Critical Strategies Featured on the “Arab Idol” and “American Idol” Shows
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1306.21Keywords:
criticism, criticism strategies, speech acts theory, Arab Idol show, American Idol showAbstract
This study assesses the strategies with which judges on the “Arab Idol” and “American Idol” shows offer criticism to contestants with a particular focus on the differences between male and female judges. To ensure a comprehensive behavioral examination, this study looks at 60 comments stemming from the audition phase of each program, resulting in a total of 120 comments. This study employs Nguyen’s (2005) coding scheme of criticism as the foundation of its analysis. The results show that female judges on both the Arab and American shows use more indirect strategies in their criticisms while male judges prefer direct strategies. Additionally, the results indicate that the direct strategies typically entail the ‘negative evaluation and identification of a problem,’ while the indirect strategies often provide ‘advice about change and suggestions for change.’
References
Ali, Sh. (2020). A Cross-Cultural Study of Criticism Strategies: Iraqi and Malay ESL Learners. Basic Education College Magazine, 107(26), 29-72.
Al Kayed, M., & Al-Ghoweri, H. (2019). A Socio-Pragmatic Study of Speech Act of Criticism in Jordanian Arabic. European Journal of Scientific Research, 153(1), 105-117.
Alshkhanbeh, Sumaya & Alghazo, Sharif (2022). A Pragmatic Analysis of Criticism Strategies against Government Policies on Social Media in Jordan: A Gender-Based Investigation. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 14(2), 263-285.
Alshara’, A. (2013). A Sociolinguistic Study of the Speech Act of Criticism. Unpublished MA thesis. Irbid: Yarmouk University.
Cao, J. (2005). A Pragmatic Analysis of the Speech Act of Criticism in Primary and Junior High School Chinese Lecturer-Student Talk. MA thesis, Northeast Normal University. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
Darweesh, A. (2011). Speech Act of Criticizing in MSA Arabic. Basic Education College Magazine, 6(1), 59-78.
El-Dakhs, D., Ambreen, F., Zaheer, M., & Gusarova, Y. (2019). A Pragmatic Analysis of the Speech Act of Criticizing in University Teacher-Student Talk. Pragmatics, 29(4), 493-520.
Hoa, H. (2007). Criticizing Behaviors by the Vietnamese and the American: topics, social factors and frequency. VNU Journal of Science, Foreign Languages, 23, 141-154.
Nguyen, M. (2005a). Criticizing and Responding to Criticism in a Foreign Language: A study of Vietnamese learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Auckland, Auckland.
Nguyen, M. (2013b). An Exploratory Study of Criticism Realization Strategies Used by NS and NNS of New Zealand English. Multilingua, 32(1), 103-130.
Seyedeh, H., & Hojjat, M. (2019). Criticism strategies and their underlying cultural norms in online interactions: A study of native speakers of Persian and English. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 12(3), 267-287.
Shang-Chao, M. (2008), Study on the Differences of Speech Act of Criticism in Chinese and English. US-China Foreign Language, 6(3), 74-77.
Thomas, J. (1996). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Tracy, K., Donna, D., & Robinson, S. (1987). Good and Bad Criticism: A Descriptive Analysis. Journal of Communication, 37(2), 46-59.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
