Rhythmic Complexity of Graduate Students’ Written Assignments: An Analysis of Their Thematic Choices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1311.24Keywords:
Rhythmic complexity, SFL, graduate students, writing, thematic choicesAbstract
The majority of the work on academic writing has focused on methods to analyse students' views of and attitudes towards writing. However, research on students' perceptions of the impact of their choices on the clarity and quality of their texts remains scant. This study used a content analysis approach to analyse graduate students’ written assignments across academic genres to understand their thematic choices, and the choices’ rhythmic effects and communicative functions. Further, it employed a grounded theory approach to examine students’ perception of the effect of their thematic choices on their assignments’ rhythmic complexity. Inspired by Martin and Rose’s (2007) semantic approach to Systematic Functional Linguistics, the study analysed 108 written assignments and conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 students. According to the findings, the assignments commonly included topical and unmarked themes, and students used different types of themes to control the rhythmic complexity and structure of the texts. Additionally, students used different thematic structures to achieve different communicative objectives, which in turn motivated them to use complex thematic patterns. Finally, students' perceptions were affected by their writing proficiency, academic and genre knowledge, linguistic background, stylistic preferences, and learning experiences.
References
Ahangari, S. (2015). Thematic organization in MA TEFL students’ argumentative, cause and effect, and process types of writing. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(12), 1–23.
Alhojailan, A. I. (2021). Developing an understanding of the sources of some graduate students’ perceptions of academic writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i2.34265
Alotaibi, H. (2020). The thematic structure in research article abstracts: Variations across disciplines. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1756146
Alyousef, H. (2016). A multimodal discourse analysis of international postgraduate business students’ finance texts: An investigation of theme and information value. Social Semiotic, 26(5), 486–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1124518
Babaii, E., Atai, M., & Shoja, L. (2016). A comparison of thematic choices and thematic Progression patterns in the research articles of well-established and emerging disciplines. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 19(2), 33–60.
Beck, S., & Jeffery, J. (2009). Genre and thinking in academic writing tasks. Journal of Literacy Research, 41, 228–272.
Chang, P., & Lee, M. (2019). Exploring textual and interpersonal themes in the expository essays of college students of different linguistic backgrounds. English for Specific Purposes, 54(2019), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.01.002
Ebrahimi, S. (2016). Theme types and patterns in research article abstracts: A cross disciplinary study. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 4(3), 104–115.
Escobar, C., & Fernández, L. (2017). EFL learners’ development of voice in academic writing: Lexical bundles, boosters/hedges and stance-taking strategies. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, (15), 96–124.
Halliday, M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (Rev. by C. M. Matthiessen). London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269. (Original work published 1985).
Halliday, M., & Hasan. R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Hawes, T. (2015). Thematic progression in the writing of students and professionals. Ampersand, 2, 93–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.06.002
Heron, M., & Corradini, E. (2019). Writing for professional recognition in higher education: Understanding genre and expertise. Higher Education Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1705256
Jing, W. (2015). Theme and thematic progression in English writing teaching. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(21), 178–187.
Kain, D. (2005). Constructing genre: A threefold typology. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(4), 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1404_2
Kim, K. (2020). An explorative study of task representation in academic writing: Second language writers in a graduate course in the United States. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 24(3), 1–24.
Leedy, P., & Ormrod, J. (2015). Practical research: Planning and design (11th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Lores, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. esp.2003.06.001
Ma, Y. (2021). Analysis of Writing Motivation for Medical University EFL Learners in China. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(11), 1474-1481. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1111.16
Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd ed.). Continuum.
Mateos, M., & Solé, I. (2009). Synthesising information from various texts: A study of procedures and products at different educational levels. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24, 435–451.
Myhill, D. (2009). Becoming a designer: Trajectories of linguistic development. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, M. Nystrand, & J. Riley (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of writing development (pp. 402–414). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Park, K., & Nam, D. (2015). Analysis of thematic structure in L2 writing: A systemic functional perspective. The SNU Journal of Education Research, 24, 65–88.
Potter, L. (2016). Ideological representations and theme-rheme analysis in English and Arabic news reports: A systemic functional approach. Functional Linguistics, 3(5), 1–20.
Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Wei, J. (2016a). Effects of instruction on Chinese college students’ thematic choice in academic writing. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(14), 60–68.
Wei, J. (2016b). Thematic choice in Chinese college students’ English essays. English for Specific Purposes, 41, 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.09.003
