A Pragmatic Study of Derogation in American Election Campaign Speeches

Authors

  • Nesaem M. Al-Aadili University of Babylon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1403.16

Keywords:

derogation, impoliteness, focus of derogation, face, American election campaign speeches

Abstract

Language is sometimes used for influencing people negatively. This is done via the use of various derogatory strategies. Therefore, the present study deals with derogation pragmatically in American election campaign speeches. Precisely, the current work attempts to answer the following questions: (1) How is derogation approached pragmatically in American election campaign speeches? (2) Through which impoliteness strategies is derogation realized? (3) What is the target of derogation? Is it the public face or the personal face? And what are the foci of derogation? The study aims to find answers to the previous questions through reviewing the literature related to derogation and adopting an eclectic model for analyzing the data under investigation. Besides, a statistical means represented by the percentage equation is used to calculate the results. The main conclusion is that American presidential rivals use different impoliteness strategies to derogate each other; through this derogation either the public face or the personal face is threatened.

Author Biography

Nesaem M. Al-Aadili, University of Babylon

Department of English

References

Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in Interaction. John Benjamin Publishing Company.

Collins Cobuild English Language Dictionary. (1987). Collins Publishers.

Culpeper, J. (1996). "Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness". Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349-367.

Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D., and Wichman, A. (2003). "Impoliteness Revisited with Special References to Dynamics and Prosodic Aspects". Journal of Pragmatics, 35(10-11), 1545-1579.

Culpeper, J. (2005). "Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz show: The Weakest Link". Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 35-72.

Fraleigh, D. and Tuman, J. (2010). Freedom of Expression in the Marketplace of Ideas. Sage Publications.

Garcia-Paster, M. D. (2008). “Political campaign debates as zero-sum games: Impoliteness and power in candidates’ exchanges”. In Bousfield, Derek E. and Locher, Miriam A. (Eds) Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice (pp. 110-123). Mouton de Gruyter.

Harris, S. (2001). "Being Politically Impolite. Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse". Discourse and Society, 12(4), 451-72.

Hom, C. (2012). "A Puzzle about Pejoratives", Philosophical Studies, 159(3), 383-405.

Hornby, A. S. (2004). Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Oxford University Press.

Ilie, C. (2001). Unparliamentary Language: Insults as Cognitive Forms of Confrontation. In R. Driven, R. Frank and C. Ilie (Eds), Language and Ideology: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches (pp. 235-263). John Benjamins.

Wilson, J. (1990). Politically Speaking. The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Blackwell.

Wodak, R. and Koller, V. (2008). Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere HAL4. Walter de Gruyter.

(Web source 1). www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/derogatory. Retrieved at 2nd of June, 2023.

(Web source 2). https://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/full-text-donald-trumps-speech-on-227095. Retrieved at 10th of July, 2023.

(Web source 3). https://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/transcript-trump-speech-on-the-stakes-of-the-election-224654. Retrieved at 10th of July, 2023.

(Web source 4). https://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/transcript-hillary-clinton-alt-right-reno-227419. Retrieved at 10th of July, 2023.

(Web source 5). https://time.com/4355797/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-foreign-policy-speech-transcript./. Retrieved at 10th of July, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-29

Issue

Section

Articles