Neural Machine Translation of Arabic to English Legal Texts Using Trados Studio: Efficiency and Consistency From the Perspective of Saudi Translation Students’ Post-Editing Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1407.33Keywords:
Legal Arabic-English Translation Trados Studio, post-editing, Saudi Arabia female translation studentsAbstract
This article examines the efficiency and consistency of Trados Studio in Arabic-English legal translation by analyzing the post-editing practices of 15 female Saudi translation students. The legal texts used are moderately complex, laden with Saudi-specific legal terminology and Islamic rules, sourced from Adel Azzam Saqf Al-Hait's "The Reliable Guide to Legal Translation" (2012). The Trados Studio Machine Translation Post-Editing Questionnaire (TMTPEQ) was employed to gather users’ insights. The study utilizes mixed methods, combining qualitative content analysis of Trados Studio-translated texts and student post-editing tasks with descriptive quantitative analysis of the questionnaire. The results reveal the ongoing challenge of achieving precision and extra-linguistic significance in written texts, especially in legal translation, exacerbated by specialized terminology, cultural nuances, and complex syntax. They also underscore the significance of qualitative assessments in post-edited translations, emphasizing the multifaceted role of translators encompassing linguistic, cultural, and specialized content precision and functional and legal equivalence.
References
Alshaikh, N. (2022). Problems of translating legal contracts: Perspectives of Saudi translation students. J. Pol. & L., 15(2), 50-59.
Alshehri, B. A., & Alowedi, N. A. (2023). Saudi Translation agencies and translation centers: A study of post-editing practices. World Journal of English Language, 13(3), 118-118.
Altarabin, M. (2018). Translating English legal lexical features into Arabic: Challenges and possibilities. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies, 2(2), 199–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol2no2.14
Alwazna, R. Y. (2019). Translation and legal terminology: Techniques for coping with the untranslatability of legal terms between Arabic and English. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 32(1), 75-94.
Daems, J., Vandepitte, S., Hartsuiker, R., & Macken, L. (2017). Identifying the machine translation error types with the greatest impact on post-editing effort. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01282
El Ghazi, O., & Bnini, C. (2019). Major translation methods used in legal documents: Translation of a marriage contract from Arabic into English. AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, 3(2), 122-138. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol3no2.11
El-Farahaty, H. (2015). Arabic-English-Arabic Legal Translation. Routledge.
El-Farahaty, H. (2016). Translating Lexical Legal Terms Between English and Arabic. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 29(2), 473–493.
Emara, N. Y. (2023). Using machine translation error identification to improve translation students’ post-editing skills. Transcultural Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 345-375. https://doi.org/10.21608/tjhss.2023.289357
Flanagan, M., & Christensen, T. P. (2014). Testing post-editing guidelines: How translation trainees interpret them and how to tailor them for translator training purposes. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 8(2), 257-275.
Gibbons, J. (1999). Language and the law. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 156-173. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190599190081
Glogar, O. (2023). The concept of legal language: What makes legal language ‘legal ‘? Int J Semiot Law, 36, 1081–1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10010-5
Hadj Aissa, A. (2021). Major problems in translating Algerian marriage and divorce documents into English. Maalim journal, 14(1), 1-42.
Herbig, N., Düwel, T., Pal, S., Meladaki, K., Monshizadeh, M., Krüger, A., & Van Genabith, J. (2020). MMPE: A multi-modal interface for post-editing machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics; 5—10 July; Online.
Hoballah, S. (2022). A diglossia multi-dialectal language in the courtroom: The challenges for English-Arabic legal interpreters [PhD thesis]. University of Western Sydney.
Hu, K. How MT errors correlate with post-editing effort: A new ranking of error types, Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies, 7(3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/23306343.2020.1809763
Idri, N., & Benmokhtari, H. (2016). Les enjeux de la Didactique de la Traduction au sein de l’Université algérienne: « hier, aujourd’hui et demain » [The challenges of Translation Didactics within the Algerian University: "yesterday, today, and tomorrow"]. Cahiers de Linguistique et Didactique, 6, 80-91. Retrieved from https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/149836
Khasawneh, Y. J. A., & Khasawneh, M. S. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence in improving machine translation post-editing; insights from translation editors. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 34, 7123-7146. https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v34i.2940
Kandeel, R. (2022). Les stratégies de la post-édition en traduction automatique des proverbes par des apprenants FLE et de traduction. Texto Livre, 14, (3 e29459), 2022, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.29459
Loney, N. (2023). Continuing our commitment to translate everything with the Trados Studio 2022 service release (SR1). Available from: https://www.trados.com/blog/commitment-to-translate-everything-with-sr1-studio-2022/?take=3 retrieved on 26-12-2023
Moisieieva, N., & Savostina, D. (2020). Lexical difficulties of translation of legal terminology. Molodij Včenij, Young Scientist, 10(86). https://doi.org/10.32839/2304-5809/2020-10-86-97
Pan, Y, & De La Puente, M. (2005). Census bureau guideline for the translation of data collection instruments and supporting materials: Documentation on how the guideline was developed. Survey Methodology, 6, 1-39.
Samman, H. M. (2022). Evaluating machine translation post-editing training in undergraduate translation programs: An exploratory study in Saudi Arabia [PhD thesis]. University of Southampton.
Saqf Al-Hait, A. A. (2012). The Reliable Guide to Legal Translation. The House of Culture for Publishing and Distribution.
Shterionov, D., Do Carmo, F., Moorkens, J., Hossari, M., Wagner, J., Paquin, E., Schmidtke, D., Groves, D., & Way, A. (2020). A roadmap to neural automatic post-editing: An empirical approach. Machine Translation, 34(2–3), 67–96.
Škop, M., Smejkalová, M., Malaník, M., Štěpáníková, T., & Vacková, B. (2019). Tvorba práva-empirické studie. Masarykova univerzita. [The Creation of Law - Empirical Studies].
Soavi, M., Zeni, N., Mylopoulos, J., & Mich, L. (2022). From legal contracts to formal specifications: A systematic literature review. SN Computer Science, 3(5), 345-351.
Tang, G. (2021). Translation of the proper nouns in legal English. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(6), 711–716.
Tatsumi, M. (2010). Post-editing machine translated text in a commercial setting: Observation and statistical analysis [PhD thesis]. Dublin City University.
Trados Studio. Trados Studio- Next-generation Translation Productivity. (2023). https://www.trados.com/product/studio/. Retrieved on 15-11-2023.
Yu, A. (2023). Quality evaluation of c-e translation of legal texts by mainstream machine translation systems—an example of DeepL and Metasota. English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies, 5(2), 180–180.
Zou, W., Huang, S., Xie, J., Dai, X., & Chen, J. (2020). A reinforced generation of adversarial examples for neural machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics; 5—10 July; Online.
Zemni, B., Bouhadiba, F., & Zitouni, M. (2022). Cognitive research and automatic translation in jurilinguistics. Texto Livre, 15, e27031.
