Morphological Process Through Inflectional Suffixation in English and Muna Language: A Contrastive Study

Authors

  • Aderlaepe Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Mirsa Umiyati Warmadewa University
  • Hengki Mofu Universitas Papua
  • Tambunan Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Izzah Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Jismulatif Universitas Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1311.23

Keywords:

morphological process, Muna language, English, suffixation, inflectional

Abstract

The influence of regional grammar systems in learning English as a foreign language makes it difficult for students to use English. This study aims to find similarities and differences in the grammatical systems of English and Muna languages at the morphological level. Morphologically, English is a flexion type, while Muna is an incorporation type. This study uses a qualitative descriptive approach with a contrastive study method. The data used are complex words containing inflectional suffixes in English and Muna languages. Research data in English were taken from library sources in the form of textbooks, journals, newspapers, magazines, and literary works in the form of short stories. The data in the Muna language were taken from field research in the Muna area by applying the techniques of skill engagement, note-taking, elicitation and introspection. The technique of data analysis uses ICA (immediate constituent analysis). The results show that Muna inflectional suffixes are more varied than English inflectional suffixes. It is due to the morphological type of Muna as an agglutinative language, while English is a flexion language.

Author Biographies

Aderlaepe, Universitas Halu Oleo

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Mirsa Umiyati, Warmadewa University

Linguistics Department

Hengki Mofu, Universitas Papua

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Tambunan, Universitas Halu Oleo

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Izzah, Universitas Sriwijaya

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Jismulatif, Universitas Riau

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

References

Adiantika, H. N. (2020). Contrastive Analysis between Indonesian and English Declarative Sentences. ELT in Focus, 3(1), 15–25. doi:10.35706/eltinfc.v3i1.3695

Alwasilah, A. C. (1993). Linguistik: Suatu Pengantar [Linguistics: An Introduction]. Bandung: Angkasa.

Brannen, J. (2002). Memadu Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Terjemahan H. Nuktah Arwafie Kurde, dkk [Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods. Translated by H. Nuktah Arwafie Kurde et al]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Chaer, A. (2009). Psikolinguitik: Kajian Teoretik [Psycholinguistics: Theoretical Studies]. Jakarta: Ribeka Cipta.

Chastain, K. (2006). Developing Language Skills. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Matthews, P. H. (1974). Morphology: An Introduction to the Theory of Word Structure. London: Cambridge University Press.

Misdawati. (2019). Analisis Kontrastif dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa [Contrastive Analysis in Language Learning]. `A Jamiy: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab, 8(1), 53–66. doi:10.31314/ajamiy.8.1.53-66.2019

Quirk, R. (1989). A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman Group Ltd.

Quirk, R., Baum, S. G., & Leech, G. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (General Grammar). New York: Longman Inc.

Ramlan, M. (1997). Morfologi: Suatu Tinjauan Deskriptif [Morphology: A Descriptive Review]. Yogyakarta: CV. Karyono.

Ratna, I. N. K. (2009). Stilistika: Kajian Puitika Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya [Stylistics: The Study of Language Poetry, Literature, and Culture]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rohim, M., Suprapti, & Baehaqie, I. (2013). Analisis Kontrastif Bahasa Indonesia, dan Bahasa Arab Berdasarkan Kala, Jumlah dan Persona [Contrastive Analysis of Indonesian and Arabic Based on Time, Number and Persona]. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia Impian, 8(2), 1–7.

Rosyidi, M. I., Gumilar, T., Kurniawan, H., & Zumailis. (2010). Analisis Teks Sastra [Literary Text Analysis]. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Saini, S. (2016). Contrastive and Error Analyses in Inverted Order to Facilitate English Language Teaching. Beyond Words, 4(2), 158–167.

Samloy, S., & Ekoputranti, R. A. (1998). Struktur Bahasa Kisar [Kisar language structure]. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Samsuri. (1994). Analisis Bahasa [Language Analysis]. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Sande, J. S., Pattiasina, J. F., Sikki, M., Mattalitti, M. A., & Mulya, A. K. (1986). Morfosintaksis Bahasa Muna [Morphosyntax of Muna Language]. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Sudaryanto. (1992). Metode Linguistik [Linguistic Method]. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Sunaryo, H. S. (1997). Perkembangan Ludruk di Jawa Timur: Kajian Analisis Wacana [The Development of Ludruk in East Java: A Discourse Analysis Study]. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.

Uktolseja, L. J., Sujaja, H., & Matinahoru, M. F. (2019). A Contrastive Analysis between English and Indonesian Kinds of Sentences. IJET (Indonesian Journal of English Teaching), 8(1), 54–61. doi:10.15642/ijet2.2019.8.1.54-61

Yatim, N. (1992). Morfologi Kata Kerja Bahasa Muna [Morphology of Muna Language Verbs]. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-01

Issue

Section

Articles