Implications of Design Thinking in an EFL Classroom: Writing in Context

Authors

  • Mohd Nazim Najran University
  • Taj Mohammad Najran University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1212.31

Keywords:

EFL students’ writing issues, design thinking’s five-step strategy, dramatic improvement etc

Abstract

Writing has been considered as one of the most creative discrete skills teaching and English as a Foreign Language (EFL) practitioners always regard it as a challenge. Many scholars explored EFL students’ writing problems through qualitative and quantitative studies and offered suggestions and recommendations to address the issues. However, they reserved their conclusions with a revisit on the efficacy of the desired results. This research, in a one group pre/post quasi experimental research context, suggests design thinking’s five-step strategy: Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, and Test, a relatively less experimented approach, to enhance EFL students’ writing performance with special emphasis on Capitalization, Punctuation, Spelling, Word-order, Tense, and Sentence-structure. The study sample consisted of 25 preparatory year students at Najran University who were taught paragraph writing using a five-step strategy based on the design thinking. The pre/post tests were conducted by the researchers to assess students’ writing performance before and after the experiment. Dependent samples t-test produced a significant difference in the results in favor of the post test. It is concluded that the design thinking’s five-step strategy had dramatically enhanced EFL student’ writing performance. Implications through further studies of design thinking are proposed to address other EFL teaching and learning issues.

Author Biographies

Mohd Nazim, Najran University

English Department, College of Languages and Translation

Taj Mohammad, Najran University

English Skills Department, Preparatory Year

References

Al-Khasawneh, F. M. (2014). Error Analysis of Written English Paragraphs by Jordanian Undergraduate Students. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Humanities, 2(8), 85–100.

Alrehaili, T., & Alhawsawi, S. (2020). Writing Approach Generation: Adapting Design Thinking to Enhance EFL Students' Writing Skills. International Journal of Current Research, 12(8), 1327–1329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24941/ijcr.38499.08.2020

Alsamadani, H. A. (2010). The relationship between Saudi EFL students’ writing competence, L1 writing proficiency, and self-regulation. European Journal of Social Sciences, 16(1), 53-63.

Baeck, A., & Gremett, P. (2012). Design Thinking: Expanding UX Methods Beyond Designers. In H. Degen & X. Yuan, UX Best Practices: How to Achieve More Impact with User Experience (pp. 229–250). New York: Osborne.

Banlomchon, J. (2006). An Errors Analysis of Free Compositions in writing English by Thai High School Students (Unpublished master’s thesis). The Christian University of Thailand.

Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). Change by Design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 381-383.

Glen, R. et al (2015). Teaching design thinking in business schools. International Journal of Management Education, 13(2), 182-192.

Gustilo, L., & Magno, C. (2012). Learner’s errors and their evaluation: The case of Filipino ESL writers. Philippine ESL Journal, 8, 96-113.

Kafai, Y. (1996). Learning design by making games: Children’s development of design strategies in the creation of a complex computational artifact. In: Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world (pp.71-96). New York: Routledge.

Khumphee, S. (2015). Grammatical Errors in English Essays Written by Thai EFL Undergraduate Students. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Suranaree University of Technology.

Leverenz, C. (2014). Design thinking and the wicked problem of teaching writing. Computers and Composition, 33, 1-12.

Marback, R. (2009). Embracing wicked problems: The turn to design in composition studies. College Composition & Communication, 61(2), 397-419.

McMillan, J. H., and Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in Education: Evidence-based Inquiry (6th ed.). Cape Town: Pearson.

Na-ngam, S. (2005). Common Grammatical Errors in Foundation English I Written Assignments of Prince of Songkla University Students with High and Low English Entrance Examination Scores. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Prince of Songkla University.

Khumphee, S. (2015). Grammatical Errors in English Essays Written by Thai EFL Undergraduate Students. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Suranaree University of Technology.

Noweski, C. Scheer, A. & Büttner, N. et al. (2012). Towards a paradigm shift in education practice: Developing 21st century skills with design thinking. In H. Plattner et al. (eds.) Design thinking research, Understanding Innovation (pp.71-94). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31991-4_5

Oxman, R. (1999). Educating the designerly thinker. Design Studies, 20(2), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00029-5

Purdy, J. (2014). What can design thinking offer writing studies? College Composition & Communication, 65(4), 612-641.

Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010). First International Conference on Design Creativity, ICDC 2010. In Design Thinking: An Educational Model towards Creative Confidence (pp. 1–8). Germany; Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Softwaresystemtechnik GmbH.

Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429

Seiffedin, A. & El-Sakka, S. (2017). The Impact of direct-indirect corrective Feedback on EFL students’ writing accuracy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(3), 166-175.

Shute, V. J., & Torres, R. (2012). Where streams converge: Using evidence-centered design to assess Quest to Learn. In M. Mayrath, J. Clarke-Midura, & D. H. Robinson (Eds.), Technology-based assessments for 21st century skills: Theoretical and practical implications from modern research (pp. 91–124). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Talib, T. & Cheung, Y. L. (2017). Collaborative writing in classroom instruction: A synthesis of recent research. The English Teacher, 46(2), 43 - 57.

Tran, T. Q., & Duong, T. M. (2018). EFL learners' perceptions of factors influencing learner autonomy development. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41, 194-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.02.009

Watson, M. (2017). Sustainable development goals through the design thinking lens. The India Design Project.

Wu, H. (2015). The Effects of Blog-supported Collaborative Writing on Writing Performance, Writing Anxiety and Perceptions of EFL College Students in Taiwan. (Doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-01

Issue

Section

Articles