A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Ideological Identity Endorsed on the University's Homepages

Authors

  • Pirman Ginting Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Sri M. Murni Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Anni H. Pulungan Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1407.29

Keywords:

ideology, semiotic resources, multimodality, textual and visual components, university homepage

Abstract

Whilst a plethora of research has taken into account the exertion of website homepages as a conduit for effectively conveying information, it is acknowledged that the matter of ideological values and how these ideals are manifested through such digital communication media has been somewhat overlooked. Thus, the research at hand attempts to go over how the university advertises its ideological construal on its homepages by way of the adoption of multiple modes, involving both linguistic and aesthetic dimensions, and video. In this investigation, multimodal approaches encapsulated by Kress (2010) and Pauwels (2012) were employed to address the ideological values through visual components on the university homepages. Drawing from the attainable data, the university's homepage is crafted utilizing two fundamental categories of semiotic methods such as a combination of visual and textual elements, as well as video to reinforce the aesthetic, nevertheless, it neglects to incorporate any semiotic resource that places particular emphasis on visual components. The strategic utilization of diverse multiple modalities of communication on the homepage has effectively promoted an array of constructive ideological ideals that hold significant worth for stakeholders and the public, considering the pivotal role that universities play in shaping societal beliefs and perspectives.

Author Biographies

Pirman Ginting, Universitas Negeri Medan

Doctoral Program of English Applied Linguistics

Sri M. Murni, Universitas Negeri Medan

Doctoral Program of English Applied Linguistics

Anni H. Pulungan, Universitas Negeri Medan

Doctoral Program of English Applied Linguistics

References

Adami, E. (2015). Aesthetics in digital texts beyond writing: A social semiotic multimodal framework. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.) & A. Archer & E. Breuer (Vol. Eds.), Studies in writing, 30, Multimodality in writing, 43–62. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004297197_004.

Adami, E. (2018). Styling the self online: Semiotic technologization in weblog publishing. Social Semiotics, 28(5), 601–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1504713

Allam, R. A. B. (2017). Analyzing textual and visual portrayal of Muslims after 9/11 through images of the covers of Western Print Media: A multimodal functional approach. CDELT Occasional Papers in the Development of English Language Education, 63(2), 99–136. https://doi.org/10.21608/opde.2017.88023

Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307313177

Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687537

Bouvier, G. (2017). Clothing and meaning making: A multimodal approach to women’s abayas. Visual Communication, 17(2), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357217742340

Clark, B. (2007). Blazing a trail: moving from natural to linguistic meaning in accounting for the tones of English. In Randi, A., Amfo, A., & Borthen, K. (eds.) Interpreting utterances: Pragmatics and its interfaces. Essays in honour of thorstein fretheim, 69-81. Novus Press.

Elmiana, D. S. (2019). Pedagogical representation of visual images in EFL textbooks: a multimodal perspective. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 27(4), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2019.1569550

Flewitt, R., Price, S., & Korkiakangas, T. (2018). Multimodality: methodological explorations. Qualitative Research, 19(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118817414

Flick, U. (2013). The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis: Mapping the field. Sage.

Günay, M. (2021). Design in visual communication. Art and Design Review, 09(02), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2021.92010

Hall, R. H., & Hanna, P. (2004). The impact of web page text-background colour combinations on readability, retention, aesthetics and behavioural intention. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290410001669932

Haneef, M. S. M. (2018). Multimodal social semiotic analysis of Delhi rape conviction news in 2013 in CNN IBN website. Asian Journal of Communication, 29(1), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2018.1511739

Jaipal, K. (2010). Meaning making through multiple modalities in a biology classroom: A multimodal semiotics discourse analysis. Science Education, 94(1), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20359

Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07310586

Jewitt, C., Adami, E., Archer, A., Björkvall, A., & Lim, F. V. (2021). Editorial. Multimodality & Society, 1(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2634979521992902

Jewitt, C. & Henriksen, B. (2016). Social semiotic multimodality. In N. Klug & H. Stöckl (eds.), Handbuch Sprache im Multimodalen Kontext (pp. 145-164). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110296099-007

José-Santiago & Fernández-Vázquez. (2020). Analysing the environmental websites of the world’s greatest polluters: A multimodal ecolinguistic approach. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 2692-2711. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1836993

Keane, W. (2003). Semiotics and the social analysis of material things, 23(3-4), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0271-5309(03)00010-7

Khafaga, A. (2022). Semiotic Staging of the ideological point of view in Amiri Baraka’s Slave Ship: A social-semiotic approach. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 9(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2133484

Kilby, L., & Lennon, H. (2021b). When words are not enough: Combined textual and visual multimodal analysis as a critical discursive psychology undertaking. Methods in Psychology, 5, 100071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100071

Knox, J. S. (2013). Multimodality and systemic functional analysis. In Chapelle, C. A. (Ed.), 1 – 7. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0836.pub2

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Kress, G. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In Gee, J. P., & Handford, M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis, pp. 35 – 50. Routledge.

Laba, N. (2020). Multimodal discourse of university websites: The social semiotic landscape. Doctoral Colloquium of #AoIR2020: The 21st Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers.

Ling, J., & van Schaik, P. (2002). The effect of text and background colour on visual search of web Pages. Displays, 23(5), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-9382(02)00041-0

Magnusson, P., & Godhe, A. (2019). Multimodality in language education – implications for teaching. Designs for Learning, 11(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.127

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.

McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001

Mora, R. A., & Golovátina‐Mora, P. (2020). Video composition as multimodal writing: Rethinking the essay as post-literacy. KnE Social Sciences, 4-12. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i13.7690

Nasti, C., Venuti, M., & Zollo, S. A. (2017). UK university websites: A multimodal, corpus-based analysis. International Journal of Language Studies, 11(4), 131-152.

Nescolarde-Selva, J. A., & Usó-Doménech, J. L. (2014). Semiotic vision of ideologies. Foundations of Science, 19(3), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-013-9329-8

Noth, W. (2004). Semiotics of ideology. Semiotica, 148, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2004.002

O’Halloran, K., Pal, G., & Jin, M. (2021). Multimodal approach to analysing big social and news media data. Discourse, Context and Media, 40, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100467

O’Halloran, K., Tan, S., & Wignell, P. (2019). SFL and multimodal discourse analysis. In Thompson, G., Bowcher, W. L., Fontaine, L., & Schonthal, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 433–461. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337936.019

O’Halloran, K. L., Marissa K. L. E., Podlasov, A., & Tan, S. (2013). Multimodal digital semiotics: The interaction of language with other resources. Text & Talk, 33(4–5). https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0030

Palmer, C., & Bolderston, A. (2006). A Brief Introduction to qualitative research. The Canadian Journal of Medical Radiation Technology, 16-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0820-5930(09)60112-2

Patton, M. Q., & Cochran, M. (2002). A guide to using qualitative research methodology. Medecins Sans Frontieres.

Pauwels, L. (2012). A multimodal framework for analyzing websites as cultural expressions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01572.x

Suphaborwornrat, W., & Punkasirikul, P. (2022). A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis of Online Soft Drink Advertisements. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 627-653. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/index

Swan, E. (2017). Postfeminist stylistics, work femininities and coaching: a multimodal study of a website. Gender, Work & Organization, 24(3), 274 – 296. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12162

Tan, S., Kay O’Halloran, K., & Wignell, P. (2020). Multimodality. In De Fina, Anna, D. F., & Georgakopoulou, A. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of discourse studies (pp. 263 – 281). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348195.013

Turra, E. (2020). Culture, communication and persuasion on gastronomic tourism websites: a multimodal analysis. Journal of Visual Literacy, 39(3-4), 256-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2020.1828676

van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage Publications.

van Leeuwen, T. (2015). Multimodality. In Tannen, T., Hamilton, H. E., & Schiffrin, D. (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, pp. 447 – 465. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194

Verschueren, J. (2011). Language use and ideology. In Ideology in Language Use: Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research (Volume 1, pp. 7–20). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026277.003

Wagner, A., & Sherwin, R. K. (2014). Law, culture and visual studies. Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9322-6

Wodak, R. (2007). Language and ideology-language in ideology. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1075/156921507781509581

Wong, M. (2019). Multimodal communication: A social semiotic approach to text and image in print and digital media. Palgrave Macmillan.

Wu, O., Zuo, H., Hu, W., & Li, B. (2016). Multi-Modal web aesthetics assessment based on structural SVM and multi-task fusion learning. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 18(6), 1062–1076. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2016.2538722

Zhang, Y., & O'Halloran, K. L. (2013). Toward a global knowledge enterprise: university websites as portals to the ongoing marketization of higher education. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(4), 468-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.813777

Downloads

Published

2024-07-17

Issue

Section

Articles