Assessing Saudi EFL Learners’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies: A Cross-Sectional Study

Authors

  • Tarek A. Alkhaleefah Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1311.07

Keywords:

metacognition, reading strategies, survey of reading strategies (SORS), language proficiency groups

Abstract

With extant studies producing inconclusive findings regarding English as foreign language (EFL) readers’ metacognitive strategies, researchers are yet to investigate the perceived metacognitive awareness and use of reading strategies among tertiary EFL learners with varying proficiency levels, an area that has not fully received attention in the Saudi context. Hence, this study investigated differences in the metacognitive reading strategies that Saudi students learning English as a foreign language used when reading English texts to determine whether metacognitive awareness varied across proficiency levels (low, intermediate, and high). The study adapted and administered the Survey of Reading Strategies questionnaire to 260 Saudi English majors and analyzed the data using independent-samples ANOVA across the three proficiency groups, and found how participants varied in their perceived use of reading strategies across global, problem-solving, and support strategy categories. Overall, EFL learners with high-proficiency reported global and problem-solving strategies more often than intermediate- and low-proficient groups did, while low-proficiency group reported using support strategies more often than high- and intermediate-proficiency groups did. The study results also revealed how problem-solving strategies were most frequently reported by study participants, followed by support and global strategies. Subsequently, two major pedagogical implications are discussed: the need for Saudi EFL readers to be exposed to diverse reading strategies to help facilitate their reading comprehension of English texts, as well to reading-strategy instruction, which should emphasize global, problem-solving, and support strategies for Saudi EFL learners with varying reading abilities across different reading tasks.

Author Biography

Tarek A. Alkhaleefah, Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU)

Department of English Language and Literature, College of Languages and Translation

References

Ahmadian, M., & Pasand, G. P. (2017). EFL learners’ use of online metacognitive reading strategies and its relation to their self-efficacy in reading. Reading Matrix, 17(2), 117–132.

Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge University Press.

Alhaqbani, A., & Riazi, M. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use in Arabic as a second language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(2), 231-255.

Alkhaleefah, T. A. (2017). Saudi EFL learners’ reported reading problems and strategic processing of text types: A think-aloud case study. Reading Psychology, 38(7), 687-730.

Alkhaleefah, T. A. (2016). Taxonomies in L1 and L2 reading strategies: A critical review of issues surrounding strategy-use definitions and classifications in previous think-aloud research. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 16(2), 162-226.

Al-Nujaidi, A. H. (2003). The relationship between vocabulary size, reading strategies, and reading comprehension of EFL learners in Saudi Arabia [Doctoral dissertation]. Oklahoma State University.

Al-Qahtani, A. A. (2020). Investigating metacognitive think-aloud strategy in improving Saudi EFL learners’ reading comprehension and attitudes. English Language Teaching, 13(9), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n9p50

Al Rasheed, H. S. S. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of pre-reading strategies on Saudi EFL college students’ reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 7(11), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n11p79

Al-Sobhani, Y. A. (2013). Metacognitive reading strategies use by Yemeni EFL undergraduate university students. Frontiers in Language Teaching, 4(1), 121–130.

Bilici, Ö. U., & Subaşı, G. (2022). EFL learners’ metacognitive awareness of global reading strategies and L2 reading comprehension skills: The efficacy of reciprocal teaching. The Reading Matrix, 22(2), 170-185.

Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb02534.x

Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21-29). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Grabe, W. (2008). Reading in a second Language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.

Grabe, W. P., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and researching: Reading. Routledge.

Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587625

Ghaith, G., & El-Sanyoura, H. (2019). Reading comprehension: The mediating role of metacognitive strategies. Reading in a Foreign Language, 31(1), 19–43.

Hong-Nam, K., & Leavell, A. G. (2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System, 34(3), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.02.002

Huang, S. (2006). Reading English for academic purposes: What situational factors may motivate learners to read? System, 34(3), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.04.006

Jafari, S. M., & Shokrpour, N. (2012). The reading strategies used by Iranian ESP students to comprehend authentic expository texts in English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(4), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.4p.102

Malcolm, D. (2009). Reading strategy awareness of Arabic-speaking medical students studying in English. System, 37(4), 640–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.008

Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive reading strategies, motivation and reading comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p117

Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249

Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2–11.

Muhid, A., Amalia, E. R., Hilaliyah, H., Budiana, N., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive strategies implementation on students’ reading comprehension achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 847–862. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13257a

Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251x(94)00047-a

Pammu, A., Amir, Z., & Maasum, T. N. (2014). Metacognitive reading strategies of less proficient tertiary learners: A case study of EFL learners at a public university in Makassar, Indonesia. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.049

Park, Y. (2010). Korean EFL college students’ reading strategy use to comprehend authentic expository/technical texts in English [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Kansas.

Pressley, M., & Gaskins, I. W. (2006). Metacognitively competent reading comprehension is constructively responsive reading: How can such reading be developed in students? Metacognitive Learning, 1(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-7263-7

Prichard, C. (2014). Reading strategy use of low- and high-proficiency learners and the effect of reading instruction. Bulletin of Higher Education Okayama University, 10, 115–122.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431–449. https://oi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(01)00039-2

Tavakoli, H. (2014). The effectiveness of metacognitive strategy awareness in reading comprehension: The case of Iranian university EFL students. Reading Matrix, 14(2), 314–336.

Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognitive Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0

Yüksel, İ. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of academic reading strategies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 894–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.164

Zhang, L. (2018). Metacognitive and cognitive strategy use in reading comprehension: A structural equation modelling approach. Springer.

Zhang, L. J., & Wu, A. (2009). Chinese senior high school EFL students’ metacognitive awareness and reading-strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 37–59.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-01

Issue

Section

Articles