Interaction as a Predicator for EFL Undergraduate University Students’ Satisfaction With Online English Language Courses

Authors

  • Kholoud H. Amoush Al-Balqa Applied University
  • Rabab A. Mizher Al-Balqa Applied University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1304.14

Keywords:

satisfaction, interaction, EFL learners, online learning, online English courses

Abstract

As online learning becomes widespread in education field especially higher education, researchers showed great interest in identifying factors that affect students’ satisfaction with online courses. This study aimed at examining EFL undergraduate students’ satisfaction with online English courses in Jordanian universities. More specifically, it aims at investigating the role of interaction as a predicator for EFL students’ satisfaction with online English language courses. It is a quantitative approach. The researchers collected data by administering an online Microsoft Teams form to 189 undergraduate EFL students. One hundred and twelve responded to the five-Likert scale questionnaire. The accepted forms are 105. By applying the statistical method of SPSS, regression findings showed that the four-predictor variables (student-content interaction, student-instructor interaction, student-student interaction and student-technology interaction) affect positively students’ satisfaction with online English language courses. The study found that student-technology interaction and student-instructor interaction were the strongest and most significant predictors of student satisfaction with online English language courses. Moreover, findings showed statistically significant differences for the effect of students' interaction on students' satisfaction due to the students’ past online learning experience. This study helps the university instructors to understand the factors that contribute to the students’ satisfaction, which ultimately lead to an effective online learning. It also builds on the findings of previous studies that necessitate the need for much attention to two types of interaction: student-student and student-content.

Author Biographies

Kholoud H. Amoush, Al-Balqa Applied University

Department of English Language and Literature

Rabab A. Mizher, Al-Balqa Applied University

Department of English Language and Literature

References

Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133-148, DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562.

Artino, A. R. (2007). Online military training: Using a social cognitive view of motivation and self-regulation to understand students' satisfaction, perceived learning, and choice. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 191-202.

Ayanbode, O, F, Fagbe, A, Owolabi, R, Oladipo, S & Ewulo, O, R. (2022). Students’ interactions, satisfaction and perceived progress in an online class: Empirical evidence from Babcock University Nigeria. Cogent Education, 9:1, 2060783, DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2060783

Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., et al. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289. https:// doi: 10. 2307/40469094.

Bray, E., K. Aoki, and L. Dlugosh. (2008). Predictors of learning satisfaction in Japanese online distance students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3) 1–24.

Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the Computer User Self-Efficacy (Cuse) Scale: Investigating the Relationship between Computer Self-Efficacy, Gender and Experience with Computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26, 133 - 153.

Chang, V., & Fisher, D. (2003). The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument for online learning in higher education. In Technology-rich learning environments: A Future Perspective, (pp. 1-20).

Chen, Y.- J., & Chen, P.-C. (2007). Effects of online interaction on adult students’ satisfaction and learning. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 3, 78–89. doi:10.1080/14703290252934603 .

Cho, T.J. (2011). The Impact of Types of Interaction on Student Satisfaction in Online Courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 10(2), 109-125.

Clark, R.E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29

DeLoach, S. B., & Greenlaw, S. A. (2007). Effectively moderating electronic discussions. Journal of Economic Education, 38(4), 419-434.

DeTure, M. (2004). Cognitive style and self-efficacy: predicting student success in online distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), pp. 21-38.

Dharmadjaja, P., & Tiatri, S. (2021). The Effect of Online Interaction Types and Acceptance of Technology Factors on Student Satisfaction with Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Vol. 570.

Elliot, K. M., & Healy M. A. (2001). Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10, 1-11.

Elshami,W, Taha, M, Abuzaid, M, Saravanan, C, Al Kawas, S, & Abdalla, M,. (2021) Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. Medical Education Online, 26(1), 1920090, DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1920090.

Fredricksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., Swan, K., & Shea, P. (2000). Student Satisfaction and Perceived Learning with On-Line Courses: Principles and Examples from the SUNY Learning Network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4, 39A+. Retrieved June13, 2022, from https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A284451510/AONE?u=anon~6a55d677&sid=googleScholar&xid=6b6208fc

Gray, J. A. and Diloreto, M. (2016) The Effects of Student Engagement, Student Satisfaction, and Perceived Learning in Online Learning Environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11. Retrieved on 29 May, 2022, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1103654

Hawkins, A., Barbour, M. K., & Graham, C. R. (2011). Strictly business: teacher perceptions of interaction in virtual schooling. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 25(2), 210

Hillman, Daniel C., Deborah J. Willis, and Charlotte N. Gunawardena. (1994). “Learner‐ Interface Interaction in Distance Education: An Extension of Contemporary Models and Strategies for Practitioners.” American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2) 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526853

Jitsupa, J., Takomsane, M., Bunyawanich, S. Songsom, N., and Nilsook, P. (2022). Combining Online Learning with Gamification: An Exploration into Achievement, Motivation, and Satisfaction of the Undergraduate. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(7), 643-649

Johnson, S.D., Aragon, S.R. & Shaik, N. (2000). Comparative Analysis of Learner Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes in Online and Face-to-Face Learning Environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(1), 29-49. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153–162. doi:10.1080/14703290252934603

Kumar, P., Saxena, C., and Baber, H. (2021). Learner-content interaction in e-learning- the moderating role of perceived harm of COVID-19 in assessing the satisfaction of students. Smart Learn. Environ. 8,1–15. doi: 10.1186/s40561-021-00149-8

Kuo, Yu-Chun, Andrew E. Walker, Brian R. Belland, and Kerstin E. E. Schroder. (2013). “A Predictive Study of Student Satisfaction in Online Education Programs.” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1) 16–39. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338.

Kuo, Yu-Chun. (2014). Accelerated Online Learning: Perceptions of Interaction and Learning Outcomes Among African American Students. American Journal of Distance Education, 28:4, 241-252, DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2014.959334

Kurucay, M. & Inan, F. A. (2017). Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course, Computers & Education, 115, 20–37, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010

Lin, C.-H., Zheng, B. and Zhang, Y. (2016), Interactions and learning outcomes in online language courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12457.

Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d’Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 423-458. Retrieved February 10, 2022 from http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004423

Meyer, K. A. (2014). Student engagement in online learning: What works and why. ASHE Higher Education Report, 40(6), 1-114. Retrieved June 22, 2022 from https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aehe.20018

Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7.

Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: a systems view of online learning. New York: Wadsworth.

Moore, M. G., and G. Kearsley. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. New York: Wadsworth.

Muzammil, M., Sutawıjaya, A. & Harsası, M. (2020). Investigating student satisfaction in online learning: the role of student interaction and engagement in distance learning university. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE. 21(Special) 88-96. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770928

Ngo, J., & Ngadiman, A. (2021). Investigating Student Satisfaction in Remote Online Learning Settings during Covid-19 in Indonesia. Journal of International and Comparative Education (JICE), 73-95. https://doi.org/10.14425/jice.2021.10.2.0704

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step-by-Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. Routledge.

Pelteir, J. W., Drago, W., & Schibrowsky, J. A. (2003). Virtual communities and the assessment of online marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 260-276.

Pham, T., Lai, P., Nguyen, V., & Nguyen, H. (2021). Online learning amid Covid-19 pandemic: students’ experience and satisfaction. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 17(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135293.

Pinto, M., & Leite, C. (2020). Digital technologies in support of students learning in Higher Education: Literature review. Digital Education Review, 37,332-360.

Puzziferro, M. & Shelton, K. (2008). A model for developing high-quality online courses: Integrating a systems approach with learning theory. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3). 119-136.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. Wiley and Sons Ltd: United Kingdom.

Shee, D & Wang, Y. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers & Education, 50(3), pp. 894-905

Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in web-based online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 102–120.

Sposito, V. A., Hand, M. L., & Skarpness, B. (1983). On the efficiency of using the sample kurtosis in selecting optimal lpestimators. Communications in Statistics-simulation and Computation, 12(3), 265-272.

Strachota, E. (2003). Student satisfaction in online courses: An analysis of the impact of learner-content, learner-instructor, learner-learner and learner-technology interaction. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Ann Arbor, Michigan, UMI Publishing. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/119146/

Sun, P.C., Tsai, R.J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.Y. and Yeh, D. (2008). “What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & education, 50(4), 1183-1202.

Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22:2, 306-331, DOI: 10.1080/0158791010220208

Turkiewicz, J, Beczkowska, A, Skrobacki, R. (2022). Key Factors of Student Satisfaction with Distance Learning in the Situation of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Example of a Polish University. Journal of e-Learning and Higher Education, Vol. 2022. DOI: 10.5171/2022.268774

Vesely, P., Bloom, L. & Sherlock, J. (2007). Key Elements of Building Online Community: Comparing Faculty and Student Perceptions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 3(3), 234-246.

Weerasinghe, S, Lalitha, R, & Fernando, S. (2017). “Students’ Satisfaction in Higher Education Literature Review. American Journal of Educational Research, vol. 5, no. 5, P.P 533-539. https:// doi: 10.12691/education-5-5-9.

Weinberg, S. L., & Abramowitz, S. K. (2008). Statistics using SPSS: An Integrative Approach. Cambridge University Press.

Womble, J. C. (2007). E-learning: The relationship among learner satisfaction, self-efficacy, and usefulness (Doctoral dissertation). Alliant International University, San Diego, CA. Retrieved on 3 July 2022 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/119496/.

Wu, J.-H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T.-L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155–164. doi:10.1016/j. compedu.2009.12.012

Downloads

Published

2023-04-01

Issue

Section

Articles