Moodle Integration Intervention in EFL Virtual Classroom and Academic Flow on University Students’ Achievement in Writing

Authors

  • Mujiono Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan
  • Siti Fatimah Muhammadiyah University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.26

Keywords:

academic flow, moodle, virtual classroom

Abstract

Teachers of English as a foreign language (EFL) now have more opportunities to use a learning management system (LMS) like Moodle to enhance EFL learners learning. This study aimed to examine the effect of Moodle as a learning management system based on academic flow on EFL learners' writing skills. The quasi-experimental research was designed to assess the impact of Moodle-based on academic flow on EFL learners' writing skills. This study recruited 69 second-year English Education Department as the sample population. They were divided into experimental and control groups. This study used an easy writing test and Study Work-Related Flow Inventory (WOLF-S) as the instruments. The study applied analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to compare both control and experimental groups' findings. The findings revealed that EFL students' writing skills were improved by using Moodle in an EFL virtual classroom rather than using conventional methods. Academic flow becomes a covariate of influence between the independent and dependent variables. These findings consistently favored the experimental groups. Moodle helped EFL university students to improve their writing skills.

Author Biographies

Mujiono, Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan

English Education Department

Siti Fatimah, Muhammadiyah University

Psychological Department

References

Aikina, T. Y., & Bolsunovskaya, L. M. (2020). Moodle-based learning: Motivating and demotivating factors. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i02.11297

Almalki, A. (2020). Integration of Technology among Saudi EFL Teachers. English Language Teaching, 13(8), 160. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n8p160

Alturise, F. (2020). Evaluation of the blackboard learn learning management system for full online courses in western branch colleges of Qassim University. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(15), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i15.14199

Alwaleedi, M. A., Gillies, R. M., & Obaidul Hamid, M. (2019). Collaborative writing in Arabic as a second language (ASL) classrooms: A mixed-method study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 32(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1521422

Amandu, G. M., Muliira, J. K., & Fronda, D. C. (2013). Using Moodle E-learning Platform to Foster Student Self-directed Learning: Experiences with Utilization of the Software in Undergraduate Nursing Courses in a Middle Eastern University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 677–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.260

Bakker, A. B. (2008). The work-related flow inventory: Construction and initial validation of the WOLF. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.007

Bakker, A. B., Golub, T. L., & Majdarijavec, M. (2017). Validacija inventara zanesenosti u studiranju (WOLF-S). Croatian Journal of Education, 19(1), 147–173. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v19i1.2194

Bataineh, K. B. Al, Banikalef, A. A. A., & Albashtawi, A. H. (2019). The Effect of Blended Learning on EFL Students’ Grammar Performance and Attitudes: An Investigation of Moodle. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 10(1), 2013–2015. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no1.27

Buck, B., Carr, S. R., & Robertson, J. (2008). Positive Psychology and Student Engagement. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education, 1(1), 28–35.

Buil, I., Catalán, S., & Martínez, E. (2017). The influence of flow on learning outcomes: An empirical study on the use of clickers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 00(00), 00–00. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12561

Butarbutar, R., & Simatupang, E. (2020). the Impact of Technology Hello English Application in EFL Classroom. Lingual: Journal of Language and Culture, 8(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.24843/LJLC.2019.v08.i02.p03

Chootongchai, S., & Songkram, N. (2018). Design and development of SECI and moodle online learning systems to enhance thinking and innovation skills for higher education learners. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(3), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i03.7991

Costa, C., Alvelos, H., & Teixeira, L. (2012). The Use of Moodle e-learning Platform: A Study in a Portuguese University. Procedia Technology, 5(May 2014), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.037

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row.

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. (2000). Book Review. Journal of Happyness Studies, 1, 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010032312178

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. (2014). Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8

de Manzano, Ö., Cervenka, S., Jucaite, A., Hellenäs, O., Farde, L., & Ullén, F. (2013). Individual differences in the proneness to have flow experiences are linked to dopamine D2-receptor availability in the dorsal striatum. NeuroImage, 67, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.072

El-Maghraby, A.-S. A. (2021). Investigating The Effectiveness of Moodle Based Blended Learning in Developing Writing Skills for University Students. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology, 7(1), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.21608/jrciet.2021.134636

Elias, H., Mustafa, S. M. S., Roslan, S., & Noah, S. M. (2010). Examining potential relationships between flow and motivational forces in Malaysian secondary school students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 2042–2046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.443

Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9102-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9102-4

Esichaikul, V., Lamnoi, S., & Bechter, C. (2011). Student modelling in adaptive e-learning systems. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 3(3), 342–355. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2011.03.025

Fathi, J., & Torabi, S. (2019). The contribution of a course management system (Cms)-supported instruction to developing grammar performance: a case of Iranian EFL learners. Call-Ej, 20(2), 89–98. Retrieved February 18, 2022, from http://callej.org/journal/20-2/Fathi-Torabi2019.pdf

Ghouali, K., & Cecilia, R. R. (2021). Towards a moodle-based assessment of Algerian EFL students' writing performance. Porta Linguarum, 2021(36), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi36.17866

Gilman, R., Huebner, E. S., & Furlong, M. J. (2009). Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0053

Goh, C. F., Hii, P. K., Tan, O. K., & Rasli, A. (2020). Why do University teachers use e-learning systems? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 21(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i2.3720

Gulbinskienė, D., Masoodi, M., & Šliogerienė, J. (2017). Moodle as virtual learning environment in developing language skills, fostering metacognitive awareness and promoting learner autonomy. Pedagogika, 127(3), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2017.47

Hakim, B. (2020). Technology Integrated Online Classrooms and the Challenges Faced by the EFL Teachers in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 9(5), 33. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.5p.33

Jani, J. S., & Mellinger, M. S. (2015). Beyond “writing to learn”: Factors influencing students’ writing outcomes. Journal of Social Work Education, 51(1), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2015.977177

Khoza, S. B., & Mpungose, C. B. (2018). Use of the moodle curriculum by lecturers at a South African university. Proceedings of the International Conference on E-Learning, ICEL, 2018-July, 171–178.

Kim, E., & Seo, E. H. (2013). the Relationship of Flow and Self-Regulated. 41(7), 1099–1114. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.7.1099

Lee, E. (2005). The relationship of motivation and flow experience to academic procrastination in university students. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.166.1.5-15

Ljubin-Golub, T., Rijavec, M., & Jurčec, L. (2018). Flow in the Academic Domain: The Role of Perfectionism and Engagement. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0369-2

Maeran, R., & Cangiano, F. (2013). Flow experience and job characteristics: Analyzing the role of flow in job satisfaction. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 20(1), 13–26. Retrieved April 28, 2021, from https://www.tpmap.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/20.1.2.pdf

Merey, G., & Alkan, R. M. (2015). An Overview of international education in higher education from a macro perspective. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 5(2). Retrieved October 30, 2021, from https://www.tojned.net/journals/tojned/articles/v05i02/v05i02-01.pdf

Mesurado, B., Cristina Richaud, M., & José Mateo, N. (2016a). Engagement, flow, self-efficacy, and Eustress of University Students: A cross-national comparison between the Philippines and Argentina. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 150(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1024595

Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez. Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Press.

Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2014). Longman academic writing series 3: Paragraphs to essays(4th ed.). Pearson Education ESL.

Özhan, Ş. Ç., & Kocadere, S. A. (2020). The Effects of Flow, Emotional Engagement, and Motivation on Success in a Gamified Online Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(8), 2006–2031. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118823159

Padayachee, P., Wagner-Welsh, S., & Johannes, H. (2018). Online assessment in Moodle: A framework for supporting our students. South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(5), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.20853/32-5-2599

Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Sifaki, E. (2018). Access Moodle Using Smart Mobile Phones . A Case Study in a Greek University. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Creative Technologies, 5(16), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76908-0_36

Park, A., Williams, E., & Zurba, M. (2020). Understanding hope and what it means for the future of conservation. Biological Conservation, 244(May 2019), 108507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108507

Quvanch, Z., & Kew, S. N. (2020). A Review on Impact of Blended Learning on the English Writing Skills. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal, 4(1), 41–50. Retrieved January 31, 2022 from https://itlj.utm.my/index.php/itlj/article/view/46/40

Raygan, A., & Moradkhani, S. (2020). Factors influencing technology integration in an EFL context: investigating EFL teachers’ attitudes, TPACK level, and educational climate. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839106

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326

Schettini, C., Amendola, D., Borsini, I., & Galassi, R. (2020). A blended learning approach for general chemistry modules using a moodle platform for first year academic students. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(2), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135197

Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860

Sosas, R. V. (2021). Technology in teaching speaking and its effects to students learning English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 958–970. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.66

Sumaya, I. C., & Darling, E. (2018). Procrastination, Flow, and Academic Performance in Real Time Using the Experience Sampling Method. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 179(3), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2018.1449097

Ueda, H., Furukawa, M., Yamaji, K., & Nakamura, M. (2018). SCORMAdaptiveQuiz: Implementation of Adaptive e-Learning for Moodle. Procedia Computer Science, 126, 2261–2270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.223

Zanjani, N., Edwards, S. L., Nykvist, S., & Geva, S. (2017). The important elements of LMS design that affect user engagement with e-learning tools within LMSs in the higher education sector. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2938

Zelinskiy, S. (2020). Analysis of the Possibilities of the Moodle Learning Management System for Organization of Distance Learning in the Condition of the University. 5(38), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2020.213100

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles