Language Education Policy of Distance Learning Classes of Teaching English as a Foreign Language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1408.17Keywords:
language education policy, first language, second language, distance learning classes, English as a foreign languageAbstract
This is a quantitative study that focuses on the language education policy of distance learning classes with particular attention to the policies regarding the use of the first language in teaching the second language. Previous studies show that the viewpoint of teachers and students, who are involved in distance learning, towards policies of the English language departments of Saudi universities has not been explored before. The main objective of this paper is investigating teachers’ and students’ awareness of the English department’s policy regarding L1 in distance learning classes and the participants’ attitudes towards using L1 in the distance learning classes of L2. Teachers of English as a foreign language with various academic ranks and undergraduate students from different colleges took part in this study. The main research tool of this study is an online questionnaire. The same questionnaire was given to the two types of participants. Data analysis shows that the majority of the participants were not familiar with the policy of the English language department regarding the use of L1 in distance learning classes. Data analysis indicates that both teachers and students acknowledged that they use L1 in the distance learning classes. On the other hand, half of the teachers contended that L1 enhances students’ comprehension in the distance learning classes whereas the vast majority of the students supported this argument. Policy-makers in the English language department are invited to implement an “English-mainly” policy that perceives students as bilinguals.
References
Almayez, M. (2022). Translanguaging at a Saudi University: discrepancy between English language teachers’ attitudes and self-reported pedagogical practices. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00148-3
Alomaim, T. I. (2019). Language education policy and language practices in teaching English as a foreign language in a Saudi newly established university: An interpretive case study [PhD]. University of Birmingham.
Alomaim, T. I., & Altameemi, Y. M. (2022). Saudi students’ perspective towards language education policy of using the first language in teaching the second language. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00146-5
Altameemi, Y. M., & Alomaim, T. I. (2022). Analysing Assistance Discourse Provided to Stakeholders to Utilize E-Learning in the Higher Education. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 11(52), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.52.04.34
Alzahrani, A. A., & Abu Sheirah, K. (2021). Utilizing the Blackboard Learning Management System at the University of Ha’il from the Perspective of Faculty Members using Internet of Things (IOT). International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 14, 214–222. https://doi.org/10.46300/9109.2020.14.23
Baldauf, R. B. (2005). Language planning and policy research: An overview. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 957–970). Routledge.
Butzkamm, W. (2003). We only learn language once. The role of the mother tongue in FL classrooms: Death of a dogma. The Language Learning Journal, 28(1), 29–39.
Cooper, R. L. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge University Press.
Eldridge, J. (1996). Code-switching in a Turkish secondary school. ELT Journal, 50(4), 303–311.
Ellis, R. (1984). Classroom second language development: A study of classroom interaction and language acquisition. Pergamon.
Ferguson, G. (2006). Language planning and education. Edinburgh University Press.
Franklin, C. E. M. (1990). Teaching in the target language: Problems and prospects. Language Learning Journal, 2(1), 20–24.
García, O. (2015). Language Policy. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 353–359). Elsevier.
Garton, S. (2014). Unresolved issues and new challenges in teaching English to young learners: The case of South Korea. Current Issues in Language Planning, 15(2), 201–219.
Greggio, S., & Gil, G. (2007). Teacher’s and learners’ use of code switching in the English as a foreign language classroom: A qualitative study. Linguagem & Ensino, 10(2), 371–393.
Hall, G., & Cook, G. (2012). Own-language use in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 45(3), 271–308.
Harbord, J. (1992). The use of the mother tongue in the classroom. ELT Journal, 64(4), 350–355.
Haugen, E. (1959). Planning for a standard language in modern Norway. Anthropological Linguistics, 1(3), 8–21.
Hoffmann, C. (1991). An introduction to bilingualism. Longman.
Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the Onion Ethnographically: Layers and Spaces in Multilingual Language Education Policy and Practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509–532.
Hornberger, N. H., & Link, H. (2012). Translanguaging and transnational literacies in multilingual classrooms: A biliteracy lens. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 261–278.
Jakobsson, C., & Rydén, H. (2010). A study of code-switching in four Swedish EFL-classrooms [Masters]. Malmö University.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Liebscher, G., & Dailey-O’Cain, J. (2005). Learner code-switching in the content-based foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 234–247.
Lo Bianco, J. (2010). Language policy and planning. In N. H. Hornberger & S. L. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Education (pp. 143–174). Multilingual Matters.
McMillan, B. A., & Rivers, D. J. (2011). The practice of policy: Teacher attitudes toward “English only”. System, 39, 251–263.
Paulston, C. B., & Heidemann, K. (2006). Language policies and the education of linguistic minorities. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method (pp. 292–310). Blackwell Publishing.
Qian, X., Tian, G., & Wang, Q. (2009). Codeswitching in the primary EFL classroom in China- Two case studies. System, 37, 719–730.
Raschka, C., Sercombe, P., & Chi-Ling, H. (2009). Conflicts and tensions in codeswitching in a Taiwanese EFL classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(2), 157–171.
Rezvani, E., & Rasekh, A. E. (2011). Code-switching in Iranian elementary EFL classrooms: An exploratory investigation. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 18–25.
Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Routledge.
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge University Press.
The Saudi Council of Higher Education. (2007). The Saudi Council of Higher Education and Universities regulations. Ministry of higher education.
The Saudi Ministry of Education. (1995). Education Policy in Saudi Arabia. Ministry of Education.
Tien, C. (2009). Conflict and accommodation in classroom codeswitching in Taiwan. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(2), 173–192.
Turnbull, M., & Dailey-O’Cain, J. (2009). Introduction. In First Language Use in Second and Foreign Language Learning (pp. 1–14). Multilingual Matters.
