Place, Class, and the Destruction of the American Dream in The Great Gatsby From the Perspective of Space

Authors

  • Yue Wu Southwest University
  • Jinsong Shen Southwest University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1310.08

Keywords:

The Great Gatsby, Lefebvre, space, class

Abstract

This study is a spatial analysis of The Great Gatsby (1925). This novel presents the power game among various white classes in American society in the context of the Roaring Twenties, with obvious spatial characteristics. The geographical distribution between East Egg, West Egg, and the Valley of Ashes presents the high-and-low-class distinction of different classes in social space. The upper classes practice class oppression and exploitation through space, while the lower classes also use space to resist oppression and climb the class ladder. This paper draws on French philosopher Henri Lefebvre’s spatial ideas, especially the spatial triad, to explore the close connection between space and class in the novel. The Great Gatsby encompasses various class groups in white society, including the hereditary aristocracy like the Buchanans, the new money represented by Gatsby, and the lower class represented by the Wilsons. To modify the spatial order, different classes use space as a medium to preserve their class identity and seek their social presence, which reproduces the illusion of the American Dream of the Jazz Age and reveals Fitzgerald’s humanistic concern for people in spatial relations.

Author Biographies

Yue Wu, Southwest University

School of Foreign Languages

Jinsong Shen, Southwest University

School of Foreign Languages

References

Bachelard, Gaston. (1964). The Poetics of Space. New York: The Orion Press.

Chun, Jin-Nong. (2009). Re-reading The Great Gatsby with a Focus on the Question of Class, Love, and Sexuality. Studies in Modern Fiction, 16(3), 327-350.

Frank, Joseph. (1993). The Idea of Spatial Form. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Fitzgerald, F. Scott. (1993). The Great Gatsby. UK: Wordsworth Editions Limited.

Hayes, E.T. (2004). The Named and the Nameless: Morrison’s 124 and Naylor’s “the Other place” as semiotic ‘Chorae’. African American Review, 38(4), 669-681.

Hee, Jung Shin & Han, Sangsoo. (2016). Spatial Relativity on The Great Gatsby and About Time. The New Studies of English Language & Literature, 63(1), 69-83.

Lefebvre, Henri. (1991). The Production of Space. trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith, Cambridge: Blackwell.

Kim, Myungsung. (2018). Commodity Culture, Class Anxiety, and the Deconstruction of Old American Aristocracy: The Valentinian Allusion in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby. The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature, 60(1), 23-40.

Vince, Raymond M. (2006). The Great Gatsby and the Transformations of Space-Time: Fitzgerald's Modernist Narrative and the New Physics of Einstein. The F. Scott Fitzgerald Review, 5(1), 86-108.

Wilson, Edmund. (1945). The Crack-Up. New York: New Directions.

Watkins, Ceri. (2005). Representations of Space, Spatial Practices and Spaces of Representation: An Application of Lefebvre’s Spatial Triad. Culture and Organization, 11(3), 209-220.

Yeonman, Kim. (2016). Cityscape and Tragedy in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby. Modern Studies in English Language and Literature, 60(1), 307-318.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-02

Issue

Section

Articles