A Biblical Archetypal Study on Moby Dick
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1212.19Keywords:
Melville, Moby Dick, The Bible, archetypal criticismAbstract
Moby Dick, one of Herman Melville’s masterpieces, has received tremendous concern for its profound and multiple symbolic and metaphoric meanings. And the pervasive biblical terms and allusions deserve particular attention. This paper, based on Frye's archetypal theory, studies Moby Dick from the perspective of biblical archetypal criticism. The association between the characters and their biblical archetypes helps to reproduce the ancient matrix of The Bible, such as the crime of human beings, themes of sin, the fall, and redemption. The exploration of the biblical archetypal theme in Moby Dick provides us a new perspective to understand the profound significance of the novel. Melville reveals the opposition between good and evil in human beings and shows his contradictory religious outlook as well as his spiritual reflections of his time.
References
Crown, Barinaed, (1991). “Reading Ahab” In Major Literary Characters. ed. by Harold, Bloom. New York et. Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers.
Delbanco, Andrew. (2005). Melville: His World and Work. New York: Knopf.
Edinger, Edward F. (1995). Melville's Moby-Dick: An American Nekyia. Inner City Books.
Emerso, Ralph Waldo. (1969). Selected Prose and Poetry. 2nd ed. Reginald L. Cook ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Feidelson, Charles. (1953). Symbolism and American literature. Thought: Fordham University Quarterly, 28(3), 493-452.
Frye, Northop. (1981). The Great Code: The Bible and Literature New York: Harcourt.
Frye, Northop. (1957). Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press
Frye, Northop. (1951). The Archetypes of Literature, The Kenyon Review, Vol. 13, No. 1. 92-110
Frye, Northrop. (2008). Words with Power: Being a Second Study of “The Bible and Literature”, Michael Dolzani ed. Toronto: U of Toronto Press.
Gentile, J. S. (2009). The Pilgrim Soul: Herman Melville's Moby-Dick as Pilgrimage. Text and Performance Quarterly, 29(4), 403-414.
Heidmann, Mark. (1979). Melville and the Bible: Leading Themes in the Marginalia and Major Fiction, 1850-1856. Yale University.
Jeske, Jeffery M. (1976). Macbeth, Ahab, and the Unconscious. American Transcendental Quarterly, 31(1), 5-18.
Jung, C. G. (1968). The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious, 2nd ed., trans. R. F. C. Hull. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton UP.
Jung, C. G. (1966). Psychology and Literature. The spirit in Man, Art, and Literature Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Kirsch ,James. (1958). The Enigma of Moby Dick. Journal of Analytical Psychology, Vol 2, No. 3. 131-148
Melville, Herman. (1999). Moby Dick. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
Patell, Cyrus R. K. (2015). Cosmopolitanism and the Literary Imagination. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Pardes, Ilana. (2008). Melville’s Bibles (Berkeley: U of California Press.
Pops, Martin Leo. (1970). The Melville Archetype. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press.
Williamson, Eugene. (1985). Plato’s ‘Eidos’ and the Archetypes of Jung and Frye. Interpretations, Vol 16, No. 1. 94-104.
Wright, Nathalia. (1974). Melville’s Use of The Bible. New York: Dule University Press.
Wright, Nathalia. (1940). Biblical Allusion in Melville’s Prose. American Literature, Vol. 12, No. 2 .May. 186-199.
Yaoxin, Chang. (2016). A Survey of American Literature. Tianjin: Nankai University Press
