Exploring the Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity and L2 Oral Fluency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1407.06Keywords:
working memory capacity, episodic buffer, chunk capacity, chunk size, L2 oral fluencyAbstract
This study investigated the relationship between working memory capacity (WMC) and L2 oral fluency and explored the maintenance of newly presented information in L2 speaking production. When performing speech production tasks, knowledge from long-term memory is at frequent use and hence involves the operation of the episodic buffer, one component of the working memory system, where information is retrieved from long-term memory and stored in chunks as we speak in chunks. In this study, we measured WMC by assessing chunk capacity and chunk size held in and retrieved from the episodic buffer. Chunk capacity was measured by Pair-word Speaking Task; chunk size was measured by Procedure Description Task; and oral fluency was measured by speech rate and mean length of run using an IELTS speaking task. Twenty-nine English-major students participated in this study. The results showed a strong positive correlation between chunk capacity and the two measures of fluency while chunk size negatively correlated with fluency. Data from the recall interviews revealed that participants employed various strategies for the maintenance of the presented information which involved different types of information binding.
References
Ahmadian, M. J. (2012). The relationship between working memory capacity and L2 oral performance under task‐based careful online planning condition. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 165-175.
Aslan, R., & Şahin, M. (2020). ‘I feel like I go blank’: Identifying the factors affecting classroom participation in an oral communication course. TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 31(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v31i1/19-43
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1971). The control of short-term memory. Scientific American, 225(2), 82-91.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York, NY: Academic press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory: The interface between memory and cognition. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 4(3), 281-288.
Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(11), 417-423.
Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J., & Allen, R. J. (2009). Working memory and binding in sentence recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 438-456.
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual review of psychology, 63, 1-29.
Bergsleithner, J. M. (2011). The role of noticing and working memory capacity in L2 oral performance. Organon, 26(51). https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-8915.28841
Brown, D. F. (1974). Advanced vocabulary teaching: The problem of collocation. RELC Journal, 5(2), 1-11.
Bui, G., & Huang, Z. (2016). L2 fluency as influenced by content familiarity and planning: Performance, measurement, and pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 94-114.
Chin, S. L., & Kersten, A.W. (2010). The application of the less is more hypothesis in foreign language learning. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 150-155). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Conway, A. R. A. & Engle, R.W. (1996). Individual differences in working memory capacity: More evidence for a general capacity theory. Memory, 4, 577-590.
Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62-101). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1-18.
Daneman, M., & Tardif, T. (1987). Working memory and reading skill re-examined. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 491-508). London: Erlbaum.
Daneman, M. (1991). Working memory as a predictor of verbal fluency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 445-464.
Engle, R. W., Kane, M.J., & Tuholski, S.W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In: A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102-134). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Finardi, K. (2008). Working memory capacity and L2 speech production in a picture description task with repetition. Revista de Estudos Da Linguagem, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.16.2.129-144
Finardi, K., & Prebianca, G. V. V. (2006). Working memory capacity and speech production in L2: evidence from a picture description task. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 14(1), 231- 260.
Fortkamp, M. B. M. (1999). Working memory capacity and aspects of L2 speech production. Communication & Cognition, 32, 259-296.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105.
Jones G. (2012). Why Chunking Should be Considered as an Explanation for Developmental Change before Short-Term Memory Capacity and Processing Speed. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00167
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P.A., & Keller, T.A. (1996). The capacity theory of comprehension: New frontiers of evidence and arguments. Psychological Review, 103(4), 773-780.
Kapikian, A., & Briscoe, J. (2012). Semantic binding, not attentional control, generates coherent global structure in children's narrative memory. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 751-764.
Kersten, A. W., & Earles, J. L. (2001). Less really is more for adults learning a miniature artificial language. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 250-273.
Lennon, F. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40, 387-417.
Mahdavi-Zafarghandi, A., Tahriri, A., & Bandari, M.D. (2015). The impact of teaching chunks on speaking fluency of Iranian EFL learners. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(4), 36-47.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus-or-minus two: Some limits of our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
Mizera, G. J. (2006). Working memory and L2 oral fluency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. Retrieved December 05, 2023, from http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/7655/1/Mizera.Dissertation.pdf
Mota, M. B. (2003). Working memory capacity and fluency, accuracy, complexity, and lexical density in L2 speech production. Fragmentos: Revista de Língua e Literatura Estrangeiras, 24, 69-104.
Mostafa, T., Kim, Y., & Friginal, E. (2020). Examining a developmentally based measure of L2 oral performances: Does it predict L2 learners’ oral proficiency? System, 89, 102197. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2019.102197
Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11–28.
Ngoc, D. T. B., & Dung, T. T. (2020). Key factors influencing learners’ oral fluency in English speaking classes: a case at a public university in Viet Nam. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 36(6), 93. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4631
Pawley, A., & Syder, H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection and native-like fluency. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191-226). London: Longman.
Prebianca, G. V. V., Finardi, K. R., & Weissheimer, J. (2014). Working memory capacity across L2 speech proficiency levels. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 14(2), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-63982014005000009
Rezai, M. J., & Okhovat, B. (2016). The Effect of Working Memory on EFL Learners’ Oral Fluency. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(5), 74. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n5p74
Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357-385.
Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York, NY: Routledge.
Shen, L. (2015). Impacts of chunks input on Chinese English major students’ oral production. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(10), 2138-2143.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Smalle, E. H. M., Bogaerts, L., Simonis, M., Duyck, W., Page, M. P. A., Edwards, M. G., & Szmalec, A. (2016). Can chunk size differences explain developmental changes in lexical learning? Frontiers in Psychology, 6(JAN), [1925]. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01925
Taguchi, N. (2008). Building language blocks in L2 Japanese: Chunk learning and the development of complexity and fluency in spoken production. Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 132-156.
Tavares, M. D. G. G. (2016). Learners' processes during pre-task planning and working memory capacity. Ilha do Desterro, 69(1), 79-94.
Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17, 84-119.
Vieira, G. V. (2017). Lexical Access in L2 Speech Production: a controlled serial search task. Ilha Do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, 70(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2017v70n3p245
Weissheimer, J., & Mota, M. B. (2009). Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and the Development of L2 Speech Production. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.5070/L4172005115
