Rhetorical Move-Step Analysis of Argumentative Essays by Chinese EFL Undergraduate Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1407.13Keywords:
rhetorical move-step analysis, argumentative writing, Chinese undergraduatesAbstract
Rhetorical move-step analysis, an analytical approach within discourse analysis, is commonly employed to scrutinize the rhetorical structures inherent in various community genre practices. This method has also been extensively applied in academic and professional writing, particularly in published research articles and doctoral dissertations. However, little research has investigated the rhetorical move-step structures evident in argumentative writing by Chinese undergraduate students. Therefore, this study explores the rhetorical move-step structure of argumentative essays in Chinese EFL contexts. A corpus comprising 30 argumentative essays authored by undergraduate students at a Chinese university was assembled for analysis. The move-step structure of the data was analyzed using Hyland’s (1990) analytical framework. The results indicated that most students utilized Hyland’s model in crafting their argumentative essays. Additionally, the findings revealed that the argumentative essays by Chinese undergraduates adhered to a structure consisting of five obligatory moves, three conventional moves, one optional move, and multiple obligatory, conventional, and optional steps beyond the established analytical framework. These findings’ implications extend to pedagogical practices and further research in the domain of EFL students’ academic writing.
References
Ädel, A. (2023). Adopting a move rather than a marker approach to metadiscourse: A taxonomy for spoken student presentations. English for Specific Purposes, 69, 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.09.001
Alharbi, N. (2023). A rhetorical structural analysis of introductions in L2 Saudi students’ argumentative essays. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(4), 94. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0093
Alyousef, H. S. (2021). Structure of research article abstracts in political science: A genre-based study. SAGE Open, 11(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040797
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in Dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004
Bhatia, V. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A. (2007). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. John Benjamins.
Chang, T. (2023). A move analysis of Chinese L2 student essays from the sociocognitive perspective: Genres, languages, and writing quality. Assessing Writing, 57, 100750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100750
Cheng, A. (2015). Genre analysis as a pre-instructional, instructional, and teacher development framework. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.04.004
Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2017). A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating rigor and credibility. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001
Dong, J., & Lu, X. (2020). Promoting discipline-specific genre competence with corpus-based genre analysis activities. English for Specific Purposes, 58, 138–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.01.005
Friginal, E. & S. S. Mustafa. (2017). A comparison of U.S.-based and Iraqi English research article abstracts using corpora. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 25, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.11.004
Hu, G. & Liu, Y. (2018). Three minute thesis presentations: A cross-disciplinary study of genre moves. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 35, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.06.004
Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829002100105
Hyland, K. (2004). Graduates’ gratitude: The generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00051-6
Kanestion, A., & Sarjit, M. K. S. (2021). A corpus-based investigation of moves in the argument stage of argumentative essays. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 7(9), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra8475
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007). Rhetorical moves in biochemistry research articles. In D. Biber, U. Connor, & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure (pp. 73-120). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.28.06kan
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 74–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.008
Kessler, M. (2020). A text analysis and gatekeepers’ perspectives of a promotional genre: Understanding the rhetoric of Fulbright grant statements. English for Specific Purposes, 60, 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.07.003
Kessler, M. & Polio, C. (2023). Conducting genre-based research in applied linguistics: A methodological guide. Routledge.
Khany, R., & Malmir, B. (2020). A move-marker list: A study of rhetorical move-lexis linguistic realizations of research article abstracts in social and behavioral sciences. RELC Journal, 51(3), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219833131
Lim, J. M. (2006). Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 282–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.07.001
Liu, D. (2015). Moves and wrap-up sentences in Chinese students’ essay conclusions. SAGE Open, 5(2), 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244015592681
Loi, C. K. (2010). Research article’s introductions in Chinese and English: A comparative genre-based study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(4), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.09.004
Neupane Bastola, M., & Ho, V. (2023). Rhetorical structure of literature review chapters in Nepalese PhD dissertations: Students’ engagement with previous scholarship. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 65, 101271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101271
Parkinson, J. (2017). The student laboratory report genre: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 45, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.03.006
Park, S., Jeon, J., & Shim, E. (2021). Exploring request emails in English for business purposes: A move analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.03.006
Rau, G., & Shih, Y. (2021). Evaluation of Cohen’s kappa and other measures of inter-rater agreement for genre analysis and other nominal data. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 53, 101026. https://doi.org/10.1016.j.jeap.2021.101026
Schneer, D. (2014). Rethinking the argumentative essay. TESOL Journal, 5, 619–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.123
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Tardy, C. M., Caplan, N. A., & Johns. A. M. (2023). Genre explained: Frequently asked questions and answers about genre-based instruction. University of Michigan Press.
Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
Van Herck, R. Decock, S., & Fastrich, B. (2022). A unique blend of interpersonal and transactional strategies in English email responses to customer complaints in a B2C setting: A move analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 65, 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.08.001
Wang, Y. (2023). Demystifying academic promotional genre: A rhetorical move-step analysis of Teaching Philosophy Statements (TPSs). Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 65, 101284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101284
Wingate, U. (2012), ‘Argument!’ Helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001
Wood, N. V. (2001). Perspectives on argument. Prentice Hall.
Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1
Ye, Y. (2019). Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in energy engineering research articles written by Chinese expert writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.007
Zhang, Y., & Cui, J. (2023). The relationship between syntactic complexity and rhetorical stages in L2 learners’ texts: A comparative analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 72, 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.08.003
