Cognitive Approach to Metaphor From Metonymy in Classical Chinese Poetry

Authors

  • Wei Li Southwest University
  • Huiqin Dai Southwest University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1303.27

Keywords:

metonymy, metaphor, metaphor from metonymy, classical Chinese poetry

Abstract

Metaphor and metonymy, which are treated as two basic cognitive and conceptual mechanisms in cognitive linguistics, are highly interactive to each other. Metaphor from metonymy, as a complicated linguistic device and cognitive mechanism, has long been ignored although it helps create abundant implications and aesthetic value in poetry. This paper explores functions of metaphor from metonymy in meaning construction in classical Chinese poetry in order to offer a new perspective for the research of classical Chinese poetry and provide implications for appreciation, translation and teaching of classical Chinese poetry.

Author Biographies

Wei Li, Southwest University

College of International Studies

Huiqin Dai, Southwest University

College of International Studies

References

Barcelona, A. (Ed.) (2003). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677

Goossens, L. (2002). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action [revised version]. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 349–78). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(82)90030-3

Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–77. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37

Quinn, N. & Holland D. (1987). Culture and cognition. In Holland D. & Quinn N. (Eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought, (pp. 3–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607660

Radden, G. (2000). How metonymic are metaphors? In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. (pp. 93–108). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677

Radden, G. (2002). How metonymic are metaphors? In Dirven, R., & Pörings, R. (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 407-434). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197

Radden, G. (2005). The ubiquity of metonymy. In J. L. O. Campo, I. Ferrando & B. Belles Fortuno (Eds.), Cognitive and discourse approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 11–28). Castellón de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I.

Riemer, N. (2002). When is a metonymy no longer a metonymy? In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 379–406). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197

Xu Yuanchong (2014). Selected Poems of Li Bai. Beijing: China Translation & Publishing Corporation.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-02

Issue

Section

Articles