Online Scaffolding Strategies: Case Studies of Asian EFL Learners in an Academic Writing Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.10Keywords:
scaffolding strategies, online collaborative writing, writing performance, EFL learners, negotiationsAbstract
The article reported a case study investigating the scaffolding strategies of twelve Asian EFL learners in four small groups’ scaffolding strategies during two online collaborative writing (OCW) tasks in a composition course using Google Docs as a writing platform. Of interest was how EFL learners with different L1 scaffold each other while co-constructing OCW tasks, and also if scaffolding strategies used during OCW tasks influence writing performance. Data collection included pre-test and post-test writing, two OCW tasks on descriptive and argumentative essays, learners’ use of scaffolding and non-scaffolding negotiations during OCW tasks observed through Google Docs revision history, and student reflection. The findings showed that learners in small groups employed both scaffolding and non-scaffolding dialogues to jointly construct their OCW tasks by giving advice, providing suggestions, responding to questions or requests, asking questions, or clarifying ideas. Learners who contributed more texts directed their team and initiated both scaffolding negotiations and non-negotiations while performing group work. The study results also revealed that members who employed more scaffolding negotiations during their OCW processes likely produced a better quality of writing in their post-test. Nevertheless, these findings indicated that members in small groups benefited from both scaffolding and non-scaffolding negotiations as they helped in task revisions. The findings contributed to research that has investigated online scaffolding strategies in EFL learners’ collaborative writing tasks.
References
Alghasab, M., Hardman, J., & Handley, Z. (2019). Teacher-student interaction on wikis: Fostering collaborative learning and writing. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 10-20.
Arnold, Nike, Ducate, Lara, & Kost, Claudia. (2009). Collaborative writing in wikis: Insights from culture projects in German classes. In L. Lomicka, & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 58–89). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Boggs, J. A. (2019). Effects of teacher-scaffolded and self-scaffolded corrective feedback compared to direct corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in English L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, 1-13. Retrieved April 10, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100671
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev & S. M. Miller (Eds.). Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39- 64). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, W. (2019). An exploratory study on the role of L2 collaborative writing on learners’ subsequent (a) individually composed texts. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(6), 563-573.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
Dobao, A. F. (2014). Attention to form in collaborative writing tasks: Comparing pair and small group interaction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(2), 158-187.
Elabdali, R., & Arnold, N. (2020). Group dynamics across interaction modes in L2 collaborative wiki writing. Computers and Composition, 58, 1-17.
Ghufron, M. A., & Ermawati, S. (2018). The strengths and weaknesses of cooperative learning and problem-based learning in EFL writing class: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 657-672.
Gutiérrez, G. A. G. (2006). Sociocultural theory and its application to CALL: A study of the computer and its relevance as a mediational tool in the process of collaborative activity. ReCALL, 18, 230-251.
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect, 20(1), 6-30.
Hanjani, A. M., & Li, L. (2014). Exploring L2 writers’ collaborative revision interactions and their writing achievement. System, 44, 101-114. Retrieved March 30, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.03.004
Hannafin, M. J. & Land, S. M. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-centered student-centered learning environment. Instructional Science, 25, 167-202.
Hsieh, Y. C. (2020). Learner interactions in face-to-face collaborative writing with the support of online resources. ReCALL, 32(1), 85-105.
Kitjaroonchai, N., & Suppasetseree, S. (2021a). Online collaborative writing via Google Docs: Case studies in the EFL classroom. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(6), 922-934.
Kitjaroonchai, N., & Suppasetseree, S. (2021b). A case study of ASEAN EFL learners’ collaborative writing and small group interaction patterns in Google Docs. English Language Teaching, 14(5), 89-108.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 197-221). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2021). Peer feedback or peer feedforward? Enhancing students’ argumentative peer learning processes and outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 768-784.
Lee, K. Y., & Hassell, D. G. (2021). Students’ attitudes and preferences towards Google Docs as a collaborative writing platform. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 1-15.
Lewis, R. D. (2010). When cultures collide: Leading across cultures. Boston, MA: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Li, M., & Kim, D. (2016). One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 25-42. Retrieved April 12, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.002
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2013). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 61-82.
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Explaining dynamic interactions in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 96–120.
Majid, A. H. A., & Stapa, S. H. (2017). The use of scaffolding technique via Facebook in improving descriptive writing among ESL learners. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 23(4). Retrieved April 12, 2022, from http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2304-07
Mavrou, K., Lewis, A., & Douglas, G. (2010). Researching computer-based collaborative learning in inclusive classrooms in Cyprus: The role of the computer in pupils' interaction. British Journal of Educational Technology. 41(3), 486-501.
Olson, J. S., Wang, D., Olson, G. M., & Zhang, J. (2017). How people write together now: Beginning the investigation with advanced undergraduates in a project course. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 24(1), 4, 1-40.
Pritchard, A., & Woollard, J. (2010). Psychology for the classroom: Constructivism and social learning. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Rasmussen, J. (2001). The importance of communication in teaching: A systems-theory approach to the scaffolding metaphor. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(5), 569-582.
Rovira, V. (2015). Task based pedagogy in technology mediated writing, Lingnan University, In Proceedings of the 17th International CALL Conference Task Design and CALL, pp21-26.
Savasci, M., & Kaygisiz, S. (2019). One hand washes the other and both wash the face: Individuality versus collaboration in L2 writing. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 131-151.
Shooshtari, Z. G., & Mir, F. (2014). ZPD, tutor; peer scaffolding: sociocultural theory in writing strategies application. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1771-1776. Retrieved April 15, 2022, from http://doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.605
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296.
Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
Verenikina, I. (2003). Understanding scaffolding and the ZPD in educational research. Proceedings of The Joint AARE/NZARE Conference. Retrieved April 15, 2022, from https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=1695&context=edupapers
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In L.S. Vygotsky, Collected works (vol. 1, pp. 39-285). New York: Plenum.
Williams, C., & Beam, S. (2019). Technology and writing: Review of research. Computers & Education, 128, 227-242. Retrieved April 17, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.024
Wilson, K., & Devereux, L. (2014). Scaffolding theory: High challenge, high support in academic language and learning (ALL) contexts. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(3), A91-A100.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S. & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89–100.
Woodrich, M., & Fan, Y. (2017). Google Docs as a tool for collaborative writing in the middle school classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 16, 391-410.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zhang, M. (2019). Towards a quantitative model of understanding the dynamics of collaboration in collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 16-30. Retrieved April 17, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.04.001
