A Stylistic Pragmatics Perspective on Metaphors of Emotive Words in Anak Bajang Menggiring Angin

Authors

  • R. Kunjana Rahardi Sanata Dharma University
  • Yuliana Setyaningsih Sanata Dharma University
  • Wahyudi Rahmatika Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat
  • Nor Hazwani Munirah Lateh Universiti Malaysia Kelantan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1408.14

Keywords:

emotive words, literary work, metaphors, stylistic pragmatics

Abstract

There remains to be a scarcity of pragmatic studies that rely on analysis tools in the literary dimension. It is also deemed not too important to relate the linguistics field to understanding the beauty and metaphoric meanings in the literature. This study describes the metaphors in emotive phrases from a pragmatic stylistic standpoint and their pragmatic connotations. This study identified symbolic utterances of a novel's emotive terms. Thus, this study relied on novel excerpts with metaphorical emotive word meanings. Sindhunata's Gramedia Pustaka Utama book Anak Bajang Menggiring Angin provided source data. The data were collected by observation and then analyzed using distributional analysis. The extralinguistic dimensions of this study were analyzed via a contextual method, especially the extra-lingual equivalent method. This study found anthropomorphic, abstract, and animal imagery analogies. The collected data shows that metaphors have four pragmatic meanings: connotative, emotive, introspective, and collocative. Understanding these meanings is not just confined to a purely literary perspective, as literature and language are like two-sided coins; one field cannot be separated from the other. So, there will be more literary studies with an interdisciplinary perspective on literature and linguistics in the future.

References

Alexander, J. C. (2006). Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy. Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, 9780521857956(4), 29–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616839.002

Ariyati, R. P., Rahmat, W., & Putri, F. R. (2018). Kias in Short Story Collection “Satu Hari Bukan di Hari Minggu” by Yetti A.KA, A Semantic Analysis Approach. Curricula : Journal of Teaching and Learning, 3(3), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.22216/jcc.2018.v3i3.3574

Blanks, R. G. (2011). Estimation of disease severity in the NHS cervical screening programme. Part I: Artificial cutoff points and semi-quantitative solutions. Cytopathology, 22(3), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.2010.00813.x

Caffi, C., & Janney, R. W. (1994). Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 22(3–4), 325–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90115-5

Cesaria, A., Kemal, E., & Rahmat, W. (2022). Student Errors in Writing the English Mathematical Operation in Higher Education. Curricula : Journal of Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.22216/curricula.v7i2.1366

Clark, B. (1996). Stylistic analysis and relevance theory. Language and Literature, 5(3), 163–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709600500302

Debi, F., Saputra, A. D., & Saddhono, K. (2023). Discourse on Artistic Evidence and the Five Canons of Rhetoric in the 2022 National Education Day Speech. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 03(02), 137–149.

Dewaele, Jean-Marc, & Li, C. (2020). Emotions in Second Language Acquisition: a critical review and research agenda. Foreign Language World, 196(1), 34–49.

Ephratt, M. (2008). The functions of silence. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(11), 1909–1938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.009

Faisol, Y., & Rahmat, W. (2021). Cyberactivism in Palestinian Conflict News Comments on Al-Jezeera Youtube Channel: a Cyberpragmatic Study (Aktivisme Siber Dalam Komentar Berita Konflik Palestina Di Kanal Youtube Al-Jazeera: Kajian Siberpragmatik). Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian PendidikanBahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(2), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2021.v7i2.4954

Gal, S. (1989). Between speech and silence. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics, 3(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1075/iprapip.3.1.01gal

Geoffrey Leech. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford University Press.

Giordano, C. (2016). Pragmatic Competence and Relevance. System, 56, 144–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.12.009

Goddard, C. (2004). The ethnopragmatics and semantics of “active metaphors”. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1211–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.011

Gusthini, M., & Istiningdias, D. S. (2024). DKI Jakarta’s Regional Government Speech Act Analysis and Public Response to Air Pollution Issue on Instagram Platform. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 4(01), 1–10.

Haula, B., & Nur, T. (2019). Konseptualisasi Metafora Dalam Rubrik Opini Kompas: Kajian Semantik Kognitif. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 12(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v12i1.7375

Kartika, D., Rahardi, R. K., Aziz, M., & Rahmat, W. (2023). Depicting reflections of power on illocutionary acts of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzō Abe’s speeches on Covid -19. 13(2), 284–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i2.63078

Kunjana Rahardi, R. (2023). Social–Societal Context Element Changes in Cyberpragmatics Perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(11), 2771–2779. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1311.06

Lemke, J. L. (1991). Talking science: language, learning, and values. In Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 28, Issue 09). https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.28-5211

Maffi, L. (2005). Linguistic, cultural and biological diversity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 599–617. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120437

Maryelliwati, Rahmat, W., & Kemal, E. (2018). A Reality of Minangkabau Language and Literature and Its Transformation to a Creation of Performance Works. Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(1), 62–70.

Mayori, S. P., Tiawati, R. L., & Rahmat, W. (2023). Cross-Cultural Understanding of BIPA International Students at Andalas University. Journal of Humanity Studies, 2(2), 125–130.

Mulyaningsih, I., Rahmat, W., Maknun, D., & Firdaus, W. (2022). How Competence of Production, Attention, Retention, Motivation, and Innovation Can Improve Students’ Scientific Writing Skills. International Journal of Language Education, 6(4), 368–385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i4.34360

Nurlina, W. E. S., & Riani. (2022). The Phenomenon Of Language On Streets Banners During Ramadan And Eid Al Fitr: Speech Act Study. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr/v2i1.203

Pristianingrum, S., & Damayanti, R. (2022). Pragmatic Dimension of Semiotics in Song Lyrics Dimensi Pragmatik Dalam Semiotika Pada Lirik Lagu. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2(2), 98–107. https://jurnal.ppjb-sip.org/index.php/jpdr/index

Putri, N. A., Tiawati, R. L., & Nitia, S. D. (2023). Exploring Mistake of Language Discourse That Arises When Learners of Indonesian For Foreign Speaker ( BIPA ) Fatoni University. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 03(01), 59–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr.v3i1.342

Rahardi, K. (2016). Personal and Communal Assumptions to Determine Pragmatic Meanings of Phatic Functions. Lingua Cultura, 10(2), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v10i2.897

Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2019a). Contexts as The Determining Roles of Javanese Phatic ‘Monggo’: Culture-Specific Pragmatics Perspective. Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 5(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v5i1.5035

Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2019b). Pragmatic perspective on phatic functions and language dignity. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.E1039.0585C19

Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2022). Triadicities of Indonesian Phatic Functions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(12), 2641–2650. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1212.22

Rahardi, R. Kunjana, Rahmat, W., & Kurniawan, Y. (2023). Pseudo-Directive Speech Act in the Javanese Language: Culture-Specific Pragmatic Perspective. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 66(11), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_jslhr-23-00223

Rahardi, R K. (2018). Phatic Language in a Specific Culture Perspective in the Context of Internationalization of the Indonesian Language. KnE Social Sciences, 3(9), 568–575. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i9.2720

Rahmat, W., Fitriyah, R., Zulfa, Z., Riza, A., Afrinda, P. D., Fitri, R., & Pebriani, Y. (2023). Learning Foreign Language Towards Its Media and Identity To Motivate Student’s Personal Growth. Studies in Media and Communication, 11(7), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v11i7.6440

Rahmat, W., Lateh, N. H. M., & Kurniawan, Y. (2022). How Do the Women Control Their Language Facing Certain Condition ? a Perspective of Psychopragmatics. International Journal of Language Education, 6(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i1.30752

Rahmat, W., Lateh, N. H. M., & Kurniawan, Y. (2023). Visualizing Psychopragmatic : Method of Analysis of Cultural Identity Learning for Sociocultural Language Researchers. INSANIAH: Online Journal of Language, Communication, and Humanities, 6(2), 83–95.

Rahmat, W., Putra, L. D., & Fitriyah, R. (2023). How do the Ethnicity Minangkabau Male Express Their Masculinity in Language : A Identity Point of View. Culture & Psychology, 0(0), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X231201389

Rahmat, W., Revita, I., & Fitriyah, R. (2019). Psychopragmatic Analysis in Language Learning and Teaching Processes. Curricula, 4(2), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.22216/jcc.2019.v4i2.4218

Rahmat, W., Tiawati, R. L., Kemal, E., Tatalia, R. G., Azri, H., & Wulandari, Y. (2023). How Do the Young People Picture Out Their Use , Activeness , and Connectivity on Social Media ? A Discourse Analysis Approach. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599231174848

Reflinaldi, Faisol, Y., Hadi, S., & Ilyas, E. (2024). How to Build Strategic Communication : Speech Act Analysis on King Salman’s Speeches at the United Nations General Assembly. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 4(01), 11–21.

Riswani, Efrinon, Alfalah, Firdaus, & Jufri. (2023). How Local Art Reveals Local Genius In The Corner Of The Discourse Point of View. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 03(01), 103–110.

Robinson, D. C. (2000). Metaphors of Love, Love as Metaphor: Language, Ritual and Moral Agency in the Theological Politics of Identity. Theology & Sexuality, 6(12), 72–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/135583580000601205

Sari, N., Rahmat, W., & Samsiarni. (2021). News of Violence In Posmetro Padang Daily, A Study of Discourse Analysis. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 1(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdrv1i1.132

Setyaningsih, Y., & Rahardi, R. K. (2019). Quality of arguments used in the first-round presidential debate: Critical pragmatics and Stephen Toulmin’s perspective. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5), 716–725. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.E1102.0585C19

Setyaningsih, Y., & Rahardi, R. K. (2020). Argument Constellation in Journal Articles: Toulmin Stephen Perspective (Konstelasi Argumen Dalam Artikel Jurnal: Perspektif Stephen Toulmin). Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2020.v6i2.4079

Sindhunata. (1999). Anak Bajang Menggiring Angin (Anak Bajang Herding the Wind). Gramedia.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind and Language, 17(1–2), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00186

Sultan, Rapi, M., Basri, M. B., Mangila, B. B., & Rahmat, W. (2023). Texts and Tasks in Indonesian Language Textbooks: Do They Support Indonesian Students in the International Reading Literacy Test? International Journal of Language Education, 7(3), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v7i3.56017

Tiawati, R. L., Kurnia, M., Anisa, W., & Harahap, S. H. (2024). Cultural Literacy in Indonesian Language Learning for Foreign Speakers ( BIPA ): Overcoming Barriers and Fostering Language Proficiency with Cross-Cultural Understanding Issues. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 4(01), 22–31.

Tiawati, R. L., Rahmat, W., Kemal, E., & Chen, W. (2022). The Importance of Guidance In Understanding Cultural Discourse In Thinking and Speaking For Foreign Students In BIPA Program. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr/v2i1.203

Verschueren, J., & Östman, J.-O. (2011). Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights. In Philosophical Perspectives for Pragmatics (p. 283).

Wincana, G., Rahmat, W., & Tatalia, R. G. (2022). Linguistic Tendencies of Anorexia Nervosa on Social Media Users. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr/v2i1.185

Yendra, Y., Satria, W., Rahmat, W., Kemal, E., Kusumaningsih, D., Sudiyana, B., Miji Lestari, P., Susanti, R., Agung Ayu Dian Andriyani, A., Susylowati, E., Budi San-toso, A., Bambang Putut Setiyadi, D., Yulianti, W., Widhayani, A., Nur Kholidah, N., Saddhono, K., & PGRI Sumatera Barat, S. (2018). Introduction Blended Learning Designs on Introduction to Linguistics at West Indonesian. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.4), 310–313. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.4.20121

Yusri, R., Muspardi, M., Kemal, E., & Rahmat, W. (2019). Effectiveness of national qualification framework Indonesia based curriculum and higher education national standard behaviour assesment rubric. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042129

Downloads

Published

2024-08-09

Issue

Section

Articles