Segmental Phonemes Conservation in Pattae Language, Indonesia

Authors

  • Jerniati I. National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Herianah National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Ratnawati National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Andi Indah Yulianti National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Musayyedah National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Syamsurijal National Research and Innovation Agency

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1405.28

Keywords:

segmental phoneme, Pattae language, language conservation

Abstract

This study focused on conserving the speech sound system of the Pattae language. It employed speaking and listening methods. The result indicates that the vowel sounds are ten, the consonant sounds are eighteen, and the diphthongs are [aw] and [ay]. The classifications of vowel sound characters are six phonemes, they are /a/, /i/, /u/, /e/, //, and /o/, and long vowel phonemes are /a:/, /i:/, /u:/, and /o:/. The long vowel phonemes are insufficient supporting data. These vowels can be distributed in a word's initial, middle, and final positions, except /e/, which is not indicated in the initial position. Besides, the classification of consonant sound characters shows eighteen phonemes, including /p/, /b/, /t/, /d/, /m/, /ñ/, /n/, //, /k/, /g/, /l/, /r/, /s/, /j/, /c/, /?/, /y/, and /w/. Three consonants are distributed in all positions, including n/, //, and /k/; four are distributed in the final, namely /n/, //, /k/, and /?/; twelve are distributed in the initial and middle, such as /p/, /b/, /t/, /d/, /m/,/ñ/, /k/, /g/, /l/, /r/, /s/, and /w/; and two are distributed in the middle, involving /y/ and /j/.

Author Biographies

Jerniati I., National Research and Innovation Agency

Research Center for Language and Literature Preservation

Herianah, National Research and Innovation Agency

Research Center for Language, Literature, and Community

Ratnawati, National Research and Innovation Agency

Research Center for Language, Literature, and Community

Andi Indah Yulianti, National Research and Innovation Agency

Research Center for Language and Literature Preservation

Musayyedah, National Research and Innovation Agency

Research Center for Language and Literature Preservation

Syamsurijal, National Research and Innovation Agency

Research Center for Language and Literature Preservation

References

Abercrombie, D. (1990). Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474463775

Alfianika, N. (2018). Metode Penelitian Pengajaran Bahasa Indonesia. In CV. Budi Utama.

Aritonang, B. (2016). Kriteria Vitalitas Bahasa Talondo. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 5(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v5i1.34

Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. (2016). KBBI VI Daring. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/konservasi

Ba’dulu, A. M., & Herman. (2010). Morfosintaksis. In PT. Rineka Cipta. PT Rineka Cipta.

Basir, N., Hashim, A. F. M., Abdullah, S., Rahim, N. A. A., Sabri, M., Yusuf, A. H., Harun, W. N., & Buragohain, D. (2018). “Talking Phonics for Autism”: Developing a Multi-purpose Touch Screen Technology Software Application Which Utilizes Sound Articulation Point to Teach Autistic Children. MATEC Web of Conferences, 150, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005040

Bocale, P. (2019). Language Shift and Language Revival in Crimea. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2019(260), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2019-2049

Bowern, C. (2017). Language Vitality: Theorizing Language Loss, Shift, and Reclamation (Response to Mufwene). Language, 93(4), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0068

Brown, G. D. A. (1997). Connectionism, Phonology, Reading, and Regularity in Developmental Dyslexia. Brain and Language, 59(2), 207–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1817

Cerna, M. C. S. Dela. (2017). Segmental Phonemes of the Surigawnun Language. Proceedings of 85th IASTEM International Conference, Manila, Philippines, 7–12.

Friberg, T. (1987). Unhas-SIL South Sulawesi Sociolinguistic Surveys.

Grimes, B. F. (1992). Ethnologue: Languages of the World (12th ed.). SIL.

Harimansyah, G., Rivai, O. S., Setiawan, D., Solihah, A., Aritonang, B., Susamto, D. A., & Cesarai, D. L. (2017). Pedoman Konservasi dan Revitalisasi Bahasa (Mustakim & W. Prihartono, Eds.; 1st ed.). Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa.

Harimurti, K. (2013). Kamus Linguistik. In Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama (4th ed.). PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Ibrahim, G. A. (2011). Bahasa terancam punah: Fakta, sebab-musabab, gejala, dan strategi perawatannya. Linguistik Indonesia, 29(1), 35–52.

I., J. (2015). Karakteristik Fonem Bahasa Panasuan di Sulawesi Barat. Sawerigading: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 28(1), 265–272.

Katamba, F. (1996). An Introduction to Phonology (8th ed.). Longman.

Kenstowich, M., & Kisseberth, C. (1977). Topics in Phonological Theory. Academic Press, Inc.

Kridalaksana, H. (2013). Kamus Linguistik. In Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama (4th ed.). PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Mahsun. (2014). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan, Strategi, dan Tekniknya. In Metode, dan tekniknya. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. Rajawali Press.

Masa, N. S., Mohd Rusli, N. F., & Md Adam, N. F. (2020). Perubahan Vokal Tinggi di Akhir Kata dalam Dialek Taiping dalam Kalangan Pelajar: Analisis Fonologi Generatif. Issues in Language Studies, 9(1), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.2352.2020

Maye, J., & Gerken, L. (2001). Learning Phonemes: How Far Can the Input Take Us? Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 480–491.

McDonald, R., & Gao, C. (2019). Pivoting isn’t enough? Managing strategic reorientation in new ventures. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1287

Muslich, M. (2008). Fonologi Bahasa Indonesia: Tinjauan Deskriptif Sistem Bunyi Bahasa Indonesia (1st ed.). Bumi Aksara.

Nagy, I. K. (2020). In between Language Teaching Methods: Do We Need (to Know About) Methods at All? Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 11(3), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2019-0030

Octaviana, D. R., & Ramadhani, R. A. (2021). Hakikat Manusia: Pengetahuan (Knowledge), Ilmu Pengetahuan (Sains), Filsafat Dan Agama. Jurnal Tawadhu, 5(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52802/twd.v5i2.227

Ong, T. W. S. (2021). Family Language Policy, Language Maintenance and Language Shift: Perspectives from Ethnic Chinese Single Mothers in Malaysia. Issues in Language Studies, 10(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.3075.2021

Peterson, D., Hanazaki, N., & Berkes, F. (2020). Do We All Speak the Same Language When Talking Conservation? Caicąra Understandings of Conservation in their Landscape. Conservation & Society, 18(3), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_18_123

Pike, K. L. (1947). Phonemics: A Technique for Reducing Languages to Writing. In PikePhonemics: a Technique for Reducing Languages to Writing1947. Michigan University Press.

Ratnawati, I., J., Herianah, & Syamsurijal. (2019). Vitalitas Bahasa Pattae.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge university press.

Schane, S. A. (1973). Generative Phonology. In Journal of Linguistics (4th ed., Issue 2). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700004643

Schultz, R., Abbott, T., Yamaguchi, J., & Cairney, S. (2019). Australian Indigenous Land Management, Ecological Knowledge and Languages for Conservation. EcoHealth, 16(1), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-018-1380-z

Singh, J., Singh, G., Singh, R., & Singh, P. (2021). Morphological Evaluation and Sentiment Analysis of Punjabi Text Using Deep Learning Classification. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 33(5), 508–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.04.003

Siregar, E. (2017, October 28). Separuh Bahasa Daerah akan Punah. Cek Fakta. https://www.liputan6.com/cek-fakta/read/3378930/cek-fakta-separuh-bahasa-daerah-akan-punah

Soo Ying, H., Swee Heng, C., & Nadzimah Abdullah, A. (2015). Language Vitality of Malaysian Languages and Its Relation to Identity. GEMA Online ® Journal of Language Studies, 15(2).

Sparrow, L., & Miellet, S. (2002). Activation of Phonological Codes During Reading: Evidence from Errors Detection and Eye Movements. Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2543

Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Duta Wacana University Press.

Suwarno, B. (2017). A Policy Proposal for Heritage Language Conservation: A Case for Indonesia and Sarawak. Issues in Language Studies, 6(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.1619.2017

Tseng, W. T., Cheng, H. F., & Gao, X. (2020). Validating a Motivational Self-Guide Scale for Language Learners. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(16), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166468

Unubi, A. S. (2019). A Contrastive Study of English and Igala Segmental Phonemes: Implications for ESLTeachers and Learners. Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Imaging, 6(6), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.14738/jbemi.66.8012

Verhaar, J. W. M. (2004). Asas-Asas Linguistik Umum. In Asas-Asas Linguistik Umum. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Wang, W., & Zhan, J. (2020). The Relationship between English Language Learner Characteristics and Online Self-Regulation: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Sustainability, 12(7), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073009

Wibowo, S. F. (2017). Fonem Segmental dan Distribusinya dalam Bahasa Rejang Dialek Musi. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 7(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v7i1.441

Downloads

Published

2024-05-29

Issue

Section

Articles