further amplifying the impact of his intended message.

Author Biographies

Ali S. Humood, University of Babylon

Department of English, College of Education for Human Sciences

Wafaa M. Faisal, University of Babylon

Department of English, College of Education for Human Sciences

References

Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism & dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. Oxford University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Burridge, K. (2012). Euphemism and language change: The sixth and seventh ages. Lexis, 7. https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.355

Chen, X. (2020). Critical pragmatic studies on Chinese public discourse. Routledge.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218

Crespo Fernández, E. (2005). Euphemistic strategies in politeness and face concerns. Pragmalinguistica, 13, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2005.i13.05

Daghigh, A. J., Saleh Sanatifar, M., & Awang, R. (2018). Modeling van Dijk’s Ideological Square in Translation Studies: Investigating Manipulation in Political Discourse Translation. In TRAlinea: Online Translation Journal, 20.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.

French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power. University of Michigan Press.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003

Huang, Y. (Ed.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of pragmatics (First edition). Oxford University Press.

Hughes, G. (2006). An encyclopedia of swearing: The social history of oaths, profanity, foul language, and ethnic slurs in the English-speaking world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315706412

Mey, J. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishers.

Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis: An introduction (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Pan, Q. (2013). A tentative study on the functions and applications of English euphemism. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(11), 2107–2111. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.11.2107-2111

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage Publications.

Xiao, T. (2018). The functions and expressions of English euphemism in business negotiation. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Arts, Design and Contemporary Education (ICADCE 2018). 4th International Conference on Arts, Design and Contemporary Education (ICADCE 2018), Zhengzhou, China. https://doi.org/10.2991/icadce-18.2018.25

Zhao, X., & Dong, J. (2010). Study on the features of English political euphemism and its social functions. English Language Teaching, 3(1), p118. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n1p118

Downloads

Published

2024-08-09

Issue

Section

Articles