Vietnamese Concepts of Love Through Idioms: A Conceptual Metaphor Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1304.06Keywords:
conceptual metaphors of love, Vietnamese concepts of love, target domains, source domains, idioms of loveAbstract
Love (romantic love) is an abstract concept that requires explanation. In addition to the universality of the concept, each nation has their own constructs of love, which can be expressed through idioms. Idioms represent special linguistic units because they contain cultural characteristics and national views. Idioms also reflect the colour and variety of human social activities and thus play an important role in the linguistic ontologisation of love. This paper aims to explore the Vietnamese concepts of love through idioms from a cognitive linguistic perspective. Conceptual metaphor theory (introduced by Lakoff & Johnson, 1980/2003) is a tool that allows the abstract target domain (LOVE) to be understood through more tangible source domains. To collect the data, a hand search of Vietnamese idiom dictionaries was conducted to establish a corpus of 126 entries, from which nine common conceptual metaphors were identified. Results from this study show that Vietnamese people regard LOVE as a predestined fate, in which the beauty of love in conjunction with nostalgia, passion, compatibility and closeness is praised, faithfulness in love is appreciated and revered, and inappropriate relationships and betrayal in love are opposed and condemned.
References
Anshen, F., & Aronoff, M. (1999). Using dictionaries to study the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 68, 16-26.
Baker, M. (1992). In other words: A coursebook on translation. Routledge.
Chau, D. H. (1981). Từ vựng-ngữ nghĩa tiếng Việt [Vietnamese lexicology-semantics]. Vietnam Education Publishing House.
Dan, N. D. (1986). Ngữ nghĩa thành ngữ và tục ngữ - sự vận dụng [Semantics of Vietnamese idioms and proverbs – application]. Journal of Language, 3, 8-10.
Dobrovol'skij, D. (2000). Contrastive idiom analysis: Russian and German idioms in theory and in the bilingual dictionary. International Journal of Lexicography, 13(3), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/13.3.169
Dobrovol'skij, D., & Piirainen, E. (2006). Cultural knowledge of idioms. International Journal of English Studies, 6(1), 27-41.
Duc, N. C. (1995). Bình diện cấu trúc hình thái-ngữ nghĩa của thành ngữ tiếng Việt [Vietnamese idioms from a formal-semantic perspective] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Vietnam Institute of Linguistics.
Giang, D. N. (2018). Idioms in English and Vietnamese. VNU Publishing House.
Gibbs, R. (1990). Psycholinguistic studies on the conceptual basis of idiomaticity. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 417-451. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.4.417
Gibbs, R. (1995). Idiomaticity and human cognition. In M. Everaert, E. van der Linden, A. Schenk & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: structural and psychological perspectives (97-116). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W. & Coulston, H. (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Hanh, H. V. (2008). Thành ngữ học tiếng Việt [Vietnamese idiom studies]. Social Sciences Publishing House.
Kövecses, Z. (1990). Emotion concepts. Springer-Verlag.
Kövecses, Z., & Szabo, P. (1996). Idioms: A view from cognitive semantics. Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 326-355. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.3.326
Kövecses, Z. (2000a). The scope of metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 79-92). Mouton de Gruyter.
Kövecses, Z. (2000b). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2000c). The concept of anger: Universal or culture specific? Psychopathology, 33(4), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1159/000029139
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd Ed). Oxford University Press.
Lan, N. (2003). Từ điển thành ngữ và tục ngữ Việt Nam [A dictionary of Vietnamese idioms and proverbs]. Literature Publishing House.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd Ed). The University of Chicago Press.
Langlotz, A. (2006). Occational adnominal idiom modification – A cognitive linguistic approach. International Journal of English Studies, 6(1), 85-108.
Luc, N., & Dang, L. V. (2009). Thành ngữ tiếng Việt [Vietnamese idioms]. Social Sciences Publishing House.
Menh, N. V. (1986). Vài suy nghĩ góp phần xác định khái niệm thành ngữ tiếng Việt [Some thoughts in contributing to the definition of idioms in Vietnamese]. Journal of Language, 3, 12-18.
Minh, T. H. (2007). Đi tìm điển tích thành ngữ [Seeking idioms’ classic references]. Vietnam News Publishing House.
Neumann, C. (2001). Is metaphor universal? Cross-language evidence from German and Japanese. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(1&2), 123-142.
Tien, T, B. (2012). Nghiên cứu thành ngữ biểu thị tâm lý tình cảm trong tiếng Anh và tiếng Việt từ bình diện ngôn ngữ học tri nhận [A study of emotion idioms in English and Vietnamese from a perspective of cognitive linguistics] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Vinh University.
Tissari, H. (2008). On the concept of sadness: Looking at words in contexts derived from corpora. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Corpus linguistics, computer tools, and applications – state of the art (pp. 291-308). Peter Lang.
Trao, N. V. (2009). Emotion expressing idioms in English and Vietnamese: A contrastive analysis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Queensland.
Wisker, G. (2001). The postgraduate research handbook. Palgrave.
Y, N. N., Hanh, H. V, Khang, N. V., Thai, L. X., & Thanh, P. X. (1998). Từ điển giải thích thành ngữ tiếng Việt [A dictionary of Vietnamese idioms]. Education Publishing House.
Y, N. N. (2002). Từ điển thành ngữ tiếng Việt phổ thông [A dictionary of common Vietnamese idioms]. VNU Publishing House.
