Use of Polite Request Forms by Jordanian Children: Do Age and Gender Have an Impact?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1303.16Keywords:
politeness, requests, gender, age, directnessAbstract
This study aimed at finding the strategies of politeness in requests as well as the potential differences between Jordanian children in their use of such strategies. The study compared the participants on the basis of two variables: age and gender. According to the age variable, the participants were divided into three groups: 5, 7 and 9 year-olds. Each group contained 24 participants who were then divided into 12 males and 12 females. The researchers used video-recording to elicit the participants' requests while they ask the researchers for some cookies. On the basis of age, the findings support previous research that age has an obvious effect on the use of politeness in requests. It was found that nine-year-olds were more able to use indirect forms of requests than seven and five- year- old children. Although 5 and 7-year-olds were able to use indirect forms, they opted more to direct requests that have a semantic softener. On the basis of gender, the differences between males and females in using direct and indirect requests were irrelevant.
References
Baroni, M., & and Axia, G. (1985). Linguistic Politeness at Different Age Levels. Child Development, 56(4), 918-927.
Bates, E. (1976). Language and Context: the acquisition of pragmatics. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and Politeness (pp. 56-311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P., and Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Byon, A, S. (2004). Sociopragmatic Analysis of Korean Requests: pedagogical settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1673-1704.
Chamni, J. (2014). Gender Differences in Chinese Request Patterns. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 25(2), 193-210.
Coats, J. (1993). Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Difference in Language. (2nd ed.), New York: Longman Publishing.
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1977). Wait for my Roller-skate. In C. Mitchell-Kernan & S. Ervin-Tripp (Eds.), Child Discourse. New York: Academic Press.
Ervin-Tripp, S., & Rosenberg, J. (1984). Language and Power in the Family. In: C. Kriamerace and M. Schulz (Eds.), Language and power (pp. 116-135). Belmant, CA: Sage Press.
Fishman, P. (1978). Introduction: the work women do. Social Problems, 25, 397-406.
Garvey, C. (1975). Requests and Responses in Children's Speech. Journal of Child Language, 2, 41-63.
Holmes, J. (1995). Women's Talk in Public Contexts. Discourse and Society, 3(2), 131-150.
James, S. (1978). Effect of Listener age and Situation on the Politeness of Children's Directives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7, 307-317.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. New York, NY: London.
Macaulay, M. (2001). Tough Talk: Indirectness and Gender in Requests for Information. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 293-316.
McKelvie, M. (2000). The Effect of Hyper Femininity on Communication Patterns in Dating Couples. Dissertation Abstract International, 60, 63-75.
Nippold, M., Laurence L., & Anastopoulos, A. (1982). Development in the Use and Understanding of Polite forms in Children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25(2), 193-202.
Ratsi, A. (2015). Use of polite Request Forms by Iranian First-graders: Does Gender Make a Difference? Journal of Child Language Acquisition and Development, 3(1), 64-69.
Tannen, D. (1990). You Just don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: William Marrow.
Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ucar, E., & Ozden, A. B. (2015). Preschoolers' Use of Requests. Dilbilim Arastrimalari Degrisi, 2, 25-43.
