Structure and Role of Grammatical Subjects in Old Javanese
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1212.16Keywords:
grammatical subject, argument, word category, grammatical roleAbstract
Historically, Old Javanese (OJ) language has been considered a dialect of the past and was developed rapidly from the IX - XV centuries. At that time, it was believed to be the language of communication and instruction for state administration. Although the language has evolved over the ages, it turns out that it has inherited several others. Therefore, OJ is suitable as a material for linguistic studies, and judging from its internal structure, it has many structural variations in forming its clauses. The grammatical subject should be described in detail and properly studied. The result shows that tentatively, the grammatical subjects in OJ can have different roles. By applying linguistic principles, this approach serves as a study model.
References
Ackerman, F. and Webelhuth. G. (1998). A Theory of Predicates. Standford, California: CSLI Publications.
Alsina, A. (1996). The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar, Evidence from Romance. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
Arka, I W. (1998). “From Morphosyntax to Pragmatiks in Balinese: A Lexical Funtional Approach”. Disertasi pada Departement of Linguistic, Sydney University.
Artawa, K. (1998). “Ergativity and Balinese Syntax”. Dalam NUSA Studies of Indonesian and Other Languages in Indonesia. vol. 42-44. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Bahasa dan Budaya.
Blake, B. J. (1991). “A moviegoer's guide to grammar”. Lecture notes for Linguistics I GR and II GR, 3rd Ed. Department of Linguistics La Trobe University.
Comrie, B. 1983. (1989). Language Universal Linguistik Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Erawati, N. K. R. (2014). ‘Valensi dalam Bahasa Jawa Kuna: Suatu Kajian Morfosintaksis. (Disertasi pada PS Doktor Linguistik Program Pascasarjana Universitas Udayana Denpasar.
Foley, W. A. & Valin, R. D. V. Jr. (1984). Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Givon, T. (1990). A Syntax, A Functional Typological Volume II. John Benjamin Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelpia.
Kroeger, P. (1993). Phrasa Structure and Grammatical Relation in Tagalog.Standford, California: CSLI Publications.
Lyons, J. (1987). Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haegeman, L. (1991). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Mahsun. (2005). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: PT Raja Grapindo Persada.
Palmer, F. R. (1994). Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Radford, A. (1997). Syntax: A minimalist Introduction. New York. Chambridge University Press.
Sedeng, I N. (2010). Morfosintaksis Bahasa Bali Dialek Sembiran: Analisis Tata Bahasa Peran dan Acuan. Denpasar: Udayana University Press.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.
Uhlenbeck, E. M. (1964). A Critical Survey of Studies on the Languages of Jawa and Madura. Martinus Nijhoff: ‘s-Gravenhage.
Valin, R. D. V. Jr. and LaPolla, R. J. (1997, 1999, 2002). Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Verhaar, J. W. M. (1996). Asas-Asas Linguistik Umum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Zoetmulder, P. J.dan Robson, S. O. (edisi terjemahan). (1995). Kamus Bahasa Jawa Kuna-Indonesia. Oleh Darusuprapta dan Sumarti Suprayitna. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Zoetmulder, P. J. (2006). Ȃdiparva: Bahasa Jawa Kuna dan Indonesia. Surabaya: Paramita.
