Joe Biden’s Confidence in Addressing World Security Issue: An Interpersonal Analysis of Political Discourse

Authors

  • Heri Kusmanto Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Saipul Bahri Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Patrial Olivert Zega Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Subhilhar Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1311.17

Keywords:

appraisal, probability, political discourse

Abstract

This study aimed to discover President Joe Biden's confidence level and the realization of probability in his speech. A qualitative content analysis approach was conducted in this research. The data of this research were the speeches of Joe Biden on several occasions accessed from YouTube. Furthermore, the data were transcribed and then analyzed using probability theory. Therefore, the analysis result indicated that Joe Biden has high confidence. This result can be observed through his speech that he tends to use a high degree of probability in stating his plans, promises, and predictions of the policies he will implement. The probabilities used by Joe Biden also tend to vary in forms such as modal verbs, modal verb phrases, adjectives, adverbs, and nouns.appraisal

Author Biographies

Heri Kusmanto, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Department of Political Sciences, 

Saipul Bahri, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Department of Political Sciences

Patrial Olivert Zega, Universitas Sumatera Utara

English Department

Subhilhar, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Department of Political Sciences

References

Amalia, M., Subandowo, D., Faliyanti, E., & Thresia, F. (2018). An Analysis of Domain Mood and Modality of Interpersonal Meaning in Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY)’s Speech. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 1(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v1i1.144

Amin, M., Humaizi, H., Rahmadani, S., & Yusuf, M. (2022). Political Power Shift in the House of Representative of North Sumatra Province, Indonesia: A Political Communication of Post-election. Studies in Media and Communication, 10(2), 122. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v10i2.5571

Bakuuro, J. (2017). Demystifying Halliday’s Metafunctions of Language. International Journal of Language and Literature, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.15640/ijll.v5n2a21

Butt, D. G. (2019). Firth and the Origins of Systemic Functional Linguistics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 11–34). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337936.003

Dalamu, T. O. (2019). Halliday’s Mood System: A Scorecard of Literacy in the English Grammar in an L2 Situation / O sistema de modo de Halliday: um quadro de resultados sobre o conhecimento da gramática da língua inglesa como L2. Revista De Estudos Da Linguagem, 27(1), 241. https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.27.1.241-274

Darani, L. H. (2014). Persuasive Style and its Realization Through Transitivity Analysis: A SFL Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.066

Eggins, S. (2004a). An Introduction to Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics. In Journal for the Study of English Linguistics.

Eggins, S. (2004b). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. Continuum.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar (1st ed.). E. Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar 2nd edition (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2014). Introduction to Functional Grammar-. Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar 3rd Edition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771

Humaizi, Yusuf, M., & Sinaga, R.S. (2019). The Interest Pattern of Ethnic Groups as Supporters: A Case Study of Pilkada of Medan City in 2015. Intellectual Discourse, 27(1), 269–283. https://journals.iium.edu.my/intdiscourse/index.php/id/article/view/1356

Li, X. (2019). Analysis of Discourse from Perspective of Systemic Functional Grammar. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(8), 1049. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0908.25

Martin, J. R. (1995). Interpersonal meaning, persuasion and public discourse: Packing semiotic punch. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 15(1), 33–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268609508599515

Martin, J. R. (2009). Language, register and genre. In Applied Linguistic Methods: A Reader.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse : meaning beyond the clause. Continuum.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2007). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. In The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910

Matthiessen, C. (1995). Lexicogrammatical cartography : English systems.

McLeod, S., & McCormack, J. (2015). Introduction to speech, language and literacy (S. McLeod & J. McCormack, Eds.; Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Fourth Edition. In The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods.

O’Hair, D., Rubenstein, H., Stewart, R., Wittenberg-Lyles, E., Villagran, M. M., & Boston New York, S. (2007). Instructor’s Resource Manual A Pocket Guide to Public Speaking Second Edition. www.freethechildren.com.

Reiss, K. (1981). Type, Kind and Individuality of Text: Decision Making in Translation. Poetics Today, 2(4), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772491

Rose, D. (2008). Negotiating Kinship: the language of intersubjectivity in an Australian culture. WORD, 59(1–2), 189–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2008.11432586

Thompson, G. (2013). Introducing Functional Grammar. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431474

Ye, R. (2010). The Interpersonal Metafunction Analysis of Barack Obama’s Victory Speech. English Language Teaching, 3(2).

Yu, H., & Wu, C. (2016). Recreating the image of Chan master Huineng: the roles of MOOD and MODALITY. Functional Linguistics, 3(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-016-0027-z

Downloads

Published

2023-11-01

Issue

Section

Articles