Who Are Active and Inactive Participants in Online Collaborative Writing? Considerations From an EFL Setting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1310.15Keywords:
collaborative writing, EFL learners, online collaborative writing, student interaction, writing contributionsAbstract
This study investigated learners’ online collaborative writing (CW) behaviours. The participants were 115 EFL students from different Asian countries at a private international university in Thailand. The quantitative data was collected from students’ writing contributions on two collaborative writing tasks: descriptive and argumentative essays. Data was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Bonferroni Post Hoc Test. The analysis from the one-way ANOVA test revealed a significant difference between groups regarding percentage of text contribution in CW tasks. Qualitative data was also collected from students’ reflective journals and observations, where factors that influenced team collaboration were examined. The qualitative findings showed that students with higher language proficiency levels were the prominent authors who contributed more text to their group tasks. Elements affecting learners’ active and inactive participations in team collaborations include student language proficiency, individual goal, designated roles, collaboration platforms, learning preference, topic familiarity, and influence of teacher. Some implications of the findings are discussed.
References
Abe, M. (2020). Interactional practices for online collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100752
Bahar, M. (2003). The effect of instructional methods on the performance of the students having different cognitive styles. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(24), 26-32.
Chen, W. (2019). An exploratory study on the role of L2 collaborative writing on learners’ subsequent individually composed texts. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(6), 563-573.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40-58.
Elabdali, R. (2021). Are two heads really better than one? A meta-analysis of the L2 learning benefits of collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100788
Elabdali, R., & Arnold, N. (2020). Group dynamics across interaction modes in L2 collaborative wiki writing. Computers and Composition, 58, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102607
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51-71.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström., R. Miettinen, & R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 377- 404). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gillies, R. M. (2006). Teachers' and students' verbal behaviours during cooperative and small‐group learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 271-287.
Guo, K., Bussey, F., & Adachi, C. (2020). Digital learning across cultures: an account of activity theory. Intercultural Education, 31(4), 447-461.
Hancock, C. L., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Using cultural historical activity theory to uncover praxis for inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(9), 937-953.
Issroff, K., & Scanlon, E. (2002). Using technology in higher education: An activity theory perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00213.x
Jeong, K.O. (2016). A Study on the integration of Google Docs as a web-based collaborative learning platform in EFL writing instruction. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(39), 1-7.
Jiang, D., Renandya, W., & Zhang, L. J. (2017). Evaluating ELT multimedia courseware from the perspective of cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30, 726–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1359187.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning: The teacher’s role. In R. M. Gillies, A. Ashman, & J. Terwel (Eds.), The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom. New York, NY: Springer.
Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41–58.
Kitjaroonchai, N. (2021). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on learners’ writing performance and interactions in a multilingual English classroom (Doctoral dissertation, School of Foreign Languages, Institute of Social Technology Suranaree University of Technology).
Kitjaroonchai, N. (2022). The Effect of Collaborative Writing Tasks on EFL University Students' Writing Performance. Human Behavior, Development & Society, 23(3), 20-31.
Kitjaroonchai, N., & Suppasetseree, S. (2021a). A case study of ASEAN EFL learners’ collaborative writing and small group interaction patterns in Google Docs. English Language Teaching, 14(5), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n5p89
Kitjaroonchai, N., & Suppasetseree, S. (2021b). Online collaborative writing via Google Docs: Case studies in the EFL classroom. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(6), 922-934. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1206.08
Krishnan, J., Cusimano, A., Wang, D., & Yim, S. (2018). Writing together: Online synchronous collaboration in middle school. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(2), 163-173.
Krishnan, J., Yim, S., Wolters, A., & Cusimano, A. (2019). Supporting online synchronous collaborative writing in the secondary classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(2), 135-145.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2004). Do online collaborative groups need leaders? In T. Roberts (Ed.), Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice (pp. 262-280). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Li, M., & Kim, D. (2016). One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.002
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Explaining dynamic interactions in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 96-120.
Liu, M., Liu, L., & Liu, L. (2018). Group awareness increases student engagement in online collaborative writing. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.04.001
Mahmoudi, S., & Mahmoudi, A. (2017). Can topic familiarity override language proficiency in reading comprehension? Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(3), 496-506.
McDonough, K., & De Vleeschauwer, J. (2019). Comparing the effect of collaborative and individual prewriting on EFL learners’ writing development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 123-130.
Olson, J. S., Wang, D., Olson, G. M., & Zhang, J. (2017). How people write together now: Beginning the investigation with advanced undergraduates in a project course. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 24(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3038919
Qiu, X., & Lee, M. K. (2020). Regulated learning and self-efficacy beliefs in peer collaborative writing: An exploratory study of L2 learners’ written products, task discussions, and self-reports. System, 93, 1-15.
Rada, R. (1996). Groupware and Authoring. New York: Academic Press
Savasci, M., & Kaygisiz, S. (2019). One hand washes the other and both wash the face: Individuality versus collaboration in L2 writing. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 131-151.
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119-158.
Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Teng, M. F. (2021). Interactive-whiteboard-technology-supported collaborative writing: Writing achievement, metacognitive activities, and co-regulation patterns. System, 97, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102426
Wang, D., Olson, J. S., Zhang, J., Nguyen, T., & Olson, G. M. (2015). DocuViz: visualizing collaborative writing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1865-1874). ACM.
Wang, D., Tan, H., & Lu, T. (2017). Why users do not want to write together when they are writing together: Users' rationales for today's collaborative writing practices. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(CSCW), 1-18.
Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 1-28.
