Figurative Language Used by Australian Facebookers During COVID-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1305.17Keywords:
speech acts, Austin, COVID-19, Australian facebookers, war metaphorsAbstract
This study investigated the metaphorical speech acts used by Australian commentators on Facebook during COVID-19. The sample contained 50 Facebook comments that were analyzed qualitatively. The study adopted Searle taxonomy of speech acts, namely, directive, assertive, expressive, commissive, and declarative. This helped in identifying the different functions of the metaphorical speech acts. Moreover, Austin taxonomy of speech act forms, namely, locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary, was adopted. The findings revealed that the most common types of metaphors that were used by the Australian commentators were war and conflict metaphors, followed by psychological status metaphors and irony metaphors. The study found that war and conflict metaphors were the most commonly used forms of speech by the commentators. This is in alignment with the literature that also highlights how the advent of a crisis, such as COVID-19, results in excessive use of war and militarized metaphors. The study found that the most common speech act was directive, while expressive was the least common form used by Australian commentators during the COVID-19 pandemic.
References
Abdullayeva, O. I. Q. (2022). Study of pragmatic meaning of English in Uzbek language. Science and Education, 3(2), 642-645. Retrieved February 16, 2022 from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/study-of-pragmatic-meaning-of-english-in-uzbek-language.
Amoussou, F., & Allagbe, A. A. (2018). Principles, theories and approaches to critical discourse analysis. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 6(1), 11-18. Retrieved January 7, 2018 from https://www.academia.edu/download/63811302/Principles-Theories__Approaches_to_CDA20200702-2976-66oy7y.pdf
Andimara, S., Haryanto, S., & Haryati, D. (2020). A pragmatic analysis of figurative language in guardian of galaxy movies (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta). Retrieved August 22, 2022 from http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/85437
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1965Austin1965How to Do Things with Words. https://www.academia.edu/36270217/Austin_1962_how_to_do_things_with_words
Barcelona, A. (2019). Metonymy. Cognitive linguistics: Foundations of language, 167-194. Retrieved July 8, 2019 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110626476/pdf#page=173
Belligh, T., & Willems, K. (2021). What's in a code? The code-inference distinction in Neo-gricean pragmatics, relevance theory, and integral linguistics. Language Sciences, 83, 101310. Retrieved July 8, 2022 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000120300425
Branagan, A., Cross, M., & Parsons, S. (2020). Language for behaviour and emotions: A practical guide to working with children and young people. Routledge. Retrieved October 29, 2020 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=nd38DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Figurative+expression+of+the+same+can+help+in+understanding+the+emotions+of+a+person+with+greater+clarity.+&ots=fatU6q06AX&sig=sqSta7MymdPUTn8ovvbg1Yd9b5E
Burkhardt, A. (Ed.). (2010). Speech acts, meaning and intentions: critical approaches to the philosophy of John R. Searle. Walter de Gruyter. Retrieved September 15, 2010 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=yARprbOy3ZEC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Austin+established+the+speech+act+theory,+which+was+&ots=IdMlN6Hi-v&sig=zrBycNrQUmUg4rT52hkgGSw5A5I
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., ... & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661. Retrieved June 18, 2020 from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1744987120927206
Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Springer. Retrieved October 26, 2011 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=IkSBDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Politicians+commonly+use+metaphors+to+communicate+ideas,+show+events,+and+explain+concepts.+&ots=Cq0ungMbKR&sig=u1REYkhbbOtoOyDNXRS_OnCoxP8
Cheney, G., Christensen, L. T., Zorn Jr, T. E., & Ganesh, S. (2010). Organizational communication in an age of globalization: Issues, reflections, practices. Waveland Press. Retrieved June 2, 2010 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TcQSAAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=Use+of+metaphors+in+social+media+campaigns+has+multiple+benefits.+People+become+so+habituated+to+repeating+the+same+terms+/+expressions+in+the+same+ways+that+they+lose+track+of+what+they+signify.+&ots=AGaOBrnqfr&sig=i4uSRoPKS4GSr74oW2w94CNsugY
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist program: /Noam Chomsky. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 420, 5.
Culpeper, J., Mackey, A., & Taguchi, N. (2018). Second language pragmatics: From theory to research. Routledge. Retrieved May 3, 2018 from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315692388/second-language-pragmatics-jonathan-culpeper-alison-mackey-naoko-taguchi
Cutting, J., & Fordyce, K. (2020). Pragmatics: a resource book for students. Routledge. Retrieved November 26 2020 from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781003010043/pragmatics-joan-cutting-kenneth-fordyce
Deignan, A., Littlemore, J., & Semino, E. (2013). Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved January 19, 2013 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=P3GcEZ4jlrwC&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=Recent+study+has+looked+at+various+genres+and+registers+and+found+that+linguistic+metaphors+differ+significantly+even+when+the+subject+matter+of+the+texts+is+closely+similar&ots=nd2LzBSVgK&sig=YwSkqOtc6zcIHhT4rab3C5gSVW8
Dobrovol’skij, D., & Piirainen, E. (2018). Conventional figurative language theory and idiom motivation. Yearbook of Phraseology, 9(1), 5-30. Retrieved November 8, 2018 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/phras-2018-0003/html
Ellis, N. C. (2019). Essentials of a theory of language cognition. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 39-60. Retrieved January 16, 2019 From https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/modl.12532
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. Retrieved December 22, 2015 from https://www.academia.edu/download/55796997/Comparison_Convenience_and_Purposive_Sampling-2016_4p.pdf
Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2013). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Routledge. Retrieved January 23, 2012 https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203137888/political-discourse-analysis-isabela-fairclough-norman-fairclough
Gibbs Jr, R. W. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse processes, 48(8), 529-562. Retrieved May 2, 2013 from https://academic.oup.com/applij/article-abstract/35/2/117/191535
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Sage publications. Retrieved November 9, 2011 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Hr11DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=thematic+analysis+methods+&ots=Xj1zsGxGtI&sig=D5r8Y85IW6bBcK4lAnkNo344G4A
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Introduction to applied thematic analysis. Applied Thematic Analysis, 3(20), 1-21. Retrieved October 7, 2019 from http://antle.iat.sfu.ca/wp-content/uploads/Guest_2012_AppliedThematicAnlaysis_Ch1.pdf
Hancock, G. R., Mueller, R. O., & Stapleton, L. M. (2010). The reviewer's guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences. Routledge. Retrieved February 11, 2010 https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203861554/reviewer-guide-quantitative-methods-social-sciences-gregory-hancock-gregory-hancock-ralph-mueller-laura-stapleton-ralph-mueller
Hanks, P. (2018). Types of speech acts. New work on speech acts, 123-143. Retrieved August 15, 2018 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=rthjDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT146&dq=The+taxonomy+of+speech+act+in+classification+of+the+work+of+Austin+&ots=cL872e-Mj3&sig=VyAeNkyAaNYRjR169mwgmklNhZ8
Hanne, M. (2022). How we escape capture by the “war” metaphor for COVID-19. Metaphor and Symbol, 37(2), 88-100. Retrieved March 31, 2022 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10926488.2021.1935261
Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (2014). Discourse and the Translator. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315846583/discourse-translator-hatim-ian-mason Retrieved October 1, 2013 from.
Haucsa, G. M., Marzuki, A. G., Alek, A., & Hidayat, D. N. (2020). Illocutionary Speech Acts Analysis in Tom Cruise's Interview. Academic Journal Perspective: Education, Language, and Literature, 8(1), 11-19. Retrieved May 27, 2020 http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/Perspective/article/view/3304
Honeck, R. P., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.). (2018). Cognition and figurative language. Routledge. Retrieved November 21, 2018 https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=j_d1DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=figurative+language+book&ots=aKwtNvr--o&sig=9EgZ1WQyAuJ9glo_2UaL5H0TyPA
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2019). Perception metaphors in cognitive linguistics. Perception metaphors, 19, 43. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=3SyGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA43&dq=metaphors+and+linguistics+&ots=kuty7EBvKp&sig=OH1jLaINxitUdYxtrMTMS8pZZK8
Javadi, M., & Zarea, K. (2016). Understanding thematic analysis and its pitfall. Demo, 1(1), 33-39. Retrieved March 25, 2016 From http://journals.rpp.co.ir/demo/paper/20011
Kövecses, Z. (2019). Perception and metaphor. Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O’Meara, Lila San Roque & Asifa Majid (eds.), Perception metaphors, 327-346. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=3SyGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA327&dq=metaphors+and+linguistics+&ots=kuty7EBvKp&sig=gFMAIo8lI2jmI3Pstkddstib4J8
Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P., & Keefer, L. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1045. Retrieved November, 2010 from https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037/a0020970
Landau, M. J., Zhong, C. B., & Swanson, T. J. (2018). Conceptual metaphors shape consumer psychology. Consumer Psychology Review, 1(1), 54-71. Retrieved December 16, 2017 from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/arcp.1002
Leezenberg, M. (2021). Contexts of metaphor. Brill. Retrieved October 1, 2021 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Os5GEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=Any+cognitive+content+a+metaphor+could+have,+according+to+this+comparison+theory,+should+be+reducible+to+a+collection+of+literal+similarity+claims.&ots=ut6BLZo_gY&sig=kANrp7H5PbL2aIfU9WD4n1T3iBA
Lester, P. E., Inman, D., & Bishop, L. K. (2014). Handbook of tests and measurement in education and the social sciences. Rowman & Littlefield. Retrieved December 2014 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=f0PcDQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=research+methods+in+social+sciences+&ots=yuJg4BbIXz&sig=56_eqrZ-J4ZqIhUpDjzKektNLec
Litosseliti, L. (Ed.). (2018). Research methods in linguistics. Bloomsbury Publishing. Retrieved September 20, 2018 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=kadvDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=research+methods+in+linguistics+&ots=oVHOkv_Pey&sig=jc-_GOTcHAmXUYOEQ7dMExvooWU
Mabaquiao Jr, N. M. (2018). Speech Act Theory: From Austin to Searle. Augustinian Journal, 19(1), 1-18. Retrieved https://www.academia.edu/download/68123954/Speech_Act_Theory_From_Austin_to_Searle.pdf
Mason, A. N., Narcum, J., & Mason, K. (2021). Social media marketing gains importance after Covid-19. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1870797. Retrieved 11 Jan 2021 from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23311975.2020.1870797
Matthews, K. E., Cook-Sather, A., Acai, A., Dvorakova, S. L., Felten, P., Marquis, E., & Mercer-Mapstone, L. (2019). Toward theories of partnership praxis: An analysis of interpretive framing in literature on students as partners in teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 280-293. Retrieved October 11, 2018 from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07294360.2018.1530199
Minda, S. (2021). Figurative language in students’ English book. Asian TESOL Journal, 1(1), 10-21. Retrieved November 30, 2021 From https://ejournal.altsacentre.org/index.php/asiantj/article/view/8
Niesen, P. (2018). 6. Speech Acts. In The Habermas Handbook (pp. 58-63). Columbia University Press. Retrieved October 24, 2017 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.7312/brun16642-008/html
Oxford dictionary (n.d.). Figurative language. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjjwaLQg9z3AhVeIbcAHdkJBTQQFnoECAMQAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oxfordreference.com%2Fview%2F10.1093%2Foi%2Fauthority.20110803095817535&usg=AOvVaw29lZ8NCHM384uiaIY4gyA6
Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. Retrieved August 1, 2020 from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a rticle/pii/S0969593120300585
Podesva, R. J., & Sharma, D. (Eds.). (2014). Research methods in linguistics. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=eeRRAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=research+methods+in+linguistics+&ots=TKi0Qa6D2g&sig=Bs9zg2Cs-FyS5WP4UMgDpMzgrfM
Prihodko, G. (2018). Specific nature of evaluative speech acts. Advanced Education, (9), 201-205. Retrieved June 29, 2018 from http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/novocv_2018_9_29.pdf
Rais, B., & Triyono, S. (2019). Pragmatic Analysis of Speech Acts on the Video of Prabowo Vs Jokowi-Epic Rap Battles of Presidency. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 2(3), 150-157. Retrieved May 30, 2019 from https://www.al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijllt/article/view/1413
Rajandran, K. (2020). ‘A Long Battle Ahead’: Malaysian and Singaporean prime ministers employ war metaphors for COVID-19. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 20(3), 261-267. Retrieved August 28, 2020 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7207/0ad549316635e53d5c509cd9fe14aa43d34e.pdf
Saragi, V., Nuratika, S., Fransiska, F., Yolanda, M., & Ardiyanti, N. (2019). A Review of Speech Act Theories Focusing on Searle (1969). Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 1(2), 61-68. Retrieved June 3, 2019 from http://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/elsya/article/view/3529
Sbisà, M. (2018). Varieties of speech act norms. In Normativity and variety of speech actions (pp. 23-50). Brill. Retrieved November 21, 2018 https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004366527/BP000002.xml
Schütze, C. T., Sprouse, J., Podesva, R. J., & Sharma, D. (2014). Research methods in linguistics. Pearson. Retrieved May 2012 https://www.jonsprouse.com/papers/Schutze%20and%20Sprouse%202014%20-%20RMIL.pdf
Seering, J., Kaufman, G., & Chancellor, S. (2022). Metaphors in moderation. New Media & Society, 24(3), 621-640. Retrieved October 20, 2020 from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444820964968
Semino, E. (2021). “Not soldiers but fire-fighters”–Metaphors and Covid-19. Health Communication, 36(1), 50-58. Retrieved November 10, 2020 from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989
Shaykhislamov, N. Z. U., & Makhmudov, K. S. U. (2020). Linguistics and Its Modern Types. Academic Research in Educational Sciences, (1), 358-361. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/linguistics-and-its-modern-types
Siemund, P. (2018). Speech acts and clause types: English in a cross-linguistic context. Oxford University Press. Retrieved March 18, 2018 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=WPhJDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Another+essential+component+of+pragmatics+is+the+theory+of+speech+acts+theory.+&ots=YyE1QmfzHk&sig=UrePu7heH3F27PzHbDP-deAjWrY
Simon, F. M., & Camargo, C. Q. (2021). Autopsy of a metaphor: The origins, use and blind spots of the ‘infodemic’. New Media & Society, 1461. Retrieved Jul 20, 2021 from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14614448211031908
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. Retrieved November 2019 from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319304564
Steen, G. J. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor—now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 9(1), 26-64. Retrieved Jan 2011 From https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste
Stockemer, D., Stockemer, G., & Glaeser. (2019). Quantitative methods for the social sciences (Vol. 50, p. 185). Quantitative methods for the social sciences: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved March 18, 2022 from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-99118-4.pdf
Taguchi, N. (2019a). Second language acquisition and pragmatics: An overview. The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics, 1-14. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781351164085-1/second-language-acquisition-pragmatics-naoko-taguchi
Taguchi, N. (Ed.). (2019b). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 1-14). New York: Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781351164085&type=googlepdf
Taguchi, N., & Ishihara, N. (2018). The pragmatics of English as a lingua franca: Research and pedagogy in the era of globalization. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 80-101. Retrieved October 03, 2018 From https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/annual-review-of-applied-linguistics/article/pragmatics-of-english-as-a-lingua-franca-research-and-pedagogy-in-the-era-of-globalization/A1839B76189CAD535DBB4D112C285C2F
Tedlock, D. (2011). The spoken word and the work of interpretation. In The Spoken Word and the Work of Interpretation. University of Pennsylvania Press. Retrieved June 3, 2011 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.9783/9780812205305/html
Valian, V. (2015). Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: language and cognition, 18(1), 3-24.
Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2010). Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Walter de Gruyter. Retrieved November 5, 2010 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=0RlIRKJmKDMC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Austin+established+the+speech+act+theory,+which+was+&ots=U9QLkpm6Sa&sig=ZYP2wum8lHwP_Mz0GE99zbFzh2I
Van Hulst, M., & Yanow, D. (2016). From policy “frames” to “framing” theorizing a more dynamic, political approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(1), 92-112. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0275074014533142
Wallace, E. (2021). Hyperbole. In Road Sides (pp. 44-49). University of Texas Press. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.7560/316566-009/html
Walliman, N. (2010). Research methods: The basics. Routledge. Retrieved November 17, 2010 from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203836071/research-methods-basics-nicholas-walliman
Wead, D. (2018). The literary devices in John's Gospel (Vol. 7). Wipf & Stock Publishers. Retrieved July 18, 2018https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=PlcXEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=english+literary+devices+book+&ots=LeH1MHy-th&sig=Acsgj5fFuFwPSK95tRfBq--QKhM
Wells, G. (1994). The complementary contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky to a “language-based theory of learning”. Linguistics and education, 6(1), 41-90.
Wicke, P., & Bolognesi, M. M. (2020). Framing COVID-19: How we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on Twitter. PloS one, 15(9), 40010. Retrieved September 30, 2020 from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240010
Wijana, I. D. P. (2021). On Speech Acts. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 3(1), 14-27. https://e-journal.iainsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/jopr/article/view/5125
Wyatt, S. (2021). Metaphors in critical Internet and digital media studies. New Media & Society, 23(2), 406-416. Retrieved February 25, 2021 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444820929324
Zufferey, S., Moeschler, J., & Reboul, A. (2019). Implicatures. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved June, 2019 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=lzCdDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=Implicature+is+used+as+a+means+to+cover+what+is+conveyed+or+implied+other+than+what+is+being+said&ots=SXt06VQ5vF&sig=tMjM0El54Hd2-ZKbu04dyGAu85k
