Pragmatic Competence in Learner English: The Case of Jordanian EFL Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1304.30Keywords:
pragmatic competence, pragmatic failure, Jordanian EFL learner, sociopragmatic competence, pragmalinguistic competenceAbstract
The study investigates the Jordanian EFL learners’ pragmatic competence through their production of the speech acts of responding to requests, making suggestions, making threats and expressing farewells. The sample of the study consists of 130 Jordanian EFL learners and native speakers. 2600 responses were collected through a Discourse Completion Test (DCT). The findings of the study revealed that the tested students showed similarities and differences in performing the strategies of four speech acts. Differences in the students’ performances led to pragmatic failure instances. The pragmatic failure committed by students refers to lack of linguistic competence (i.e., pragmalinguistic failure), sociocultural differences and pragmatic transfer (i.e., sociopragmatic failure). EFL learners employed many mechanisms to maintain their communicative competence; the analysis of the test on speech acts showed learners’ tendency towards using particular strategies, resorting to one strategy related to their grammatical competence, prefabrication, performing long forms, buffing and transfer. The results were also suggestive of the learners’ lack of pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic knowledge. The implications of this study are for language teachers to teach interlanguage pragmatics explicitly in EFL contexts to draw learners’ attention to both pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic features, pay more attention to these areas and allocate more time and practice to solve learners’ problems in these areas. The implication of this study is also for pedagogical material designers to provide sufficient and well-organized pragmatic input.
References
Al-Ali, M., & Alawneh, R. (2010). Linguistic mitigating devices in American and Jordanian students' requests. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(2), 311-339.
Albert, S., & Kessler, S. (1976). Processes for ending social encounters: The conceptual archaeology of a temporal place. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 6(2), 147–170.
Al Kayed, M., & Al-Ghoweri, H. (2019). A sociopragmatic study of speech act of criticism in Jordanian Arabic. European Journal of Scientific Research, 153(1), 105-117.
Al-Khaza'leh, B. (2018). Influence of social power on perception of speech act of apology by Jordanian second language speakers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 14(1), 211-229.
Almahameed, Y., & Mohamad, A. (2019). Pragmatic Failure Committed by Jordanian Undergraduate EFL Learners, International Journal of Language & Literature, 54-59.
Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1986). Too Many Words: Length of Utterance and Pragmatic Failure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8:165-180.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (1997). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. (2. ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dijk, V. (1977). Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.
Hassan, S. (2018). Exploring the challenges of teaching pragmatic competence in EFL classes. Basic Education College Magazine for Educational and Humanities Sciences, 39, 1707–1714.
Hinkel, E. (1996). When in Rome: Evaluations of L2 Pragmalinguistic behaviors. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(1), 51–70.
Huwari, I., & Al-Shboul, Y. (2015). A Study on the Perception of Jordanian EFL Learners' Pragmatic Transfer of Refusals. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1), 46-54.
Hymes, D. (1971). “On Communicative Competence’’ in C.J. Brumfit & K. Johnson (eds): The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching (1981), Oxford: OUP, pp 5-26.
Hymes, D. (1994). Toward ethnographies of communication. In: J. Maybin, ed., Language and literacy in social practice, 11-22. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Jucker, Andreas. (2017). Speech acts and speech act sequences: greetings and farewells in the history of American English. Studia Neophilologica. 89:1-20.
Jiang, X. (2006). Suggestions: What should ESL students know? Elsevier, 34(1), 36-54.
Knapp, M., Hart, R., Friedrich, G., & Shulman, G. (1973). The rhetoric of goodbye: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of human leave‐taking. Communications Monographs, 40(3), 182-198.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman
Muir, Y. (2011). Exploring pragmatic failure into the writing of young EFL learners: a critical analysis. English Language Teaching, 4(4). 254-261.
O'Keeffe, A., & Clancy, B., & Adolphs, S. (2011). Introducing Pragmatics in Use. London: Routledge.
Pishghadam, R., & Sharafadini, M. (2011). Delving into speech act of suggestion: A case of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(16), 11(4), 2-8.
Schmidt, R. (1995). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. [Honolulu]: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Shboul, O. (2010). Threatening Strategies in Jordanian Arabic and American English. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Yarmouk University.
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4:91-11 02.
Yu, M. (2011). Learning how to read situations and know what is the right thing to say or do in an L2: A study of socio-cultural competence and language transfer. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(4), 1127-1147.
