Building Topics in Guiziga: A Cartographic Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1103.01Keywords:
topicalization, upward movement, left periphery, multiple topics, revelationAbstract
This article attempts to provide a description of topic constructions in the Guiziga language within the cartographic framework. Data for this work were collected using both the primary and secondary source. The analyses reveal that this language does not select topicalizers as it is the case in other Chadic languages (Bebey 2015 and 2018). It also demonstrates that the topicalized constituents undergo an upward movement to land in the Spec,Top, while it leaves an empty trace in the original position. The language tolerates multiple Topic Phrases (TopP) in the sentence left periphery. Also, it is demonstrated that the subject –NP involves the apparition of the presumptive pronoun given the prominence of the latter. At the semantic level, the article indicates that topics in Guiziga are revelations about old information, rather than simple old information.
References
Aboh, E. O. (2004). The Morphosyntax of Complement-Head Sequences. New York: New York University Press.
Bebey, Théodore. (2010). Le mouvement des syntagmes qu en muyang. Mémoire de Master. Université de Yaoundé I.
Bebey, Théodore. (2015). The Cartographic Syntax of Muyang: a Chadic Language Spoken in Northern Cameroon. Ph.D dissertation, University of Yaounde I.
Bebey, Théodore. (2018). “The Split Topic Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence in Chadics.” In National Symposium on Cameroonian Languages. Yaounde: SIL International
Belletti, Adriana. (1990). Generalized Verb Movement. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.
Biloa, Edmond. (2013). The Syntax of Tuki: A Cartographic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cecchetto, C. (2004). “Remnant Movement in the Theory of Phases.” In L. Rizzi (ed) The Structure of CP and IP. The cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 2. pp. 166-189. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1993). A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2004). “Beyond Explanatory Adequacy” in Structures and beyond: the Cartography of the syntactic structures Volume 3, ed., Adriana Belletti, 104-131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Durrleman-Tame, Stephanie. (2008). The Syntax of Jamaican Creole: A Cartographic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Grimes, F.B. ( 2000) (ed). Ethnologue. Languages of the world 14th edition Sil International, Dallas, Texas.
Gundel, J., k. (1983). The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. New York: Gerland
Haegeman, Liliane. (2000). “Negative Preposing, the Neg Criterion and the Structure of CP” in Negation and Polarity, ed. Laurence Horn and Yasuhiko Kato, 29-69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kataline E. (1981). “Topic and focus, the operators of the Hungarian Sentence”. Folia Linguistica, XV, pp 305-330.
Kayne, Richard. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT press.
Nkemnji, M. (1995). Heavy Pied-Piping in Nweh. Ph.D Dissertation, UCLA.
Pollock, Jean-Yves. (1989). “Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP.” In Linguistic Inquiry 20. 365-424.
Radford, Andrew. (1997). Syntax: A minimalist Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. (1997). “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluver, 281-337.
Rizzi, Luigi. (2001b). “On the position In‘terrogative’ in the left periphery of the clause”. In G. Cinque and G. Savi (eds) Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 287-296.
Rizzi, Luigi. (2004b). “Locality and Left Periphery” in Structures and Beyond, ed. Adriana Belletti, 223-251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. (2013). “Notes on Cartography and Further Explanation”. In Probus. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 197-226.
Wermers, W. E. (1973). African Languages Structures. Bekerley: University of California.
