From Urban Space to Cyberspace: A Research on Spatial Writing and Human-Android Relations in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1312.13Keywords:
Urban space, cyberspace, Human-Android Subject, Reconstruction, Do Androids Dream of Electric SheepAbstract
Philip K. Dick takes the highly computerized but ruined Los Angeles of the United States after the post-apocalyptic war as the background and brings the cyberspace struggle between androids and humans as the novel's theme, sketching a cyberpunk society in which humans and androids fight against each other. The novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? invites people to think about cyberspace and human-androids subjectivity. Inspired by Slavoj Zizek's critical theory of cyberspace, this paper uses this science-fiction force as a text to explore how contemporary American science fiction reconstructs a revolutionary human-androids subject in cyberspace, challenging human subjectivity in the urban space. Faced with human-android coexistence, Dick affirms the coexistence of multiple subjects using equal dialogue, fully exploits the advantages of androids and humans, and constructs the subject with human-androids. Through an in-depth study of androids, this paper concludes that in a human-androids coexistence space, humans and androids should not be in a master-slave relationship; instead, they are each other's constitutive Other. Humans should try to break the boundary between self and others to accept a pluralistic and open subject.
References
Aaronson, R. S. (1996). Would Lord Running Clam wear Wubfur slippers? The ethical imperative of empathy in the alternate ecologies of Philip K. Dick: Florida Atlantic University.
Aldiss, B. W., & Wingrove, D. (1986). Trillion year spree: The history of science fiction: New York: Atheneum.
Altınoluk, S. (2020). Defining “Human”: The Blurry Line between Human, Androids, and Animals in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Journal of English Language and Literature Club, 2(1), 17-21.
Barlow, A. J. (1988). Reality, religion, and politics in Philip K. Dick's fiction: The University of Iowa.
Baudrillard, J. (1998). The consumer society: Myths and structures: Sage.
Benesch, K. (1999). Technology, Art, and the Cybernetic Body: The Cyborg as Cultural Other in Fritz Lang's" Metropolis" and Philip K. Dick's" Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?". Amerikastudien/American Studies, 44(3), 379-392.
Carlson, J. (2018). Empathy Enough: The Disorienting Power of Androids in a Posthuman World. (M.A.). Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville, Ann Arbor.
Dick, P. K. (1968). Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? : Doubleday.
Enns, A. (2006). Media, drugs, and schizophrenia in the works of Philip K. Dick. Science Fiction Studies, 33(1), 68-88.
Fitting, P. (1983). Reality as Ideological Construct: A Reading of Five Novels by Philip K. Dick (De la réalité comme construction idéologique: lecture de cinq romans de Philip K. Dick). Science Fiction Studies, 10(2), 219-236.
Galvan, J. (1997). Entering the Posthuman Collective in Philip K. Dick's" Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?". Science Fiction Studies, 24(3), 413-429.
Gassan, M. (2015). Counterfeiting and Power in Invisible Man and Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. (M.A.). University of South Carolina, Ann Arbor.
Gibson, W. (2012). Neuromancer (1984). In Crime and Media (pp. 86-94): The ACE Publishing Group.
Hayles, N. K. (2000). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. In: IOP Publishing.
Hayles, N. K. (2010). My mother was a computer: Digital subjects and literary texts: University of Chicago Press.
Hemmat, Y., & Shabrang, H. (2020). Hyperreal World and Simulated Identities in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(8), 161-170.
Hoareau, Q. (2021). “Real illusion”: The notions of “real” and “fake” in Philip K Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (M.A.). Année universitaire,
Jacoby, R. (2011). Bloodlust: On the roots of violence from Cain and Abel to the present: Simon and Schuster.
Jameson, F. (1988). Cognitive Mapping In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 54-71): Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Jameson, F. (2005). Archaeologies of the future: The desire called utopia and other science fictions: Verso.
Kim, Y. J. (2021). Posthuman as Diaspora: Focusing on Philip Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Modern Studies in English Language & Literature, 65(2), 231-250.
Kissinger, S. (2022). Mortality and Empathy: The Meaning in Death in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Prologue: A First-Year Writing Journal, 13(1), 1-11.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Maass, A. (2013). Digital Cityscapes in American Science Fiction: Physical Structure, Social Relationships, and Programmed Identities. (M.A.). Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
Moghadam, N. B., & Porugiv, F. (2018). Quiet Refusals: Androids as Others in Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(3), 10-18.
Palumbo, D. (2013). Faith and Bad Faith in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? The Journal of Popular Culture, 46(6), 1276-1288.
Rabkin, E. S. (1988). Irrational Expectations; or, How Economics and the Post-Industrial World Failed Philip K. Dick (Les espérances irrationnelles ou comment l'économie et la société postindustrielle ont trahi Philip K. Dick). Science Fiction Studies, 15(2), 161-172.
Ricoeur, P. (2007). The Course of Recognition: Harvard University Press.
Rossi, U. (2011). The twisted worlds of Philip K. Dick: A reading of twenty ontologically uncertain novels: McFarland.
Ruppenthal, E. (2007). Malfunction of the Deity: The Work and Thought of Philip K. Dick: University of Leicester (United Kingdom).
Shaddox, K. L. (2008). Accommodating the posthuman in twentieth century dystopian literature: State University of New York at Stony Brook.
Sims, C. A. (2009). The Dangers of Individualism and the Human Relationship to Technology in Philip K. Dick's "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?". Science Fiction Studies, 36(1), 67-86.
Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real‐and‐Imagined Places. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stein, W. J. (2012). On the Problem of Empathy: The Collected Works of Edith Stein Sister Teresa Bendicta of the cross discalced carmelite volume three: Springer Science & Business Media.
Toth, J. (2013). Do androids eat electric sheep?: Egotism, empathy, and the ethics of eating in the work of Philip K. Dick. Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory, 24(1), 65-85.
Vint, S. (2007). Speciesism and Species Being in" Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?". Mosaic: A journal for the interdisciplinary study of literature, 40(1), 111-126.
Zahavi, D. (2008). Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person perspective: MIT press.
Zimmerman, M. E. (2014). Authenticity, Duty, and Empathy in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? In Horizons of authenticity in phenomenology, existentialism, and moral psychology (pp. 75-92): Springer.
Zizek, S. (1996). Cyberspace, or the Virtuality of the Real. Journal of the Centre for Freudian Analysis Sc Research, 7.
Ẑiẑek, S. (1999). The ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. In: London, UK: Verso.
Žižek, S., & Daly, G. (2004). Conversations with Zizek. Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK: Polity Press.
