Discourse Analysis of Female Political Speeches: A Study of Linguistic Techniques and Devices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1312.18Keywords:
adult, female discourse, ideology, research designAbstract
This study explains the role of discourse analysis in understanding political speeches by shedding light on the application of theories and techniques of discourse analysis to analyse political discourse. Language is a multi-layered entity, and based on this, the study analyses the meanings and constructs that lie behind the linguistic elements in political speeches. The study is based on three female political speeches viz., those of Jacinda Ardern (the previous New Zealand Prime Minister) in Christchurch’s, the first Senate speech of Fatima Payman, a Muslim immigrant to be a senator in the Australian Senate, and the opening speech of Sanna Marin, the Prime Minister of Finland, at NYU in 2023. The selection was made using Fairclough’s Framework to identify different topics for speeches. In the analysis, the researcher unravels the underlying meaning in these speeches, and simultaneously the relationships between power and ideology, ideology and identity. Findings showed that the three speeches used many persuasive techniques and rhetorical devices with concealed meanings betraying ideological biases, and persuasive strategies to advance individual agendas.
References
Aalberg, T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2016). Introduction: Comprehending populist political communication. In Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 3-11). Routledge.
Adolphs, S., & Carter, R. (2013). Spoken corpus linguistics: From monomodal to multimodal. Routledge.
Alkhudiry, R. I., & Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H. (2020). Analysing EFL discourse of Saudi EFL learners: Identifying mother tongue interference. The Asian ESP Journal, 16(2/1), 89-109.
Auer, P. (1984). Bilingual conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bayram, F. (2010). Ideology and political discourse: A critical discourse analysis of Erdogan’s political speech. Arecls, 7(1), 23-40.
Birkland, T. A. (1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of public policy, 18(1), 53-74.
Carreon, J. R., & Svetanant, C. (2017). What lies underneath a political speech?: Critical discourse analysis of Thai PM’s political speeches aired on the TV programme returning happiness to the people. Open Linguistics, 3(1), 638-655.
Dunmire, P. L. (2012). Political discourse analysis: Exploring the language of politics and the politics of language. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(11), 735-751.
Edelman, M. (1992). Review of Language and Symbolic Power, by P. Bourdieu, J. B. Thompson, G. Raymond, & M. Adamson. Contemporary Sociology, 21(5), 717–719. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075589
Edelman, M. J. (1974).The political language of the helping professions. Politics & Society, 4(3), 295-310.
Edelman, M. J. (1985). The symbolic uses of politics. University of Illinois Press.
Edelman, S. M. (1981). Hermeneutics of ethnic rediscovery: rhetorical, sociolinguistic analysis of selected works of twentieth century American Jewish fiction. The University of Arizona.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 9-20). Routledge.
Gee, J. P., & Green, J. L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: a methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119–169. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167289
Gee, J., & Gee, J. P. (2007). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Routledge.
Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication theory, 16(4), 411-426.
Jackson, M. C. (2007). Systems approaches to management. Springer Science & Business Media.
Khajavi, Y., & Rasti, A. (2020). A discourse analytic investigation into politicians’ use of rhetorical and persuasive strategies: The case of US election speeches. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1). http://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1740051
Lazar, M. M. (2005). Politicizing gender in discourse: Feminist critical discourse analysis as political perspective and praxis. In Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse (pp. 1-28). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Leotti, S. M., Sugrue, E. P., & Winges-Yanez, N. (2022). Unpacking the worlds in our words: Critical discourse analysis and social work inquiry. Qualitative Social Work, 21(2), 260-276.
Masroor, F., Khan, Q. N., Aib, I., & Ali, Z. (2019). Polarization and ideological weaving in Twitter discourse of politicians. Social media+ society, 5(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119891220
Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 14-31). London: Sage.
Schiffrin, D. (2005). Discourse markers: Language, meaning and context. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 54–75). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Shapiro, M. J. (1988). The Politics of representation: writing practices in biography, photography, and policy analysis. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Shohamy, E. (2011). Assessing multilingual competencies: Adopting construct valid assessment policies. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 418-429.
van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42888777
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis. Belgian journal of linguistics, 11(1), 11-52.
van Dijk, T. A. (2005). War rhetoric of a little ally: Political implicatures and Aznar’s legitimatization of the war in Iraq. Journal of language and politics, 4(1), 65-91.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Critical discourse analysis and nominalization: Problem or pseudo-problem?. Discourse & Society, 19(6), 821-828.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Discourse, knowledge, power and politics. Critical discourse studies in context and cognition, 43, 27-65.
van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Critical discourse analysis. In: Brown K (ed) Encyclopaedia of language and linguistics (pp. 290–294). Oxford: Elsevier.
Veselá, J. (2021). Persuasive strategies in political speeches: A contrastive analysis of Barack Obama’s and Donald Trump’s electoral speeches (Doctoral dissertation). Masaryk University.
Williams, R. (2004). The cultural contexts of collective action: constraints, opportunities, and the symbolic life of social movements. In D. Snow, S. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 91-115). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Wodak, R. (2014). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge companion to English studies (pp. 302-316). Routledge.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2, 1-33.
Zajda, J. (2020). Discourse analysis as a qualitative methodology. Educational Practice and Theory, 42(2), 5-21.
Zanoni, P., & Janssens, M. (2015). The power of diversity discourses at work: On the interlocking nature of diversities and occupations. Organization Studies, 36(11), 1463-1483.
Zhu, L., & Wang, W. (2020). A critical discourse analysis of the US and China political speeches-based on the two speeches respectively by Trump and Wang Yi in the general debate of the 72nd session of UN assembly. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(3), 435-445.
