The Perspectives of English-for-Academic-Purposes Instructors Towards the Transfer Climate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1408.13Keywords:
EAP courses, instructor's perceptions, learning transfer, transfer climateAbstract
This study examines the nature of the transfer climate in an English for academic purposes (EAP) education setting specifically from the perspectives of EAP instructors. The transfer climate refers to the nature of the target context of instruction and the support for learning transfer perceived by a learner in that target context. Therefore, in the case of the EAP education context, the target context of instruction is the discipline courses to which students transition to or take concurrently with EAP courses. These discipline courses may be supportive or unsupportive towards students' transfer of EAP skills. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 EAP instructors. The interview transcripts were analyzed using a process of de-contextualizing and re-contextualizing. Firstly, with decontextualizing, a chunk of text is identified as a unit of analysis and is taken out of context from the transcript. Secondly, all the units can be re-contextualized when transferred from the interview transcript to a single category of units that contribute to a similar pattern towards the research question. The findings revealed that EAP instructors perceived both supportive and unsupportive aspects of different components of the EAP transfer climate [opportunities (lack of) in the course structure, support (lack of) for EAP transfer from discipline instructors or peers in the disciplines]. This study’s findings also build on existing conceptualizations of transfer climate. Practical implications, implications for future research, and limitations are outlined.
References
Burke, L. A., & Baldwin, T. T. (1999). Workforce training transfer: A study of the effect of relapse prevention training and transfer climate. Human Resource Management, 38(3), 227-241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199923)38:3<227::AID-HRM5>3.0.CO;2-M
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage.
Demirkol, T., Bayram, I., & Canaran, O. (2021). Academic language tasks in discipline- specific courses: Insights from three English-medium instruction universities. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 94, 101-124. DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2021.94.5
Detterman, D. K. (1993). The case for the prosecution: Transfer as an epiphenomenon. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 1–24). Ablex Publishing Corp.
Evans, S., & Green, C. (2007). Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.11.005
Fogarty, R., D. Perkins & J. Barell. (1992). How to teach for transfer. Skylight.
Gaffas. (2019). Students’ perceptions of the impact of EGP and ESP courses on their English language development: Voices from Saudi Arabia. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 42, 100797–. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100797
Gilpin-Jackson, Y., & Bushe, G. R. (2007). Leadership development training transfer: A case study of post-training determinants. Journal of Management Development, 26, 980-1004. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710710833423
Harklau, L. (1994). ESL Versus Mainstream Classes: Contrasting L2 Learning Environments. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 241-272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3587433
Haskell, R. E. (2001). Transfer of learning: Cognition, instruction, and reasoning. Academic Press.
Holton, E. F. III. (2005). Holton’s evaluation model: New evidence and construct elaborations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7, 37–54.
Holton III, Bates, R. A., Seyler, D. L., & Carvalho, M. B. (1997). Toward construct validation of a transfer climate instrument. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 8(2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920080203
Holton, E. F., III, Bates, R. A., & Ruona, W. E. A. (2000). Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11, 333–360.
Jackson. (2005). An inter-university, cross-disciplinary analysis of business education: Perceptions of business faculty in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.004
Jackson, Meyer, W., & Parkinson, J. (2006). A study of the writing tasks and reading assigned to undergraduate science students at a South African University. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.003
James. (2010). Transfer climate and EAP education: Students’ perceptions of challenges to learning transfer. English for Specific Purposes, 29(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.09.002
Knight, Greenberger, S. W., & McNaughton, M. E. (2021). An interdisciplinary perspective: The value that instructors place on giving written feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418810127
Leki, I., & Carson, J. G. (1994). Students' Perceptions of EAP Writing Instruction and Writing Needs across the Disciplines. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587199
Leki, I. (2001). “A Narrow Thinking System”: Nonnative-English-Speaking Students in Group Projects Across the Curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 39-67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3587859
Leki, I. (2006). Negotiating socioacademic relations: English learners' reception by and reaction to college faculty. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 136-152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.03.003
Lim, D. H., & Johnson, S. D. (2002). Trainee perceptions of factors that influence learning transfer. International Journal of Training and Development, 6(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2419.00148
LoCastro, V. (1997). Politeness and pragmatic competence in foreign language education. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 239-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889700100304
Martin, H. (2010). Workplace climate and peer support as determinants of training transfer. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21, 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20038
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Miles, & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis : an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Moskovitz, & Kellogg, D. (2011). Inquiry-Based Writing in the Laboratory Course. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 332(6032), 919–920. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200353
Nelms, G., & Dively, R. L. (2007). Perceived roadblocks to transferring knowledge from first-year composition to writing-intensive major courses: A pilot study. Writing Program Administration, 31, 214-240.
Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of learning. International encyclopedia of education, 2, 6452-6457.
Perkins, D. N. & G., Salomon. (1994). Transfer of learning. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd edn.) (vol. 11). Oxford: Pergamon, 6452–6457.
Rouiller, & Goldstein, I. L. (1993). The relationship between organizational transfer climate and positive transfer of training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 4(4), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920040408
Stanley, & Lewandowski, H. J. (2018). Recommendations for the use of notebooks in upper-division physics lab courses. American Journal of Physics, 86(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5001933
Tesch, R. (2013). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software. Routledge.
Tracey, J. B., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Kavanagh, M. J. (1995). Applying trained skills on the job: The importance of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.2.239
Zhu, W. (2004). Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.004
