The Linguistic Realisation of “Pandemic” Concept in Contemporary English

Authors

  • Nataliia Shkvorchenko International Humanitarian University
  • Liubov Pershyna International Humanitarian University
  • Yuliia Sharapanovska International Humanitarian University
  • Hanna Adamova International Humanitarian University
  • Oleksandr Leontiev International Humanitarian University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1212.01

Keywords:

concept, pandemic, nominative units, neologisms

Abstract

A concept can be treated in two different ways: as a linguistic-cognitive phenomenon and a cultural one. The components of the conceptual system are perceived as individual signals created while reflecting information about this world. The purpose of the paper is to compare, analyse and classify the linguistic structure of the concept of "pandemic" in the modern English language. The concept of “pandemic” is socially important as a key element included in the linguistic picture of the world of almost every language nowadays. The concept of pandemic comprises various nominative units: different grammatical forms of the word “pandemic”, phrases with the word “pandemic”, synonyms to the word “pandemic”, pandemic-related words. The research methodology consists of selection of cognitive classification features and further ranking their brightness by the frequency principle. The concept of pandemic was analysed according to the combination of the following linguistic methods: acquisition, computer analysis, quantitative method, induction and deduction. The first stage of the research included grammatical analysis of the empirical material. In the second stage of the research neologisms (new words), new meanings of the existing words and new collocations were found.  The research has proved the recent changes in the structure and perception of the concept of "pandemic" in the contemporary English language. The vocabulary of the English language has been, on the one hand, enriched while, on the other hand, has narrowed the meanings of some particular words. Further research is prospective as the concept of the pandemic still tends to be enriched.

Author Biographies

Nataliia Shkvorchenko, International Humanitarian University

Department of Romance and German Philology and Foreign Language Teaching

Liubov Pershyna, International Humanitarian University

Department of Romance and German Philology and Foreign Language Teaching

Yuliia Sharapanovska, International Humanitarian University

Department of Romance and German Philology

Hanna Adamova, International Humanitarian University

Department of German and Eastern languages and Translation

Oleksandr Leontiev, International Humanitarian University

Department of Romance and German Philology and Foreign Language Teaching

References

Cruse, Alan (2000). Meaning in Language. An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford, New-York: Oxford University Press. 424 p.

Dirven, René (2004). Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 277 р.

Evans, Vyvyan (2004). The Structure of Time: language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 287 р.

Jackendoff Ray (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge/London : MIT Press. 322 p.

Harras, Gisela (2000). Concepts in Linguistics. Concepts in Natural Language. Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues, 8-th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000, Proceedings. pp. 13-26.

Pryhodko, Anna (2013). Concepts and conceptual systems. Dnipropetrovsk: Belaia Ye. A. 307 p.

Selіvanova, Olena (2006). Modern linguistics: Encyclopedia of terms. Poltava: Dovkіllya-K. 716 p.

Sossiur, Ferdinand de (1985). The linguistic sign: Semiotics. An Introductory Anthology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. pp. 28-46.

Zhaivoronok, Vitalii (2000). Ukrainian ethno linguistics. Kyyv: Dovіra. 262 p.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-01

Issue

Section

Articles