Fallacy as a Strategy of Argumentation in Political Debates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1408.12Keywords:
argument, debate, fallacy, relevance, rhetorical devicesAbstract
This study aims to study argumentation in political debates by figuring out the logical fallacies employed in the debates of Clinton and Trump, the presidential nominees of the 2016 elections, and Biden and Trump, the leading contenders in the 2020 United States presidential election. The study attempts to answer the questions: (1) What relevance fallacies are adopted in the debate between Trump and Clinton? (2) What rhetorical devices are used to influence the audience and gain voters besides fallacies in the debates selected? The study analyses two texts from two arguments using Damer's (2009) taxonomy of relevance fallacy and rhetorical devices based on Perrine’s (1969) model of communication and interpersonal rhetoric to answer the two research questions. The significance of the pragma-rhetorical study of political debates resides in the role of investigating the pragmatic and rhetorical structure of political debates selected to encourage critical thinking, promote informed decision-making, and build a more effective and substantive political conversation. The analysis revealed that unlike Hillary, Trump uses the wrong reason, conclusion, and genetic fallacy and appeals to irrelevant authority and common opinion. Biden uses rationalisation, appealing to outside authority, and using the wrong reason. In terms of rhetoric, Trump, Clinton, and Biden all employ overstatement rather than other rhetorical devices to boost the shortcomings of their competitors and show them as unreliable in leading America in crisis. Other devices are absent except ‘understatement’, which appears for once, referring to the government's weak response to the crisis of COVID-19.
References
Abbas, N. F. (2020). Pragmatics of overlapping talk in therapy sessions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(3), 1251-1263. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.803705
Abbas, N.F., Qasim, T. A. & Jasim, H., A. (2023). Request Constructions in Classical Arabic versus Modern Arabic: A Corpus-based Study. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 10(5), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1598
Al-Sieedy, G. J., & Al-Jilihawi, H, R. W. (2020). A pragmatic study of fallacy in George W. Bush’s political speeches. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt, 17(12), 1221-1235. Retrieved January 8, 2023, from https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/6751/6526
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
Damer, T. E. (2009). Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments (6th ed). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Denzin, N. K, & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publication, Inc.
Hidayat, D. N., Defianty, N., M., Zulkifli, U. K., & Sufyan, A. (2020). Logical fallacies in social media: A discourse analysis in political debate. 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), Pangkal, Indonesia, 1-5. https://doi: 10.1109/CITSM50537.2020.9268821
Johnson, R. H. (2000). Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Kennedy, X. J., and Gioia, D. (2007). Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing (10th ed.). Pearson Longman.
King, G., Keohane, R. O., Verba, S. (1994). We are designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Kennedy, G. A. (1994). A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. University of Cambridge Press.
Mahmood, K. S., & Ali, S. M. (2022). A Pragmatic Analysis of Fallacies in English Religious Argumentative Discourse. Al-Adab Journal, 3(141), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v3i141.3730
Mohammed, H. N. & Abbas, N. F. (2016). Impoliteness in Literary Discourse: A Pragmatic Study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(2), 77-82. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.2p.76
Neuman, W. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson.
Perrine, L. (1969). Sound and Sense: An Introduction to Poetry (3rd ed.). Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
Shu’e, W., & Yanqing, G. (2018). An Analysis on Discourse Markers in First 2016 U.S. Presidential Debate. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, (213), 453-457. https:// doi. 10.2991/ichssr-18.2018.85
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
Walton, D. N. (1987). Informal Fallacies. Towards a theory of argument criticisms. John Benjamins.
Zarefsky, D. (1993). Lincoln, Douglas, and slavery: In the crucible of public debate. University of Chicago Press.
