Presupposition Speech at the Tawur Kasanga Ceremony: A Pragmatic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1403.29Keywords:
speech, presumption, Tawur, KasangaAbstract
This research aims to analyze the types of presuppositions in the tawur kasanga ceremony as a pragmatic study. Pragmatics studies are always related to the problem of language use behaviour in its context. Pragmatic context includes the identity of the participant, the time parameters, and the place of the speech event, which includes the linguistic context and the physical context, which includes presuppositions. To achieve this goal, a descriptive qualitative approach was used. A qualitative approach to describe the meaning of Tawur Kasanga speech is based on pragmatic studies. The research population was taken from the narratives of a series of ceremonial activities. Considering that this event is an event that only occurs once a year, this population was immediately used as a sample. Data was collected through recordings and guided interviews. The collected data was analyzed using descriptive-qualitative techniques. The research results show: there are six presuppositions in speech, namely presuppositions: (a) existential 12 (24,489%), (b) factive 13 (26,530%), (c) lexical 11 (22,448%), (d) structural 11 (22.448%), (e) nonfactive 1 (2.040%), and (f) counterfactual 1 (2.040%).
References
Abdulameer, T. A. S. A. (2019). A Pragmatic Analysis of Deixis in a Religious Text. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(2), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n2p292.
Aminah, S. (2021). Presupposition in Kim Namjoon’s Speech at United Nation General Assembly. Professional Journal of English Education, 4(2), 172–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i2.p172-177
Andryanto, S. F., Andayani, A., & Rohmadi, M. (2014). Analisis Praanggapan pada PerCakapan Tayangan Sketsa di Trans TV [Analysis of Presuppositions in Sketch Show Conversations on Trans TV]. Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, 2(3), 1–16.
Baisu, L. (2015). Praanggapan Tindak Tutur dalam Persidangan di Kantor Pengadilan Negeri Kota Palu [Presumption of Speech Acts in Trial at the Palu City District Court Office]. Journal Bahasantodea, 3(2). hlm: 129-143.
Cummings, L. (2007). Pragmatik Sebuah Perspektif Multidisipliner [Pragmatics A Multidisciplinary Perspective]. Pustaka Pelajar.
Dondokambey, E. G. (2020). Analisis Praanggapan dalam Novel “In a Blue Moon.” [Analysis of Presuppositions in the Novel "In a Blue Moon."]. Jurnal Elektronik Fakultas Sastra Universitas Sam Ratulangi, 15(1), 1–15.
Fowler, H. W., & Fowler, F. (2000). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English. Oxford University Press.
Guswita, K. A., & Widodo, P. (2019). Presupposition Triggers in the Washington Post and Los. Lingua, 16(1), 25–36. https://doi.org10.30957/lingua.v16i1.572.
Herwandi, E., & Sari, I. (2019). Praanggapan dalam Tuturan Dialog Bahasa Persidangan di Pengadian Negeri Kelas IA Pekanbaru [Presumptions in Speech Dialogue in Trial Language at the Pekanbaru Class IA District Court]. Jurnal Gerakan Aktif Menulis, 7(2), 64–70. https://repository.uir.ac.id/22005/1/2
Ismawati, E. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra [Language and Literature Education Research Methods]. Yuma Pustaka.
Jendra, I. W. (2009). Etika Berbicara dalam Sastra Hindu: Sebuah Analisis Religiososiolinguistik [Speech Ethics in Hindu Literature: A Sociolinguistic Religious Analysis]. Udayana University Press.
Karim, Tadjuddin, M., & Abbas, A. (2019). Praanggapan dalam Pamflet Sosialisasi Pelestarian Lingkungan di Kabupaten Wakatobi [Presumptions in the Environmental Conservation Socialization Pamphlet in Wakatobi Regency]. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 7(2), 241–247.
Kennedy, R. (2002). Nigger: The Strange Career of a Troublesome Word. Ventage Books.
Krisnu, T. R. (2014). Prakertining Ayadnya [Ethics of people performing holy sacrifices]. Kemenag Kantor Wilayah Provinsi Bali.
Kristanti, M., Intan, R., & Indrayanti, T. (2022). Presuposisi dalam Video Wawancara Tokkoh Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya [Presuppositions in Video Interviews with Figures from PGRI Adi Buana University Surabaya]. Jurnal Online Fonema, 5(1), 69–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.25139/fn.v5i1.4770
Leech, G. (2015). Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik [Principles of Pragmatics]. Universitas Indonesia.
Liang, S. (2020). An Analysis of Police Interrogation from the Perspective of Presupposition: A Case Study of Jodi Arias Case. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(9), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.9.19.
Miles, B., Huberman, M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE Pub.
Mono, U., Marisha, D., & Amalia, L. (2019). Praanggapan Pragmatik: Strategi Memahami Teks Artikel [Pragmatic Presuppositions: Strategies for Understanding Article Text]. Walashri Press.
Nababan, P. W. J. (1987). Ilmu Pragmatik: Teori dan Penerapannya [Pragmatics Science: Theory and Application]. Depdikbud.
Nadar, F. X. (2013). Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik [Pragmatics and Pragmatics Research]. Graha Ilmu.
Nurchaerani, M. da. I., & E.N. (2019). Existential and Non-factive Presupposition in Candy Advertisements a Pragmatics Study. Journal of Eduscience, 4(2), 81–86. Retrieved August 4, 2023 from https://ejurnalesaunggul.ac.id/index.php/EDU/article/view/2735.
Pratiwi, I. S. dan S., & Eko. (2020). Jenis-Jenis Praanggapan pada Vlog ”Atta Halilintar” di You Tube Unggahan Maret 2020 [Types of Presuppositions in the "Atta Halilintar" Vlog on You Tube, Uploaded March 2020]. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.47709/jbsi.v2i1.1528
Pudja, I. G. (1985). Sarasamuscaya [Complete and perfect bharatakatha literature]. Departemen Agama RI.
Pudja, I. G. (1999). Bhagawad Gita (Pancama Weda). Paramita.
Putrayasa, I. B. (2014). Pragmatik [Pragmatics]. Graha Ilmu.
Rahmawati, U., & Mintowati. (2022). Praanggapan dalam Pertuturan Drama Use for My Talent Wo Qin’ai de Xiao Jiepi Karya Cai Cong [Presuppositions in Drama Speech Use for My Talent Wo Qin'ai de Xiao Jiepi by Cai Cong]. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Rasna, I. W. (2018). Developing Indonesian Instructional Materials for Lower-Grade Students of Elementary Schools Throughout Bali: An Ethnopedagogic Study. ISLLE, 377–386. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i9.2699
Rasna, I. W. (2019). A Creative Construction Model of Language Aeguisition in Linguistic Politeness for Elementary School Children, Character Education and Humanities Research. 1st International Conference on Innovation in Education (IcoIE 2018), 178, 265 –268. Retrieved August 6, 2023 from http://creativecommons.org/licences/bync/4.O/.
Rasna, I. W., Binawati, N. W. S., & Putra, I. N. T. A. (2019). The Harmony in Instructional Communication to Create a Comfortable Learning Atmosphere. Proceedings of the 4th Asian Education Symposium. http://creativecommons.org/licences/bypnc/4.0/.
Rasna, I. W., Binawati, N. W. S., Sudiana, I. G. N., Relin, R. A., & Putra, I. N. T. A. (2020). The Representation of Teacher Speech Ethics in Communicating Lessons in the Classroom to Create a Conducive Academic. Atmosphere Dalam Asean EFL Journal, 4, 58–65.
Rasna, I. W., Suandi, I. N., Putrayasa, I. B., & IK, P. (2021). Kesantunan Berbahasa Tindak Tutur Direktif pada Upacara Padiksaan [Politeness in Directive Speech Acts at Padiksaan Ceremonies]. LP2M Undiksha.
Relin, Rasna, I. W., & Binawati, W. S. (2018). Values implied in the wratisasana palm manuscripts as guideline of politeness in language of the character education: A study of theo-ethno pedagogy. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0901.11
Santeri, R. (2000). Tuhan dan Berhala [God and Idols]. Yayasan Dharma Narada.
Saputra, R. A., Zahrida, & Hati, G. M. (2021). Presupposition on Barrack Obama’s Speech at Islamic Society of Baltimore. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 5(2), 281– 289. Retrieved August 5, 2023 from https://ejurnal.unib.ac.id/index.php/JEET/article/view/13400.
Sari, A. F. (2020). Etika Komunikasi: Menanamkan Pemahaman Etika Komunikasi kepada Mahasiswa [Communication Ethics: Instilling Understanding of Communication Ethics in Students]. Jurnal Ilmiah Kohesi, 1(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35961/tanjak.v1i2.152
Sibarani, R. (2004). Antropologi Linguistik [Linguistic Anthropology]. Pola.
Sinaga, D. P., & Harahap, N. H. (2020). Praanggapan dalam Pidato Obama pada APEC CEO Summit 2014 [Presuppositions in Obama's Speech at the 2014 APEC CEO Summit]. Jurnal Ilmiah Kohesi, 4(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/Pp:1-7
Soyomukti, N. (2015). Teori-Teori Pendidikan (Neo) Liberal, Marxis, Sosialis Hingga Postmodern [(Neo) Liberal, Marxist, Socialist and Postmodern Educational Theories]. Ar Ruzz Media.
Sudarta, T. (2011). Slokantara, Untaian Ajaran Etika (Teks,Terjemahan dan Ulasan): Makna dalam Wacana prinsip-prinsip semantik dan pragmatic [Slokantara, Strand of Ethics Teachings (Text, Translation and Review): Meaning in Discourse of semantic and pragmatic principles]. CV Yrama Widya.
Suhardana, K. M. (2006). Pengantar Etika dan Moralitas Hindu: Bahan Kajian untuk Memperbaiki Tingkah Laku [Introduction to Hindu Ethics and Morality: Study Material for Improving Behavior]. Paramita.
Suhardana, K. M. (2007). Dasar-Dasar KeSulinggihan Suatu Pengantar bagi Sisia Calon Sulinggih [Fundamentals of Hindu Clergy: An Introduction for Aspiring Hindu Clergy Students]. Paramita.
Tambunan, A. R. S., Lubis., F. K., Purba, N., Girsang, M., Sembiring, E., & M.B. (2019). Presupposition in” Barbie and the Magic of Pegasus” Movie. Asian Themes in Social Sciences Research, 3(1), 18–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33094/journal.139.2019.31.18.21
Tarigan, H. G. (2015). Pengajaran Pragmatik [Pragmatics Teaching]. Angkasa.
Teeuw, A. A. (1984). Sastra dan Ilmu Sastra [Literature and Literary Science]. PT Pustaka Jaya.
Tucker, G. R. (1999). A Global Perspective on Bilingualism and Bilingual Education. Universitas Carnegie Mellon.
Wentin. (2017). Wacika Parisuda: Etika Ujaran dalam Hindu dalam Dharma Duta [Wacika Parisuda: Speech Ethics in Hinduism in Dharma Duta]. Jurnal Penerangan Agama Hindu, 15(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/Tahun2017.Hal:89-102
Wiana, I. K. (2004). Mengapa Bali Disebut Bali? [Why is Bali Called Bali?]. Paramita.
Widiastuti, Y., Badrih, M., & Busri, H. (2023). [Potential Presuppositions Containing Language Style as a Control for Speech Rationalization on the Denny Sumargo Podcast]. GHANCARAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(2), 152—168. https://doi.org/10.19105/ghancaran.v4i2.6408
Yasa, I. G. B., & Goda, Gst. G, I. (1983). Acara Agama II [Religious Event II]. Deparemen Agama R. I.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Yule, George. (2006). The Study of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Zamzani. (2007). Kajian sosiopragmatik [Sociopragmatic studies]. Cipta Pustaka.
