The Dimensions of Language and Thought in the Vedic Literature

Authors

  • Sabindra Raj Bhandari Tribhuvan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1102.04

Keywords:

dissect, language, mantra, Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, thought, vedic literature

Abstract

The present article explores the interrelationships between language and thought in the literature of the Vedic Canon. Whether language shapes thoughts or vice versa has remained a topic pregnant with perpetual discussions, interpretations, and explanations since the beginning of human civilization. Throughout the multiple crossroads of the development in the intellectual tradition, the dimensions of language and thought attracted many scholars and linguists. However, linguists like Edward Sapir and Benjamin L. Whorf in the twentieth century have systematically interpreted and analyzed the language-thought dimensions. Whorf postulated that language shapes thoughts while Sapir projected that language is in the grip of thought. The literature of the Vedic Canon has also logically and systematically projected the multiple dimensional, but agglutinative relationships between language and thought. The hymns of the Rig Veda, myths from Brahmanas, and the lore from Upanishads unravel, interpret, and enrich the language-thought interconnection in such a way that the Vedic literature remains as the classical version of Sapir-Whorf hypothesis written in Sanskrit. In this regard, the Vedic literature and Sapir-Whorf hypothesis play the same tune of music in different lyres. The present paper attempts to reveal this point of unity in diversity between the two seemingly diverse schools of thoughts—classical Vedic literature and modern linguistic theory of Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. Being the qualitative research, this paper explores, interprets, and correlates the theoretical concepts, ideas, and phenomena from the Vedic literature and Sapir-Whorf hypothesis.

References

Chase, S. (1956). Foreword. In B. L. Whorf, Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge: The MIT Press, v-x. Website: https:www.pdfdrive.com(Acessed 12 September 2020).

Cresswell, J. W. (2011). Research design, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Deussen, P. (2010). Sixty upanisads of the vedas (V.W. Bedekar and G.B. Palsule, trans.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. 2 vols.

Frawley, D. (1992). Wisdom of the ancient seers: Mantras of the rig veda. Salt Lake City: Passage Press. Website: https:www.pdfdrive.com (Accessed 18 September 2020).

Gentner, D. & Meadow, S. G. (eds.). (2003). Language in mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Website: https:www.pdfdrive.com. (Accessed 12 September 2020).

Goldberg, P. (2010). American veda. New York: Three Rivers Press.

Griffith, R. T. H. (trans.). (2001). The rig veda. Website: https:www.pdfdrive.com (Accessed 16 September 2020)

Hamilton, S. (2007). Indian philosophy: A very short introduction. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Hiriyanna, M. (2000). Outlines of Indian philosophy. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

International Bible Society (1984). The holy bible: New version containing the old testament and the new testament. Bangkok: International Bible Society.

Macdonnel, A. A., Oldenberg, H, & Muller, M. (trans.). (2014). The golden book of the holy veda. Delhi: Vijay Goel.

Muller, M. (trans.). (2000). The thirteen principal upanishads. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Classics.

Munnich, E. & Landau, B. (2003). The effects of spatial language on spatial representation: Setting some boundaries. In D. Gentner. D. & S. G. Meadow (eds.), Language in mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 113-156. Website: https:www.pdfdrive.com (Accessed 12 September 2020).

Panikkar, R. (ed. & trans). (1994). The vedic experience mantramanjari. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Radhakrishnan. S. (ed., & trans). (2016). The principal upanisads. London: Harper Collins Publishers.

Seuren, P. A. M. (2013). From Whorf to Montague: Exploration in the theory of language. Oxford: oxford University Press. Website: https:www.pdfdrive.com (Accessed 16 September 2020).

Tomasello, M. (2003). The key is social cognition. In D. Gentner & S. G. Meadow (eds.), Language in mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 47-58. Website: https:www.pdfdrive.com (Accessed 12 September 2020).

Traugott, E. C, & Pratt, M. L. (1980). Linguistics for students of literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Whorf. B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality (J. B. Carroll, ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press. Website: https:www.pdfdrive.com (Accessed 12 September 2020).

Zaehner, R. C. (ed., & trans.). (1982). The hindu scriptures. London: J. M Dent and Sons Ltd.

Zimmer, H. (2011). Philosophies of India (J. Campbell, trans.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-01

Issue

Section

Articles