Contextualizing Revitalization of Panai Malay Archaic Vocabularies Through Formal Learning

Authors

  • Hilman Haidir Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • T. Silvana Sinar Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Mulyadi Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Eddy Setia Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Erikson Saragih Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1306.19

Keywords:

revitalization, vocabulary, archaic, Malay, Panai

Abstract

The study of the disappearance of local languages throughout the world continues to spark the interest of linguists. Even though this fear has been raised in several Indonesian government initiatives, academics have completed a comparatively limited study on local language vocabulary in Indonesia, particularly The Panai Malay Language (PML), which continues to decrease in its usage by its speakers. The objectives of this study are to describe the features of archaic vocabularies of the Panai Malay language and to investigate the pattern of Panai Malay language revitalization. The research was conducted using a qualitative research method with the ethnography research design by using 591 vocabularies as research data sources.  The results of this study reveal that PML archaic vocabularies are found in 10 domains, namely the realm of family, agriculture, housing, food-beverage, customs, health, marine, human body, clothing, and human nature. The archaic domains of PML vocabularies are more dominantly found in the domains of human nature, namely 30 vocabularies or 8.15% for teenage respondents, while according to adult respondents 13 vocabulary (9.70%), and older people by 12 words (13.48%). The revitalization of archaic vocabularies of PML should be implemented through formal efforts by integrating the language material in the formal learning process through the Local Content Curriculum as well as by writing the PML Dictionary which should be shared through social media such as Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp. Revitalization through non-formal channels should be carried out through communication training, publishing folklore by incorporating PML archaic vocabularies, and reactivating PML cultural activities.

References

Ahmad, M. H. (2018). Reviewing Lexicology of Nusantara Language. Journal of Malay Islamic Studies, 2(1), 230–231.

Amano, T., Sandel, B., Eager, H., Bulteau, E., Svenning, J. C., Dalsgaard, B., Rahbek, C., Davies, R. G., & Sutherland, W. J. (2014). Global distribution and drivers of language extinction risk. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1793), 17–19. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1574

Ariyani, F., Putrawan, G. E., Riyanda, A. R., Idris, A. R., Misliani, L., & Perdana, R. (2022). Technology and minority language: an Android-based dictionary development for the Lampung language maintenance in Indonesia. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2021.2015088

Aziz, Z. A., Yusuf, S. B., Mustafa, F., & Munawarah, S. (2020). Acehnese Archaic Words in Hikayat: An Early Influential Literary Work. Lingua Cultura, 14(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v14i2.6498

Barrett, R. (2016). Mayan language revitalization, hip hop, and ethnic identity in Guatemala. Language and Communication, 47, 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2015.08.005

Bodo, C., Fazakas, N., & Heltai, J. I. (2017). Language revitalization, modernity, and the csángó Mode of speaking. Open Linguistics, 3(1), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0016

Chasaide, A., Ní Chiaráin, N., Berthelsen, H., Wendler, C., & Murphy, A. (2015). Speech Technology as Documentation for Endangered Language Preservation: The Case of Irish. ICPhS 2015: 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, August, forthcoming

Comajoan-Colomé, L., & Coronel-Molina, S. M. (2021). What does language revitalisation in the twenty-first century look like? New trends and frameworks. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42(10), 897–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1827643

Dou, J., Qin, J., Jin, Z., & Li, Z. (2018). Knowledge graph based on domain ontology and natural language processing technology for Chinese intangible cultural heritage. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 48(30), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2018.06.005

Erni Yulis, Jufrizal, H. A. (2013). An analysis of dead words of minangkabaunese in koto tabang-pariaman dialect. English Language and Literature, 2(September), 99–105. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/ell/article/view/2398

Grenoble, L. A., & Whaley, L. J. (2021). Toward a new conceptualisation of language revitalisation. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42(10), 911–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1827645

Guerrettaz, A. M. (2020). “We are the mayas”: Indigenous language revitalization, identification, and postcolonialism in the Yucatan, Mexico. Linguistics and Education, 58, 100765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100765

Haidir, H., & Sinar, T. S. (2019). Arkais vocabulary identification as efforts to revitalize the language with a Panai: Ecolinguistic perspective. International Journal of Linguistics …, 2(6), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2019.2.6.3

Karagulova, B., Kushkimbayeva, A., Kurmanbayeva, S., AlimKhan, A., & Kaiyrbaeva, Z. (2016). Linguocultural description and formation of archaic words. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(14). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i14/91080

Macaro, E., Akincioglu, M., & Han, S. (2020). English medium instruction in higher education: Teacher perspectives on professional development and certification. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 30(1), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12272

Ms Gevani Prahalatha. (2015). Some Archaic Word forms Dropped by Jaffna Tamil Society. International Journal of Language and Literature, 3(1), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijll.v3n1a24

Ndhlovu, K., & Botha, R. (2017). Euphemism vs explicitness: A corpus-based analysis of translated taboo words from English to Zimbabwean Ndebele. South African Journal of African Languages, 37(2), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2017.1378278

Pelzer, K., Stebbins, J. F., Prinz, F. B., Borisov, A. S., Hazendonk, P., Hayes, P. G., Abele, M., Nmr, S., York, N., Santibáñez-Mendieta, A. B., Didier, C., Inglis, K. K., Corkett, A. J., Pitcher, M. J., Zanella, M., Shin, J. F., Daniels, L. M., Rakhmatullin, A., Li, M. M., … Society, C. (2017). No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における 健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title. Solid State Ionics, 2(1), 1–10. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167273817305726%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01772-1%0Ahttp://www.ing.unitn.it/~luttero/laboratoriomateriali/RietveldRefinements.pdf%0Ahttp://www.intechopen.com/books/spectroscopic-analyses-developme

Premsrirat, S. (2014). Redefining “Thainess”: Embracing diversity, preserving unity. Contemporary Socio-Cultural and Political Perspectives in Thailand, III, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7244-1_1

Rundell, M. (2014). Macmillan English Dictionary: The End of Print? Slovenščina 2.0: Empirical, Applied and Interdisciplinary Research, 2(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4312/slo2.0.2014.2.1-14

Sakhiyya, Z., & Martin-Anatias, N. (2020). Reviving the language at risk: a social semiotic analysis of the linguistic landscape of three cities in Indonesia. International Journal of Multilingualism, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1850737

Saltzman, M. (2017). Jejueo talking dictionary: A collaborative online database for language revitalization. Methods in the Study of Endangered Languages, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w17-0117

Sapir, Y. (2017). The Revitalization of Elfdalian. Fel Xxi 19–21, 50–57.

Siregar, I. (2022). Effective and Efficient Treatment of Regional Language Preservation Strategies in the Nusantara. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 4(2), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2022.4.2.3

Takwa, Arafah, B., Sopiandy, D., Taqfiah, S. J., & Arafah, A. N. B. (2022). Humanistic Values in Metaphoric Expressions of Traditional Marriage in Tolaki Mekongga Kolaka. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(8), 1602–1608. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1208.16

Triana Sinaga, N., Sibarani, R., . P., & Agustono, B. (2021). The Local Wisdom of the Mangarou Totok Spell Towards Natural Resources in the Simalungun Community: An Anthropolinguistic Study. KnE Social Sciences, 2021, 437–449. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i4.8702

Zhang, C., & Ma, Q. (2012). The protection of endangered languages in Mainland China. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 713–718. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.4.713-718

Downloads

Published

2023-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles