Online-Based L2 Writing Courses and Practicing Metacognitive Strategies: Teacher-Regulated or Individualized?

Authors

  • Maryam Shirvani Islamic Azad University
  • Reza Porkar Islamic Azad University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1207.23

Keywords:

essay writing, explicit teaching, ndividualized practices, metacognitive strategies, online writing

Abstract

Research findings show the usefulness of employing metacognitive strategies in writing classes. However, the approach toward teaching the strategies is not mainly addressed. The present study investigated the impact of two methods on metacognitive strategies in an online writing course. In doing so, 20 intermediate EFL learners (n1=n2=10) in two classes were randomly assigned to two treatment conditions. A sample of the IELTS test administered at the onset of the study verified the participants’ homogeneity regarding English proficiency. In one group, Teacher-regulated Metacognitive Instruction (TRMI), the teacher taught metacognitive strategies during the different stages of writing tasks. In the second group, Individualized Metacognitive Practices (IMP), the teacher did not teach the metacognitive strategies and only had a facilitating role. The learners used a questionnaire (Zhang & Qin, 2018) to practice the strategies. After the treatment, the groups sat for a writing posttest and answered a metacognitive strategies questionnaire. The independent samples t-test revealed that the IMP outperformed the TRMI in argumentative essay writing. The frequency count obtained from the respondents’ answers to the questionnaire showed that IMP used more strategies in the three levels of planning, monitoring, and evaluating. The study has implications for EFL/ESL teachers and scholars interested in reflective practices. 

Author Biographies

Maryam Shirvani, Islamic Azad University

Faculty of Arts and Architecture, Central Tehran Branch

Reza Porkar, Islamic Azad University

TEFL Department, North Tehran Branch,

References

Alamri, B. (2019). Exploring metacognitive strategies employed by ESL writers: Uses and awareness. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n1p159

Al-jarrah, T. M., Mansor, N., Rashid, R. A., Ibrahim, B., & Al-Jarrah, J. M. (2018). EFL students’ attitude toward using metacognitive strategies in writing. English Language Teaching, 11(10), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n10p162

Al Moqbali, I. S., Al Humaidi, S., Al Mekhlafi, A., & Hilal, M. A. (2020). Metacognitive writing strategies used by Omani grade twelve students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(8), 214–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.8.12

Aryanjam, L., Rashtchi, M., & Maftoon, P. (2021). Boosting reading achievement by employing learner autonomy curriculum: Effects of strategy instruction. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10 (3), 51- 70.

Bailey, J., & Powell, P. (2008). The practical writers with readings (7th edition). Thomson Higher Education.

Briggs, A. R., Clark, J., & Hall, I. (2012). Building bridges: Understanding student transition to university. Quality in Higher Education, 18(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2011.614468

Cer, E. (2019). The instruction of writing strategies: The effect of the metacognitive strategy on the writing skills of pupils in secondary education. SAGE Open, 9(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019842681

Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2013). The disposition to understand for oneself at university: Integrating learning processes with motivation and metacognition. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 267-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12010

Fiani, A. (2020). Students’ perception toward the enactment of metacognitive instruction in an EFL writing class: lesson learned from a private university in Indonesia. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 3(3), 220–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/rill.v3i3.4105

Fitrianti, N. A., & Arik Susanti, A. (2021). EFL students’ metacognitive strategies in online-based learning: In relation to their writing quality. PARAMASASTRA, 8 (1), 1-19.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Flavell, J. H. (2016). Development of children’s knowledge about the mind. In. R. J. Sternberg, S. T. Fiske, & D. J. Foss (Eds.), Scientists making a difference: One hundred eminent behavioral and brain scientists talk about their most important contributions (pp. 198-201). Cambridge University Press.

JozeTajareh, M., & Rashtchi, M. (2019). The characteristics of reflective teacher and reflective teaching. Roshd Foreign Language Teaching Journal. 34(1). 7-13.

Oxford, R. L. (2016). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Routledge.

Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–51). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Polio, C., & Friedman, D. A. (2017). Understanding, evaluating, and conducting second language writing research. Routledge.

Raoofi, S., Binandeh, M., & Rahmani, S. (2017). An Investigation into writing strategies and writing proficiency of university students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(1), 191-198. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0801.24

Rashtchi, M. (2019). Scaffolding argumentative essay writing via reader-response approach: A case study. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 4(12), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-019-0078-2

Rashtchi, M., & Aghajanzadeh, M. (2008). Comparative critical reading strategy and writing achievement of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 1(2), 117-130.

Rashtchi, M., & Khani, P. (2010). Improving Iranian EFL learners’ oral proficiency through metacognitive strategies instruction. Journal of English Language Studies, 1(4), 137-156.

Rashtchi, M., & Ghandi, M. (2011). Writing revision strategies: Do they enhance writing ability? Man and the Word (Zmogus ir Zodis), 13(3), 67-80.

Rashtchi, M., & Beiki, M. (2015). The effect of teacher-generated cooperative brainstorming versus learner-generated brainstorming on activating EFL learners’ background knowledge in essay writing classes. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 5(S2), 1218-1227.

Rashtchi, M., & Birjandi, P. (2018). Research methods a textbook for EFL learners. Rahnama Press.

Rashtchi, M., & Mohammadi, M. A. (2017). Teaching lexical bundles to improve academic writing via tasks: Does the type of input matter? Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 14(2), 201-219.

Rashtchi, M., Porkar, R., & Ghazi Mir Saeed, F. (2019). Product-based, process-based, and genre-based instructions in expository writing: Focusing on EFL learners’ performance and strategy use. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(6), 115-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3427842

Rashtchi, M., & Porkar, R. (2020). Brainstorming revisited: Does technology facilitate argumentative essay writing? Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 18, 40-52. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2020.18.01

Sabah, S., & Rashtchi, M. (2016). Critical thinking in personal narrative and reflective journal writings by in-service EFL teachers in Iran: Assessment of reflective writing. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 35(3), 157-182. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2016.3900

Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science 26 (1-2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033

Schraw, G., Crippen, K., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education 36(1), 111-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8

Teng, M. F. (2020). Tertiary-level students’ English writing performance and metacognitive awareness: A group metacognitive support perspective Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64 (4)551-568. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1595712

Wang, Z. & Han, F. (2017). Metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive control of writing strategy between high- and low-performing Chinese EFL writers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(7), 523-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0707.04

Xiao, Y. (2007). Applying metacognition in EFL writing instruction in China. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 6 (1), 19-33.

Young, A., & Fry, J. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1-10.

Yulianti, D. B. (2018). Learning strategies applied by the students in writing English text. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 8(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v8i1.583

Zhang, L. J., & Qin, T. L. (2018). Validating a questionnaire on EFL writers’ metacognitive awareness of writing strategies in multimedia environments. In Å. Haukås, C. Bjørke, & M. Dypedahl (Eds.). Metacognition in language learning and teaching (pp. 157-178). Routledge. Retrieved June 25, 2021, from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/oa-edit/10.4324/9781351049146-9/validating-questionnaire-efl-writers-metacognitive-awareness-writing-strategies-multimedia-environments-lawrence-jun-zhang-tony-limin-qinavailable

Downloads

Published

2022-07-04

Issue

Section

Articles