A Typological Study of the Mongolian and Chinese Comparatives From the Perspective of the Cardiff Grammar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1209.16Keywords:
Mongolian comparative, Cardiff Grammar, systemic functional linguistics, typologyAbstract
This paper explores the syntactic and semantic functions of “NP + ᠡᠴᠡ᠌ (aca/ece)” in the Mongolian comparatives and “比(bǐ)+ NP” in the Chinese comparatives from the perspective of the model of Cardiff Grammar in Systemic Functional Linguistics. It is found that “NP + ᠡᠴᠡ᠌ (aca/ece)” in the Mongolian comparatives is case group, which can function as Main Verb and Adjunct. “比(bǐ)+ NP” in the Chinese comparatives is prepositional phrase, which can serve as Main Verb, Adjunct and Complement. Through the typological analysis, we find that the similarities in Mongolian and Chinese comparatives outweigh their differences in terms of process type and subject theme. However, the detailed features vary in the most delicate systems – within the lexical zone at the stratum of lexicogrammar. The findings not only provide a tentative solution to the long-standing debates on the comparatives, but also shed light on the teaching and learning of the comparatives in Mongolian and Chinese.
References
Daobu. (1979). Meng gu yu ju zi jie gou fen xi [An analysis of the Mongolian sentence structures]. Minority Languages of China, (2): 99-107.
Daobu. (1983). Meng gu yu jian zhi [Brief Records of the Mongolian Language]. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House.
Delgerma, Gao, L.H. & Qimuge. (2013). Meng gu yu yu han yu ju fa jie gou fen xi [A Contrastive Study of Mongolian and Chinese Syntactic Structures]. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House.
Deng, F.M. (2015). Han zang yu cha bi ju yan jiu [A Study of Comparatives in Chinese and Tibetan]. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing Press.
Fu, Y.C. (1978). Comparative Structure in English and Mandarin Chinese [Unpublished Ph. D’s Dissertation]. University of Michigan.
Fawcett, R. P. (2000). A Theory of Syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Fawcett, R.P. (2008). Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics through the Cardiff Grammar: an extension and simplification of Halliday’s systemic functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Equinox.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Grammar (1st ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. (2013). Halliday in the 21st Century. Edited by J. Webster. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
Halliday, M.A.K. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Revised by C.M.I.M. Matthiessen. London and New York: Routledge.
He, W. & Xue, J. (2018). Han yu “dong liang ci” zhi jia de fu yu fa shi jiao yan jiu [The analysis of Chinese verb quantifier from the perspective of Cardiff Grammar]. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 41(1): 30-38.
Hong, W.W. (1991). Comparative structure in Mandarin Chinese [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. National Tsinghua University.
Liu, C.S. (1996). A Note on Chinese Comparatives. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 26: 217-235.
Liu, Y. (2004). Xian dai han yu bi jiao fan chou de yu yi ren zhi ji chu [The Semantic and Cognitive Basis of the Category of Comparison in Modern Chinese]. Shanghai: Xuelin Press.
Qinggertei. (1991). Meng gu yu yu fa [A Grammar of the Mongolian Language]. Huhehot: Inner Mongolia People Press.
Sa, E.Y. (2003). Xian dai han yu “cha bi ju” yan jiu [A Study of Comparative Constructions in Modern Chinese] [Unpublished Ph. D’s Dissertation]. Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
Su, R.N. (2015). Han meng cha bi ju dui bi yan jiu [A Comparative Study of Chinese Mongolian Comparative Sentences] [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Jilin University.
Sunderiya. (2013). Meng gu yu “ge” yu han yu jie ci de bi jiao yan jiu [A Comparative Study of the Mongolian “Grid” with the Chinese Preposition] [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Jilin University.
Tucker, G.H. (1998). The Lexicogrammar of Adjectives: a systemic functional approach to lexis. London: Cassell Academic.
von Stechow, A. (1984). Comparing the semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics, 3(1): 1⁃77.
Xiang, D.J. (2019). Xian dai han yu “rang” zi de gong neng shi jiao yan jiu [A functional approach to “rang” in modern Chinese. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing] (Social Science Edition), 35 (6): 10-17.
Xiang, D.J. & Liu, C.Y. (2018). The semantics of MOOD and the syntax of the Let’s-construction in English: a corpus-based Cardiff Grammar approach. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 38 (4): 549-585. https://doi.10.1080/07268602.2018.1510726
Xiang, M. (2005). Some Topics in Comparative Constructions [Unpublished Ph. D’s Dissertation]. Michigan State University.
Xu, G. P. (2007). Xian dai han yu cha bi fan chou yan jiu [The Study on the Comparatives in Modern Chinese]. Shanghai: Xuelin Press.
Zhao, Y.R. (1968). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. California: University of California Press.
Zhang, J.Y. & Zhang, Y. (2012). “You” zi bi jiao ju de jia de fu yu fan shi jiao yan jiu [The tentative analysis of “YOU”-comparative sentence from the perspective of Cardiff Grammar]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing (Social Sciences Edition), 28 (01): 34-40.
