An Analysis of the Engagement System of Vietnamese Research Articles in the Light of the Appraisal Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1405.33Keywords:
evaluative language, appraisal framework, engagement, contract, expandAbstract
Evaluation is widely accepted by many scientists as one of the most basic and important functions of language worth studying deeply. As a result, evaluative language has drawn a lot of interests worldwide. Yet, the Vietnamese language community appears to be rather unfamiliar with this term. In order to shed further light on the use of evaluative language in Vietnam, this article examines how evaluative language is exploited by Vietnamese linguists in a corpus of 35 Vietnamese empirical research articles in the light of the Appraisal framework by Martin and White (2005). More specifically, the study analyses the frequency of categories of the Engagement system in the Appraisal framework and studies in-depth realizations of the Contract sub-system. Results show that Contract resources are more frequently employed than Expand. Writers tend to contract their dialogues more in the Conclusion section of the articles. It is hoped that the research results will be a useful reference for article writers and they can contribute to the literature materials for the fields of evaluative language and academic writing pedagogy in Vietnam.
References
Bang, M.-H., & S-I Shin. (2012). A corpus-based Study of Green Discourse in the South Korean Press in Comparison with the US Press. Sociolinguistics, 20(1), 79-110.
Brooke, M. (2014). Attribution and Authorial (Dis) Endorsement in High- and low-rated Undergraduate ESL Students’ English Academic Persuasive Essays. English linguistics research, 3(1), 1-11.
Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.
Fazilatfar, A. M., & Naseri, Z. S. (2016). The Study of Rhetorical Moves in Applied Linguistics Research-based Articles Written by Iranian Researchers. International journal of linguistics, 8(6), 154-173.
Geng, Y., & Wharton, S. (2016). Evaluative Language in Discussion Sections of Doctoral Theses: Similarities and Differences between L1 Chinese and L1 English Writers. Journal of English for academic purposes, 22, 80-91.
Helander, R. (2014). Appraisal in Political Speech: A Comparative Study of Winston Churchill and Tony Blair. Bachelor’s degree essay. Lund University.
Hu, G., & Choo, L. (2015). The impact of disciplinary background and teaching experience on the use of evaluative language in teacher feedback. Teachers and teaching: Theory and Practice, 22(3), 329-349.
Hunston, S. (1994). Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In M. Coulthard (Ed.). Advances in written text analysis (191-218). London: Routledge.
Hunston, S., & Sinclair, J. (2000). A local grammar of evaluation. In Hunston, S., & G. Thompson (Eds.). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (75-100). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Evaluative that constructions: signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions of language, 12, 39–63.
Kochetova, L. A., & Volodchenkova, O. I. (2015). Evaluative language in English job advertisements in diachronic perspective. Review of European studies, 7(11), 292-302.
Kong, K. C. C. (2006). Linguistic resources as evaluators in English and Chinese research articles. Multilingual – Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 25(1-2), 183-216.
Liu, X. (2010). An Application of Appraisal Theory to Teaching College English Reading in China. Journal of language teaching and research, 1(2), 133-135.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London/ New York: Palgrave/ Macmillan.
Mazlum, F., & Afshin, S. (2016). Evaluative language in political speeches: A case study of Iranian and American presidents’ speeches. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(4), 166-183.
Myskow, G. (2017). Surveying the historical landscape: The evaluative choice of history textbooks. Functional linguistics, 4(7), 1-15.
Ngo, T. (2013). The deployment of the language of evaluation in English and Vietnamese spoken discourse. Thesis of Doctor of Philosophy. University of New England.
Pho, P. D. (2008). How Can Learning about the Structure of Research Articles Help International Student? Paper presented at The 19th international ISANA international education conference, Auckland, New Zealand.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.
Taboada, M., & Carretero, M. (2010). Labelling evaluative language in English and Spanish: The case of Attitude in consumer reviews. Paper presented at the 6th international contrastive linguistics conference. Berlin, September 30-October 2, 2010.
Yang, R. & Allison, D. (2004). Research Articles in Applied Linguistics: Structures from a Functional Perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 264-279.
